Question

帮我翻译一下这段文字，翻译成中文，谢谢！

If you’ve been trying to convince yourself that full frame isn’t that big of a deal, well you’ve been lying to yourself. As I said before, that bigger sensor makes a difference and most of that is evident in a little something called “image quality” (imporant to quite a few photograhers I hear). Full frame provides better, crisper, clearer, cleaner images. There’s a terrific example of this advantage at Japanese site DC Watch with excellent comparison shots of the D700, D3, and D300. As expected the D700 and D3 look quite similar. And while removed from this context the D300 looks very good, it just can’t compete with its siblings in overall IQ. When the ISO gets cranked up it falls even further behind. This has been repeated ad nauseum, but the D3 (and D700) have just utterly ridiculous noise management at high ISO. This amazes me because 6400 ISO looks like 400 ISO on my D80. True, the D300 is infinitely better performing than the D80, but the D700 gives even more detail, and even less noise, at a $2000 discount to the D3 (for right now).

In short full frame matters.

Answer 1

如果你一直试图说服自己,全帧也不是什么大不了的事,那么你一直在欺骗自己。正如我之前说过的,那更大的传感器有很大差异,而且其中大多数是显而易见的,从对一种被称为“小”(重要的图像质量,相当多的photograhers我听到)。全帧提供了更好的,更清洁,更清晰,图像。有一家很不错的例子,这种优势在日本网站直流手表与优秀的比较,投篮,D300 D700 D3。正如所料,D700看上去很相似,D3。虽然去掉这种背景下,D300看起来很不错,只是没法和它的兄弟姐妹总体智商。当ISO得到进一步继续施压它落在后面。这被重复,但广告nauseum D700 D3(和)刚纯属无稽之谈噪声管理在高ISO。这让我感到惊奇,因为第6400 ISO国际标准化组织(ISO)在我看起来像400 D80。是真,D300无限美好的表演,但比D80 D700甚至更多的细节,并给出甚至、噪音低、在2000美元的折扣吗D3(现在)。简而言之全帧事宜。

Answer 2

如果你一直试着说服自己 取相框没啥大不了的，那么你就是一直在骗自己。 正如我曾经说过的大的传感器更好并且很明显对“图像质量”（我听说对相当一些摄影爱好者）密切相关。 只要有更好的框子，就会有耐保存、更清晰干净的图像。比如说，日本的DC WATCH 这款机子D700 D300、D3都有高的镜头对比度，D700 D3都特别小巧，他们都是从d300转化过来的而拥有更好的外形，但他们根本不在一个档次，他们的iso远远不如d300。不过广告上已经修改了，但他俩还是有高iso带着相当可笑杂声。我觉得太可笑了因为6400iso就像我的D80400的iso。当然了，D300的iso比我的D80高太多了。但是D700就更好了，更少的噪杂音，现在至少比D3便宜2000块

Answer 3

找网上即时翻译，很好使得。