Question

跪求翻译！要求：语言必须通顺。请好心的大哥帮帮忙，先谢谢了

Figure 5 shows the SEM images of the electrodes after
the reduction and annealing, and there are more
pores in electrode 2 (Figure 5b) than in electrode 1 (Figure
5a) and electrode CNT (Figure 5c). These pores are
in the micrometer scale, and the increased pore distribution
was proved by the N2 adsorption and desorption
isotherms (Figure 6a). The pore size distribution was calculated
by the Barrett
Joyner
Halenda (BJH) analysis
from N2 desorption isotherms. The distribution shows
that electrode 2 has large pores in the mesoporous
(20
500 Å) and macroporous (500 Å) regions. Also,
the pore size was extended to the micrometer scale for
the graphene composite electrode, which was formed
when the H2O and N2H4 were released from the anode
after the reduction and annealing.37 This means that the
incorporation of graphene will introduce a hierarchical
structure and increase the roughness factor, but the introduced
roughness did not increase the surface area.
The surface areas for electrode 1 and electrode 2 are
52.23 and 51.67 m2 g
1, respectively, calculated by the
multipoint Brunauer
Emmett
Teller (BET) method,
which are nearly the same, indicating that the graphene
composite electrode will not improve the dye absorption,
but the light scattering was increased based on the
UV
vis measurement (Figure 6b). The diffuse spec-trum shows that the introduced pore performs as a
light capture center, and the light scattering was increased
by 7% at all wavelengths compared to the traditional
electrode. The increased light scattering will improve
the photo-to-current conversion efficiency, but
because the increased light diffuse cannot transform to
the photoexcited electrons absolutely, the efficiency increased
by light scattering must be less than 7%. However,
the IPCE measurement shows the efficiency was
increased by 56%. That means the major improvement
is not attributed to the light scattering.

Answer 1

图5显示了SEM分析的电极
降低并且退火,而且有更多
孔隙中电极2(图5b)比电极1(图
壳聚糖5a)和电极(图5c)。这些是一类
在宏观尺寸的增加,孔隙的分布特征
验证了N2吸附和解吸吗
静态吸附等温线(图6a)。孔隙大小分布进行了数值计算
由BarrettJoynerHalenda BJH)分析(
从N2解吸静态吸附等温线。分布显示
2有毛孔粗大,电极在介孔
(20500 A)和大孔(500)地区。同时,
孔隙的大小在扩大到宏观尺寸
这graphene复合电极上,这也就形成了
当水和N2H4从阳极被释放
减少和annealing.37后,这也意味着在
graphene的公司将会介绍一个层次
结构和增加表面粗糙度的因素,但是引进的
表面粗糙度并不增加的区域。
电极表面区域1和电极2
52.23 51.67平方米,分别计算了g1期的
多点BrunauerEmmettTeller(BET)的方法,
这几乎一样,表明graphene吗
将不会改善复合电极的染料吸附效果,
但是光散射的基础上提高了
UVvis测量(图译林出版社)。弥漫的spec-trum表明,介绍了作为孔隙表演
光捕获中心、以及光散射是增加的
在全波段都有7%的相对于传统的
电极。光散射的增加将会得到改善
photo-to-current的转换效率,但是
因为增加光漫射不能变换
电子的photoexcited绝对,效率提高
通过光散射必须小于7%。然而,
测试显示IPCE效率的
增加了56%。这意味着重大改进
不是归因于光散射。

Answer 2

图5显示了电极的SEM照片后减少和退火，并有更多的在电极2毛孔（图5b）比电极1（图5a）和碳纳米管电极（图5c）。这些孔隙在微米尺度，增加的孔隙分布是证明了在氮气吸附和脱附等温线（图6a）。孔径分布计算由巴雷特？乔伊纳？Halenda（BJH）分析从脱附等温线。分布表明该电极2具有大毛孔中的孔（20？500 Å）和大孔（？500 Å）地区。此外，孔径扩展到微米尺度的石墨电极的复合材料，这是形成当H2O和N2H4释放了阳极在减少和annealing.37这意味着石墨烯团将推出一个层次结构，增加表面粗糙度的因素，但推出粗糙度并没有增加表面积。对电极的表面积1和2的电极52.23和51.67平方米克？1，分别由计算
多布鲁诺尔？埃米特？柜员机（下注）方法，这是几乎相同，这表明石墨复合电极不会提高染料的吸收，
但光散射的基础上增加紫外线？可见测量（图6b）。漫谱trum表明，引进的孔作为执行光能的捕获中心，光散射增加7％，在所有波长比传统电极。散射光的增加将提高的光电流转换效率，但因为增加光线漫不能转化为绝对的光生电子，效率提高光散射必须超过7％以下。然而，的光电转换量子效率的测量显示了效率
增加了56％。这意味着重大改善是不是由于光线散射。
你自己可以参考一下

Answer 3

图5显示了SEM分析的电极
降低并且退火,而且有更多
孔隙中电极2(图5b)比电极1(图
壳聚糖5a)和电极(图5c)。这些是一类
在宏观尺寸的增加,孔隙的分布特征
验证了N2吸附和解吸吗
静态吸附等温线(图6a)。孔隙大小分布进行了数值计算
由BarrettJoynerHalenda BJH)分析(
从N2解吸静态吸附等温线。分布显示
那电极2