Question

谁能帮我翻译一篇文章（英译汉）

Treatment of asylum seekers
As a starting point, we believe that it is necessary to consider the current Australian government's treatment of asylum seekers. There are legitimate humanitarian concerns about the system of mandatory detention and the way that the issue of asylum seekers in general has been so politicised. The Australian government's treatment of asylum seekers is at best misconceived, and is both mean-spirited and degrading of Australian politics by fostering division. With leadership and action, the solution is relatively simple in that it relates to the physical treatment and processing of asylum seekers, with several clear practical solutions (eg, the abolition of mandatory detention, the establishment of community-based systems for processing asylum seekers, and the speeding up of visa processing).
It is also necessary to separate treatment of asylum seekers from policies on acceptance of asylum seekers and border control issues in general. Current treatment of asylum seekers is inhumane and unnecessary, regardless of what Australia’s immigration policy is.

Global responsibilities & aid
In considering immigration, there is a secondary issue of why people need to flee their homelands. Given that many asylum seekers are escaping political repression and war, there is an onus on Australia to take a proactive role in opposing human rights abuses, in bilateral relations and international forums. Australia also needs to recognise the role of overseas aid in reducing dislocation and enhancing the role of civil society and community organisations in recipient countries.
Australia’s Overseas Direct Aid is at a historical low (0.25% of Australia's GNP) under the current Howard government, and should be increased to meet the United Nations target of 0.7 percent of GNP as a matter of urgency.
There is another question of how aid is applied. In future scenarios based on continued global warming, it will be necessary for Australia to review how it delivers aid, especially to communities who are grappling with the impacts of human-induced climate change.

Resource consumption
Australia has the highest per capita greenhouse gas (GHG) emission rates of any industrialised nation, at about 27.2 tonnes per person per year (1). This is twice the average level of other wealthy countries and 27% higher than emissions per person in the United States (21.4 tonnes). Our energy intensive economy and lifestyle is typical of the developed world, which has been responsible for over 80% of all GHG emissions from human sources on the planet. Australia, with only 20 million people, produces around 1.1% of global emissions (2).With this many people we should be producing around 0.31% of global emissions if we were consuming a fair share.

Answer 1

治疗寻求庇护者

作为一个起始点,我们相信,有必要考虑当前澳大利亚政府的治疗的寻求庇护者。有合法的人道主义问题有关该系统强制拘留和这个议题的庇护寻求者一般是如此泛政治化了。澳大利亚政府的处理是最好的寻求庇护者,而错误,都是卑鄙的,通过促进降解的澳大利亚政治分裂。具有领导和行动,解决的办法是相对简单的,因为它涉及的物理治疗和处理与几个明显的寻求庇护者,在切实可行的解决方案(比如,废除强制拘留,建立以社区为基础的系统,为加工的寻求庇护者,和机动化进程的加快,签证办理)。

它也是必要单独处理的寻求庇护者被接受为从政策和边境管理问题寻求庇护者在一般。目前的治疗的寻求庇护者是不人道的,没有必要的,不管什么是澳大利亚的移民政策。

世界责任和援助

在考虑移民,那里是一个次要问题的人们为什么要逃离祖国。考虑到许多避难者正在逃亡的政治压迫和战争,是有一个注入澳大利亚采取积极的角色在反对人权、以及在双边关系及国际论坛。澳大利亚也需要承认的角色错位海外援助在降低的作用,加强公民社会和社区组织在接受者的国家。

澳大利亚的海外直接援助是处于历史较低(0.25%,澳大利亚的国民生产总值)在当前霍华德政府,应该增加,以满足联合国目标0.7百分点GNP的立场上的紧迫性。

还有另一个问题援助申请。在未来的情况的基础上继续全球变暖,这将是必要的让澳大利亚一下它提供援助,尤其是对社区的影响是谁的应对人类活动引起的气候变化。

资源消耗

澳大利亚有最高的人均温室气体(温室气体)排放速率的工业化国家,大约每人每年27.2吨(1)。这是平均水平的两倍其他富裕国家和27%高于人均排放量在美国(275795吨)。我们的能源密集型经济和生活方式,是典型的发达国家,一直负责所有的温室气体排放量超过80%的地球上从人类来源。澳大利亚,在仅仅20万人,产生约1.1%的排放量占全球总排放量的(2)以这许多人我们应该日产0.31%排放量占全球总排放量的如果我们消费公平分赃

Answer 2

好长，野生手工翻译求200分