Question

英语辩论用稿，求高手帮忙翻译成英文！拜托了

今天我方的观点是“并非全民可享政府提供的医保。”首先，我想先解释一下“全民医保”。全民医保指政府建立或举办的让所有公民，无论城乡，都能参加的医疗保险，是所有的人患病以后都能从政府的医疗保险制度那里得到帮助。所有人群不分地位，身份，性别，地区，收入，一律平等。
以上的解释我得自百度知道，从该解释中我抓到了三点重要的信息。1，政府建立。2保险。3全民共享，一律平等。我们首先看到的是要建立全民医保必须由政府牵头负责，而保险机构作为其中的重要角色，也必将参与其中。政府对医疗领域的进一步干预虽然在一定程度上有利于医疗资源的有效调配，但也必将是医疗服务及药品的市场化进程举步维艰；而保险机构对医疗保险领域的介入把供需双方的关系变成医疗供给方，需求方与医疗保险机构之间的三角关系，从而使医疗保险领域市场失灵的现象更加严重。
其二，我们讲的全民医保，是必须全民共享，所有公民一律平等的医保。再来反观我国现今的医保推进情况：现在我国只有2亿左右的居民拥有医疗保险，加上1.7亿农村地区的新型医疗合作保险，一共3.7亿人。然而众所周知的是我国的人口早就超过了13亿。也就是说人又10亿左右的公民是没有享受到医疗保险的。如果要将这10亿人包括到医保的范围中来，那么将需要多大的资金投入？我国的经济基础是否能够担负起这笔支出？这笔支出将从何而来？专家估计我国要建立能够覆盖全国的医保体系将至少需要5000亿人民币。5000亿对于80000亿的财政收入来说的确不是个大数字。但是我们难道能够因为全民医保而一下子大幅度的降低其他建设事业的支出吗？这是不现实的。另外，全民医保必定会大大加重财政负担。可以说全民医保是我国现阶段经济发展所无法承受的。第三，这笔钱由谁来出？2008年，中央曾向部分医保试点地区出台一项名为《试点法案》的暂时性法案，该法案对于资金来源的原则是“国家补助一点，地方安排一点，个人掏一点。”这听起来是多方出资，可实际上还不都是从纳税人身上来。也许通过全民医保，可以使你在遇到健康问题的时候得到更多的帮助，可是谁会因为将来可能出现的一种情况而不断掏出更多的税款呢？也许对于富人来说这只是小钱，但对于大量的中低阶层收入者来说，这一长期的税款将成为一大负担。
作为这个社会平凡的一份子，我们当然都是希望全民医保能够早日在这片土地上实现，但理想要切合现实，我们离这个目标还有很长的路要走。

Answer 1

Today our point of view is "not enjoy Government-provided health insurance for all. "First of all, I would like to explain the" universal coverage ". Universal coverage means established or organized by the Government for all citizens, both urban and rural areas, are able to participate in a medical insurance, is after all human illness can obtain help from the Government health insurance system. All people regardless of their status, identity, gender, region, income equality.
Above explanation I derived from Baidu know, I had caught from the interpretation of three important information. 1, the Government established. 2 insurance. 3 full shares, are equal. First thing we see is to establish universal coverage must be led by the Government is responsible for, and the Insurance Authority as one of the important role, will also participate. On medical field further government intervention although to some extent conducive to effective allocation of medical resources, but it will also be struggling in the process of marketization of medical services and medicines and insurance institutions in the field of medical insurance intervention into medical supply side of the relationship of both supply and demand, demand side and the triangular relationship between the health insurance institutions, so that the medical insurance market failure is more serious in the area.
Second, we speak of universal healthcare is the need to share for all, equality of all citizens of health insurance. Looking back at today's healthcare push in China: only about 200 million people in China now have health insurance, plus a 170 million new cooperation medical insurance in rural areas, a total of 370 million people. However as we all know that our population would have exceeded 1.3 billion. That is one of around 1 billion citizens are without access to medical insurance. If you want to include into the scope of coverage to 1 billion people, how much money you will need? China's economic base is able to assume this expense? The spending will come from? Experts estimate China to set up a nationwide health care system will require at least 500 billion RMB. 500 billion is really not a big number for 8 trillion fiscal revenue. But we can do because the construction of universal coverage and significantly reduce other expenditures of the cause of it? This is not realistic. In addition, universal coverage will greatly increase the financial burden. Can say that universal healthcare is of China's economic development cannot afford at this stage. Third, who is going to come out of the money? In 2008, central to some Medicare pilot region had introduced a temporary Bill named the pilot Bill, principles for sources of the Act is "State subsidies, arranging a point where individual cut. "It sounds is funded can actually not all come from the taxpayers. Perhaps through universal healthcare can make you feel in the face of health problems for more help, but who is constantly pulled out because of a condition that may occur in the future more tax it? Maybe for the rich, it's only money, but for a large number of lower middle class earners, this term will become a heavy burden of the tax.

Answer 2

Today, our view is "not entitled to government provided universal health insurance." First, I would like to elaborate on the "universal health care." Universal health care means the establishment or organized by the government for all citizens, regardless of urban and rural areas, can participate in health insurance, sick people after all can the medical insurance system from the get help. All people regardless of status, identity, gender, region, income, should be equal.
I have explained above from Baidu know that I caught from the three points to explain important information. 1, the Government established. 2 insurance. 3 universal access, are equal. We first see is to establish universal health care must be led by the government, and insurance institutions as one of the important role and will also participate. Further government intervention in the medical field although beneficial to some extent, the effective allocation of medical resources, but it will be the market of medical services and pharmaceutical process difficult; and insurance institutions involved in the field of health insurance to change the relationship between supply and demand into the medical supply side,
The demand side and the health insurance triangular relationship between, so that the medical insurance field the phenomenon of market failure is more serious.
Second, we speak of universal health care, must be universal access, equality of all citizens in health care. Contrast, today's health care again to promote our situation: Today, China is only around 200 million residents have health insurance, plus 170 million in rural areas, the new cooperative medical insurance, a total of 370 million people. But we all know that China's population already over 1.3 billion. That is about one billion people and citizens do not enjoy medical insurance. If you want the 10 million people, including the scope of health insurance in the past, it will require much capital investment? China's economic foundation is able to assume the expenses?
This expenditure will come from? Experts estimate that China should establish a nationwide health insurance system will need at least 500 billion yuan. 500 billion in revenue for the eight trillion is indeed not a big number. But we can do because of universal health care and other sudden drops in construction spending it? This is unrealistic. In addition, the universal health care will surely greatly increase the financial burden. Universal health care can be said at this stage of economic development in China can not afford. Third, who is out of money? In 2008, the central part of the Medicare pilot areas had issued a "pilot
Bill "a temporary bill, which is the principle source of funding for" state aid that the local arrangements that people dig it. "This sounds multi-funded, but in fact are not they all come from taxpayers. Perhaps through universal health insurance, you can make your time in the face of health problems get more help, but who because of a situation that may arise in the future constantly pulled out more tax it? Perhaps it is only a little money to rich people, but for a large number of medium and low class income for the long term will be a big tax burden.
As part of this community extraordinary, of course we all want universal health care as early as possible to achieve in this land, but the ideal to be realistic, we are from that goal is still a long way to go.