Question

救命啊,高手帮我把下面的英文翻译成中文吧,谢谢哦!

Free Markets and growth

Adam smith,in his wealth of Nations (1776) is often give credit for starting the industrial revolution.Adam smith believed that selfishness,in an ethical sense,in not highly rated.howerer,in an economic sense,if we encourage individuals to believe that their own hard work would provide direct economic rewards to them ,this new “release” of human energy would set in motion economy growth.First,self-interest,freely expressed,would jump-start the economy.secondly,the gain falling to the hard-working individual could not be fully captured by this economic man. This is because in the quest to build personal wealth,one needs others.inevitably and automatically,he reasoned,an “invisisible hand” assured that the reach of the individual would produce benefits,even if unintended-for all others. Two concepts:the economic man(interested largely in himself) and the invisible hand became the twin pillars of capitalist or free market ideology.

The implication of this explosion in consumption are reflected,too, in a reluctance to pay taxes for the services that we expect from government.the growth of the government deficit reflects the disarray of an economy where gross national appetites have exceeded gross national product.

The free market classical economists offered important advice to any culture hoping to enjoy rapid economic growth or an improved future. the sacrifices of one generation set the stage for the potential for growth-but only if those who receive the funds(including governments)-make prudent use of those resources by investing in growth. Americans have neglected thisaxiom.they have neglected the needs of the future,and already the future is neglecting America. The high consumption low investment pattern has reduced productivity growth,and with that the rate of GNP growth. America’s future will be prosperous-as is the case for all ecomomics-only if we invest in that improved future. free market mechanisms is taken alone do not provide automatic prosperity . for the market is not a disembodiedfore that assures effortless or automatic prosperity. Growth is something that each generation must errn.g rowth generates a stock that each generation must leave as a legacy for the next generation.

Answer 1

自由市场和成长 亚当匠, 在他的财富国家(1776) 是授予信用为开始工业revolution.Adam 匠不高度经常相信那自私, 在道德感觉, 在rated.howerer, 在经济感觉, 如果我们鼓励个体相信他们自己的坚苦工作会提供直接经济奖励对他们, 这新"发行" 人的能量会设置在行动经济growth.First, 利己主义, 自由地被表达, jump-start economy.secondly, 获取下落对勤勉个体不能被这经济人类充分地夺取。这是因为在搜寻建立个人财富, 你需要others.inevitably 和自动地, 他辩解了, 个体伸手可及的距离会导致好处, 既使不愿意为其他的"invisisible 手" 确定。二concepts:the 经济主要man(interested 在他自己) 并且无形的手成为了资本家或自由市场思想体系双胞胎柱子。 这爆炸的涵义在消耗量被反射, 同样, 在勉强缴纳税我们期望从政府缺乏government.the 成长反射经济混乱总全国胃口超出了国内总产值的服务。 自由市场古典经济学家为任一文化提供了重要忠告希望享有迅速经济增长或改善的未来一个世代牺牲设置阶段为潜力为成长但只如果那些接受funds(including governments) 做慎密用途那些资源由投资在成长。美国人忽略了thisaxiom.they 忽略了未来的需要, 并且未来已经忽略美国。高消耗量低投资样式减少了生产力成长, 和与那GNP 成长的率。美国的未来兴旺和论点为所有如果将是我们投资由于改善的未来自由市场机制单独ecomomics-only 被采取不提供自动繁荣。为市场不是保证不出力或自动繁荣的disembodiedfore 。成长是某事, 各个世代必须errn.g rowth 引起各个世代必须留下作为一份遗产为下一代的股票。

Answer 2

自由市场和增长的斯密,在他的国家的财富(1776年)往往被归功为出发工业revolution.adam 史密斯认为,自私自利,在道德意义上说,没有高度rated.howerer,在经济上,如果我们鼓励个人认为自己 自己的辛勤工作将提供直接的经济回报,他们表示,这一新的"释放"人体能量将修练 经济growth.first,自我利益的自由表达,将启动economy.secondly,增益降至辛勤工作的个别不能完全避开这个经济 男子. 这是因为在寻求建立个人财富,人们需要others.inevitably并自动,他的逻辑是,一个"invisisible手"的保证 到达的个人所带来的益处,即使是无意的,为其他所有问题. 两个概念:经济人(有兴趣主要是自己)和无形的手,成为这两大支柱的资本主义或自由市场 思想. 这段话的含义爆炸消费都反映过, 一个不愿纳税的服务,我们期望从government.the增长的政府赤字反映 在纷乱的经济下,国民的胃口已经超过国民生产总值. 自由市场的古典经济学家提出了重要的意见,任何一种文化,希望在经济快速增长和改善 未来. 牺牲一代搭建舞台增长的潜力,但只有那些接受资金(包括 政府)审慎运用这些资源的投资增长. 美国人一直忽略thisaxiom.they忽略了未来的需求,并已成为今后美国忽视. 高消费低投资格局已降低生产力的增长,而到加国内生产总值的增长. 美国的未来将会繁荣-就象所有ecomomics-只要我们投入,改善未来. 自由市场的机制,是采取单独不提供自动繁荣. 对于市场并非disembodiedfore以保证effortless或自动繁荣. 生长做事,这是每一代人都必须errn.growthgenerates股票,每一代人都必须留下的遗产 给下一代.