Question

一道曾经的GRE逻辑题，老师改了问法，本人的逻辑实在转不过来，希望了解这种题型的人帮忙分析一下~谢谢

A study of attitudes towards prime time television programs showed that programs with identical ratings in terms of number of people watching received highly divergent marks for quality from their viewers. This additional piece of information could prove valuable for advertisers, who might be well advised to spend their advertising dollars for programs that viewers feel are of the high quality.
Q:What conclusions might an advertiser draw from the above information?
最好写一下分析过程~~

Answer 1

study (towards ...) showed that programs with identical ratings (in terms of ...) received divergent marks for quality from their viewers. This additional piece of information could prove valuable for advertisers, who might be well advised to spend (...) dollars for programs that viewers feel are of the high quality.

conclusion:
收视率高的节目,观众不一定认为质量高;所以,广告商会挑选收视率高,又有合适的(在这儿,是高质量的)质量的节目或者频道,放上去广告.

追问

那我是不是可以说conclusion:
Viewers' perceptions of the quality of television programs could be valuable for advertisers，they will advertise for programs that viewers feel are of the high quality. ?