Question

帮忙翻译一下下面的英文，万分感谢大家了

As part of the Commission's overall review of the bankruptcy system, the Service to the Estate and Ethics Working Group considered various practical aspects of the administration of bankruptcy cases. The Working Group focused its attention on the two administrative programs presently in place, the United States Trustee Program ("UST") and the Bankruptcy Administrator Program ("BA"). In a plenary voting session held on August 11-12, 1997, the Commission rejected the Working Group's two alternative proposals designed to eliminate the Judiciary's highly successful Bankruptcy Administrator Program by incorporating it into the UST system. On the first proposal, the vote was three in favor and five opposed; on the second proposal, the vote was two in favor and six opposed.
The Congress established the BA Program in 1986.Designed and developed in response to complaints and dissatisfaction with the UST Program, the BA Program was instituted in the six federal judicial districts in the states of Alabama and North Caroline. In fact, the Northern District of Alabama was one of the eighteen (18) pilot UST districts from 1978 to 1986, and it rejected the UST Program when it was expanded nationwide in 1986. The BA Program is housed in the Judicial Branch, while the UST Program is in the Executive Branch's Department of Justice. The BA Program is presently due to "sunset" on October 1, 2002.
At its regional meeting in Chicago on July 17, 1997, the Commissioners present heard and considered the comments of a panel of speakers concerning the existence of two separate administrative programs, housed in different branches of government, performing nearly identical functions. The panel included a BA, several present or former UST's, the Deputy Director of the Executive Office for U.S. Trustees, several sitting district and bankruptcy court judges, a practicing lawyer, and several academicians, including Prof. David Epstein, a well-known bankruptcy lawyer and former law school dean. The comments of the panelists centered on two major issues - the constitutionality and the desirability of maintaining two administrative systems.
At the Commission's regional meeting in Chicago, several panelists, notably those employed by the UST Program, favored the elimination of the BA Program, either by recommending to Congress that the BA's sunset date "remain unchanged" or by requiring the immediate conversion of BA districts into the UST Program. Those in favor of the proposals relied heavily on the decision in St. Angelo v. Victoria Farms, a 1994 decision from the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which held that the BA Program is unconstitutional, as being violative of the uniformity clause of the Constitution.

