急!!!请将这段文字翻译成英文,谢谢! 15
1月26日,蒋某在威远县南大街建设银行自动提款机上取现金时,发现他人遗忘在提款机上的一张银行信用卡,因遗忘人已将密码输入,蒋某遂分七次将信用卡上的现金9300元取走,占为...
1月26日,蒋某在威远县南大街建设银行自动提款机上取现金时,发现他人遗忘在提款机上的一张银行信用卡,因遗忘人已将密码输入,蒋某遂分七次将信用卡上的现金9300元取走,占为己有。事后,遗忘信用卡的失主发现后,到公安机关报案。公安机关通过银行自动提款机的监控(摄像头)设备,锁定蒋某多次提取信用卡失主卡内钱款的证据,遂将涉嫌犯罪的蒋某抓获,后以蒋某涉嫌信用卡诈骗犯罪,移交威远县法院刑事审判庭审理。庭审中,被告人蒋某表示很后悔,认为自己当初因一时贪念,犯下了罪行,但她认为自己的行为属于不当得利或构成侵占罪,愿意接受法律的制裁,但恳请法院能念及初犯,且主动退赔他人损失,请法院予以从宽处罚。
威远县法院认为,被告人蒋某在特定场所拾得他人的信用卡及密码,未经持卡人同意或授权,冒用他人信用卡骗取钱财,不再是民事违法行为,而侵占罪构成要件之一是拒不退还或拒不交出他人财物,前提是他人有索要行为,这与蒋某拾得他人信用卡并使用的行为特征不符,不能以侵占罪定性,其行为已构成信用卡诈骗罪,鉴于被告人蒋某已退赔被害人损失,故法院酌情作出如上判决。 展开
威远县法院认为,被告人蒋某在特定场所拾得他人的信用卡及密码,未经持卡人同意或授权,冒用他人信用卡骗取钱财,不再是民事违法行为,而侵占罪构成要件之一是拒不退还或拒不交出他人财物,前提是他人有索要行为,这与蒋某拾得他人信用卡并使用的行为特征不符,不能以侵占罪定性,其行为已构成信用卡诈骗罪,鉴于被告人蒋某已退赔被害人损失,故法院酌情作出如上判决。 展开
展开全部
January 26, JiangMou in vying county south street construction bank atms get cash, discover other forgotten in a bank credit card started, because people have forgotten password input, JiangMou hence points on a credit card seven times will take cash 93 yuan, accounting for for ourselves. Afterwards, forgotten after discovery, credit card owner to the public security organ report a case. Public security organs through the bank atms monitoring (cameras) equipment, locking JiangMou multiple extraction credit card owner CARDS money suspected criminal evidence, hence will JiangMou captured, in the JiangMou after suspected of credit card fraud crime, handed over county court criminal tribunals vying for trial. JiangMou says, the defendant's trial that his original regret, because of greed, committing crimes moment, but she thinks his behaviour is undeserved benefit or constitutes occupation crime, willing to accept legal sanctions, but will the court can read, and actively caught unlawfully taken another person's loss, please court to put punishment.
County court, the defendant vying JiangMou that picked up others in specific places without the credit card and password, holder agree or authorized, falsely use another credit card cheated, is no longer civil illegal behavior, and occupy sin constitutions are one of the refund or refused to hand over others refuses to goods, the premise is others have demanded behavior, this JiangMou picked up others with credit card and use of behavioral characteristics, can not to occupy sin not qualitatively, his behavior has constituted credit card fraud, in view of the defendant JiangMou has unlawfully taken, so the court loss discretion victim above judgment.
County court, the defendant vying JiangMou that picked up others in specific places without the credit card and password, holder agree or authorized, falsely use another credit card cheated, is no longer civil illegal behavior, and occupy sin constitutions are one of the refund or refused to hand over others refuses to goods, the premise is others have demanded behavior, this JiangMou picked up others with credit card and use of behavioral characteristics, can not to occupy sin not qualitatively, his behavior has constituted credit card fraud, in view of the defendant JiangMou has unlawfully taken, so the court loss discretion victim above judgment.
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
这两段当做一段是吧
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
对啊,孩子,哪一段啊
追问
嗯,对啊
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
哪一段???“急!!!请将这段文字翻译成英文,谢谢!
”
”
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询