Question

急!求高手帮我用法律英语翻译这段论文摘要。给力啊~

从各国对欺诈的基本内涵的规定上看，欺诈应是破坏意思自治原则并且违背诚实信用原则的行为，在欺诈构成要件中应包含这二类要件，一类是形式要件，说明行为是破坏意思自治原则；另一类是实质要件，说明行为是违背诚实信用原则。我国立法中没有关于欺诈构成要件的明确规定，司法实践中一般采用的是学术界的四要件说，这四要件仅仅是欺诈的形式要件，因此应加入违背诚实信用原则这一实质要件，完善我国立法。本文将首先探讨欺诈的概念定义，进而对国内外有关欺诈构成要件的相关学说以及我国关于期诈构成要件的立法实践进行介绍，并在此基础上对于引入诚实信用原则作为我国期诈构成要件的必要性进行分析。

Answer 1

According to the definition of fraud in different countries, fraud refers to the behaviors in violation of the principle of autonomy of will. There are two constitutive requirements for fraud, namely, formative condition that confirms behavior in violation of the principle of autonomy will, and substantial condition that confirms behavior in breach of the principle of good faith. There is no clear definition of fraud in China's legislation yet, and instead, the four elements theory which dominates the academic circle is commonly adopted in the judicial practices. But the four elements only provide formative condition for fraud, so violation of the principle of good faith should be introduced to improve the current legislation in China. The paper first explores the concept of fraud, then introduces theories about constitutive requirements for fraud at home and abroad, along with China's legislative practices over constitutive requirements for fraud, it also goes on to analyze the necessity to include the principle of good faith as a constitutive requirement for fraud in China.