高分!求一英文高手帮忙翻译下,法律专业方面的毕业论文摘要,谷歌金山什么的就不要啦!!!

侦查人员出庭作证制度在大多数英美法系国家已得到确立,但是该制度在我国设立与否却一直备受争议。近年来,经过部分地区先行探索的实践经验,证明该制度在我国建立具有其必要性和可行... 侦查人员出庭作证制度在大多数英美法系国家已得到确立,但是该制度在我国设立与否却一直备受争议。近年来,经过部分地区先行探索的实践经验,证明该制度在我国建立具有其必要性和可行性。随着我国司法制度的不断改革和发展,建立并推行侦查人员出庭作证制度已经具备了其法律基础、理论基础和实践基础。并且,侦查人员出庭作证有利于排除非法证据,保护被告人的合法权益,提高诉讼效率,体现程序正义,因此,在我国构建侦查人员出庭作证制度显得迫在眉睫。
本文通过查阅英美法系和大陆法系对于侦查人员出庭作证制度的相关规定,并对我国侦查人员出庭作证的现状、特点,以及出现这种现象的原因进行概括、总结,分析出在我国实施正查人员出庭作证制度的可行性和必要性,最终提出构建该制度的一些建议。除了通过立法规范侦查人员出庭作证的证人资格、作证范围、作证程序外,本文还提出了对于拒绝出庭作证的侦查人员采用惩罚措施以保证制度的实施,且有助于带动普通证人出庭作证,形成良好的社会风气,最终实现司法程序和实体的双重正义。
展开
 我来答
笑颜傲马1133
2011-05-28 · TA获得超过5.5万个赞
知道大有可为答主
回答量:2.8万
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:3541万
展开全部
论文下载的方很多,不过一般都不便宜,建议你去taobao的;翰林书店;店铺。我去那里下载过,超级便宜 很快
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
上海宣瑞教育
2023-12-21 广告
上海宣瑞教育信息咨询有限公司提供ShineWrite的英文论文修改服务,提供业内低价格和快速度的专业编辑服务,每位编辑都是英文母语专家,拥10000小时以上的经验,还提供完善的质量保障并免费重修语言问题。用户遍布国内上千所高校、研究所、期刊... 点击进入详情页
本回答由上海宣瑞教育提供
百度网友4890a7aad
2011-06-07
知道答主
回答量:14
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:9.6万
展开全部
  System of investigators testifying in court has been established in most countries of the Common-Law System.However,it is controversial that the system should be established in China or not.In recent years,some areas get practical experience through the first exploration.And the practical experience proved that the system established in our country has the necessity and feasibility.With the judicial system reforming and developing,we are ready to establish and carry out the system of investigators testifying in court.And that is based on the theory,legislation,and practice.And investigators to testify is favorable for for eliminating illegal evidence,protecting the legitimate interests of the accused,improving the efficiency of the proceedings,reflecting the procedural justice.Therefore building the system of investigators testifying in court seems imminent in our country.
  In this paper,we has consulted the relevant provisions of system of investigators testifying in court in Common-Law System and Civil-Law System,summarized the situation,fingerprint and the reasons for this phenomenon of the system in our country,analyzed that the necessity and feasibility to carry out the system in our country.Finally,we can proposed some suggestions about building this system.In this paper,in addition to suggest standardize the competence,scope and the procedure of the investigators testified in court by legislation,the author set forth some measures to punish investigators who refuses to testify in court that for ensuring the implementation of the system.This will help to promote common witness to testify,to form a good social atmosphere,and ultimately to achieve judicial justice of both entity and process.
本回答被提问者采纳
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
筱小苧_
2011-05-29
知道答主
回答量:1
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:0
展开全部
Investigators testify in court system in most common law countries has been established, but whether or not the system set up in China has been much debated. In recent years, after the first parts of exploring the practical experience proved that the system established in our country with its necessity and feasibility. With the continuous reform of the judicial system and the development, establishment and implementation of the investigators to testify in court system already has its legal basis, theoretical and practical foundation. And investigators to testify in favor exclusionary rule to protect the legitimate interests of the accused, efficiency of the proceedings, reflecting the procedural justice, therefore, in our system of building the investigators to testify in court seems imminent.
Through access to common law and civil law systems for the detection of the relevant provisions of staff to testify in court, and the status of our investigators to testify in court, characteristics, and the reasons for this phenomenon to generalize, summarize, analyze in China Implementation of the investigating officers to testify in court system is the feasibility and necessity of the final proposal of building some of the recommendations of the system. In addition to legislative norms of witnesses investigators qualified to testify range, evidence procedures, this paper proposes for the refusal to testify in the punitive measures used by investigators to ensure the implementation of the system and help promote common witness Testify to form a good social atmosphere, and ultimately double the judicial process and the entity justice.
追问
谷歌翻译不要,还是谢谢你!
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
收起 更多回答(1)
推荐律师服务: 若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询

为你推荐:

下载百度知道APP,抢鲜体验
使用百度知道APP,立即抢鲜体验。你的手机镜头里或许有别人想知道的答案。
扫描二维码下载
×

类别

我们会通过消息、邮箱等方式尽快将举报结果通知您。

说明

0/200

提交
取消

辅 助

模 式