Answer 1

As part of the Commission's overall review of the bankruptcy system, the Service to the Estate and Ethics Working Group considered various practical aspects of the administration of bankruptcy cases. The Working Group focused its attention on the two administrative programs presently in place, the United States Trustee Program ("UST") and the Bankruptcy Administrator Program ("BA"). In a plenary voting session held on August 11-12, 1997, the Commission rejected the Working Group's two alternative proposals designed to eliminate the Judiciary's highly successful Bankruptcy Administrator Program by incorporating it into the UST system. On the first proposal, the vote was three in favor and five opposed; on the second proposal, the vote was two in favor and six opposed.
The Congress established the BA Program in 1986.Designed and developed in response to complaints and dissatisfaction with the UST Program, the BA Program was instituted in the six federal judicial districts in the states of Alabama and North Caroline. In fact, the Northern District of Alabama was one of the eighteen (18) pilot UST districts from 1978 to 1986, and it rejected the UST Program when it was expanded nationwide in 1986. The BA Program is housed in the Judicial Branch, while the UST Program is in the Executive Branch's Department of Justice. The BA Program is presently due to "sunset" on October 1, 2002.
At its regional meeting in Chicago on July 17, 1997, the Commissioners present heard and considered the comments of a panel of speakers concerning the existence of two separate administrative programs, housed in different branches of government, performing nearly identical functions. The panel included a BA, several present or former UST's, the Deputy Director of the Executive Office for U.S. Trustees, several sitting district and bankruptcy court judges, a practicing lawyer, and several academicians, including Prof. David Epstein, a well-known bankruptcy lawyer and former law school dean. The comments of the panelists centered on two major issues - the constitutionality and the desirability of maintaining two administrative systems.
At the Commission's regional meeting in Chicago, several panelists, notably those employed by the UST Program, favored the elimination of the BA Program, either by recommending to Congress that the BA's sunset date "remain unchanged" or by requiring the immediate conversion of BA districts into the UST Program. Those in favor of the proposals relied heavily on the decision in St. Angelo v. Victoria Farms, a 1994 decision from the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which held that the BA Program is unconstitutional, as being violative of the uniformity clause of the Constitution
作为该委员会对破产制度全面检讨的一部分，服务到村和伦理问题的工作组审议的破产案件的行政处理各种实际问题。工作组目前的重点是两个到位，美国信托计划（“科大”）和破产管理人的计划（“广管局”）的管理程序的关注。在全体会议表决八月11-12日，1997年举行的会议上，委员会拒绝了工作组的两个旨在消除科大系统纳入它的司法机构的破产管理人计划非常成功的替代建议。关于第一项建议，投票是三票赞成，五反对;关于第二个建议，投票是两票赞成，六反对。
这次大会确立了1986.Designed广管局计划和因应投诉，并与科大开发的计划表示不满，广管局计划是在6个联邦在阿拉巴马州和北加州司法区设立。事实上，在阿拉巴马州北部地区是十八（18）科大试点地区之一1978年至19​​86年，它拒绝了科大程序，当它在1986年扩大了全国。广管局计划是设在司法部门，而科大计划在行政部门的律政司。广管局方案目前由于“日落”10月1日，2002年。
在芝加哥地区会议07月17日1997年，本专员听取和审议了关于两个单独的行政程序的存在，不同的政府部门设发言人小组的意见，执行几乎相同的功能。小组成员包括学士学位，现任或前任几个科大的，对美国信托，坐几个区和破产法庭法官，执业律师执行办公室副主任，和几个院士，其中包括教授大卫爱泼斯坦，一个众所周知的破产律师，前法律学院院长。该小组成员的意见集中在两个主要问题 - 是否符合宪法和维护两个行政系统的可取性。
在委员会的区域会议在芝加哥，一些小组成员特别是那些由科大方案雇用，赞成广管局计划消除，无论是建议国会，广管局的夕阳日期“不变”或要求BA的地区立即转换进入科大计划。在赞成这些建议在很大程度上依赖于安杰洛诉圣维多利亚农场，从1994年上诉法院第九巡回决定，认为广管局计划是为是违宪的统一性条违规，决策宪法.
.

Answer 2

作为该委员会对破产制度全面检讨的一部分，服务到村和伦理问题的工作组审议的破产案件的行政处理各种实际问题。工作组目前的重点是两个到位，美国信托计划（“科大”）及计划管理人的管理程序及其注意
（“广管局”）。在全体会议表决八月11-12日，1997年举行的会议上，委员会拒绝了工作组的两个旨在消除科大系统纳入它的司法机构的破产管理人计划非常成功的替代建议。关于第一项建议，投票是三票赞成，五反对;关于第二个建议，投票是两票赞成，六反对。
这次大会确立了1986.Designed广管局计划和因应投诉，并与科大开发的计划表示不满，广管局计划是在6个联邦在阿拉巴马州和北加州司法区设立。事实上，在阿拉巴马州北部地区是十八（18）科大试点地区之一1978年至19​​86年，它拒绝了科大程序，当它在1986年扩大了全国。广管局计划是设在司法部门，而科大计划在行政部门的律政司。广管局方案目前由于“日落”10月1日，2002年。
在芝加哥地区会议07月17日1997年，本专员听取和审议了关于两个单独的行政程序的存在，不同的政府部门设发言人小组的意见，执行几乎相同的功能。小组成员包括学士学位，现任或前任几个科大的，对美国信托，坐几个区和破产法庭法官，执业律师执行办公室副主任，和几个院士，其中包括教授大卫爱泼斯坦，一个众所周知的破产律师，前法律学院院长。该小组成员的意见集中在两个主要问题 - 是否符合宪法和维护两个行政系统的可取性。
在委员会的区域会议在芝加哥，一些小组成员特别是那些由科大方案雇用，赞成广管局计划消除，无论是建议国会，广管局的夕阳日期“不变”或要求BA的地区立即转换进入科大计划。在赞成这些建议在很大程度上依赖于安杰洛诉圣维多利亚农场，从1994年上诉法院第九巡回决定，认为广管局计划是为是违宪的统一性条违规，决策宪法