Question

求助：帮忙翻译成中文！ 急 急 急 哪位大哥大姐好心 英语好的帮我翻译一下 非常感谢！！

Introduction
Maintaining coherence between international trade law, international environmental law, and general international law presents a challenge for theory, legal doctrine, and state practice. The challenge is particularly evident when analysing how the international system - and the WTO in particular - can avoid conflicts between the goals of trade liberalization and environmental protection. The interpretation of GATT Article XX has begun to play a critical role in defining the relationship between different branches of international law.

GATT Article XX sets out fields of regulation in which WTO members are free to employ trade measures that would otherwise be inconsistent with GATT obligations. This limited freedom to use trade measures can be exercised at the national level or in other international agreements. Article XX thus plays a central role in determining "where decisions should be made ... for different subjects"(to borrow John Jackson's phrase) and, as a result, provides a key to understanding how decision-making authority is to be allocated among national governments and international institutions.

A relatively small number of disputes has arisen over the years regarding the application of Article XX exceptions to trade measures to achieve health or environmental goals. Some of these cases involved measures ostensibly aimed at protecting an interest inside the enacting country. Others involved measures aimed at changing the environmental policies of other WTO members. While few in number, these cases have left some interesting questions unresolved. No clear pattern has emerged regarding the matters covered by paragraph XX(b) and those covered by paragraph XX(g). Likewise, the issue of whether there is an implied jurisdictional limit in these paragraphs remains an open question. Thus, both the relationship between the headings of Article XX and the relationship between Article XX and general international law regarding the jurisdiction of states provide fertile ground for analysis. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development ("OECD") has developed a conceptual framework based on proximity-of -interest. This article shows how this framework can be applied to clarify the relationship between paragraphs XX(b) and XX(g) and to advance the jurisdictional analysis under Article XX.

Answer 1

介绍
维护之间存在一致性国际贸易法、国际环境法,和一般国际法理论,提出了一种挑战,和国家法律学说的实践。面临的挑战是如何特别明显当分析国际系统——和世界贸易组织——能避免冲突特定目标的贸易自由化与环境保护。第二十条《关贸总协定》的解读已经开始扮演了一个非常关键的角色之间的关系在定义各种各样的国际法律。

第二十条规定了关贸总协定规定在这领域的WTO成员贸易措施是自由地使用,否则会不符合关贸总协定的义务。使用这个有限的自由贸易措施可以行使,在国家层面上,或以其他的国际协议。第二十条从而起到核心作用”,在这里,决定在确定应…因为不同的主题”(借用约翰杰克逊的词组),因此,提供了一个关键在于了解决策的权力是被分配在国家政府以及国际机构。

一小部分争议。在过去的几年里已经出现了关于应用的第XX例外的贸易措施,实现卫生或环境的目标。这些涉及的一些措施旨在保护人们的兴趣表面内制定的国家。其他措施,旨在改变有关的其他WTO成员的环保政策。虽然数量很少,这些案例已经留下了一些有趣的问题未得到解决。没有明确的模式已经出现有关事项所涵盖的XX(b)款所涵盖的段落,XX(g)。同样地,这个问题是否存在一项默示管辖权限制在这些段落仍然是个谜。因此,两者之间的关系,文章的标题的文章XX,XX之间的关系及一般国际法律对于管辖权
机器翻译 太长