Question

请帮忙翻译一下，谢谢啦

Killing for Sport
It wouldn’t be quite true to say that “some of my best friends are hunters.” Still, I do number among my respected acquaintances some who not only kill for the sake of killing but count it among their keenest pleasures. And I can think of no better illustration of the fact that men may be separated at some point by fathomless abyss yet share elsewhere much common ground. To me, it is inconceivable that anyone can think an animal more interesting dead than alive, I can also easily prove, to my own satisfaction, that killing “for sport” is the perfect type of that pure evil for which metaphysicians have sometimes sought.
Most wicked deeds are done because the doer proposes some good for himself. The liar lies to gain some end; the swindler and the thief want things which, if honestly got, might be good in themselves. Even the murderer is usually removing some impediment to normal desires. Though all of these are selfish or unscrupulous, their deeds are not gratuitously evil. But the killer for sport seems to have no such excusable motive. He seems merely to prefer death to life, darkness to light. He seems to get nothing other than the satisfaction of saying: “Something which wanted to live is dead. Because I can bring terror and agony, I assure myself that I have power. Because of me there is that much less vitality, consciousness and perhaps joy in the universe. I am the spirit that denies.” When a man wantonly destroys one of the works of man, we call him “Vandal.” When he wantonly destroys one of the works of God, we call him “Sportsman.”
The hunter-for-food may be as wicked and as misguided as vegetarians sometimes say, but he does not kill for the sake of killing. The ranchers and the farmers who exterminate all living things not immediately profitable to them may sometimes be working against their own best interests; but whether they are or not, they hope to achieve some supposed good by the exterminations, if to do evil, not in the hope of gain but for evil’s sake, involves the deepest guilt by which man can be stained, then killing for killing’s sake is a terrifying phenomenon and as strong a proof as we could have of the “reality of evil” with which present-day theologians are again concerned.

Answer 1

杀戮运动
它不会真的说:“我的一些最好的朋友不是猎人。”但我还是在我尊敬的熟人数量有些人不仅杀死为了杀死但数它在他们热切的乐趣。我想没有比这更好的说明这样一个事实,男人可能在某些点分离无尽的深渊分享其他地方还多共同点。对我而言,它是不可思议的,任何人都可以认为一个更有趣的动物死亡比活着,我也可以很容易的证明,令自己满意,造成“运动”是最完美的类型的形上学者纯粹的邪恶的人有时追求的目标。
因为大多数的罪恶勾当者提出了一些适合自己。说谎者谎言来获得一些端;那骗子和小偷想要东西,如果有,可能很诚实,对自己有信心。即使是凶手通常去掉一些正常的障碍的欲望。尽管所有这些都是自私的,无耻的,他们的行为都是不免费邪恶。如果俄罗斯运动好象没有这样情有可原的动机。他看上去只是喜欢死亡,黑暗到光明,中间需要的生活。他似乎把别的事,只将较满意的说:“一些想住是死的。因为我可以把恐怖和痛苦,我保证我有力量。因为我有那么多的生命力,也许少意识和欢乐的宇宙。我的精神。当一个人否认大肆破坏一个人的作品,我们叫他做“Vandal。”当他大肆破坏一个神的作品,我们叫他做“运动员。”
hunter-for-food可能是邪恶的,有时是素食者误导说的,但他不杀为了杀戮。农场主和农民的消灭所有活的东西不能立即有利可图有时可能会在他们自身最大利益的能力;但是,不论是否他们是对或错,他们希望达到某种应该有了杀人,如果要行恶,我不指望嘎

可以下个翻译软件试试！学习愉快啊！

Answer 2

杀戮运动

它不会真的说:“我的一些最好的朋友不是猎人。”但我还是在我尊敬的熟人数量有些人不仅杀死为了杀死但数它在他们热切的乐趣。我想没有比这更好的说明这样一个事实,男人可能在某些点分离无尽的深渊分享其他地方还多共同点。对我而言,它是不可思议的,任何人都可以认为一个更有趣的动物死亡比活着,我也可以很容易的证明,令自己满意,造成“运动”是最完美的类型的形上学者纯粹的邪恶的人有时追求的目标。

因为大多数的罪恶勾当者提出了一些适合自己。说谎者谎言来获得一些端;那骗子和小偷想要东西,如果有,可能很诚实,对自己有信心。即使是凶手通常去掉一些正常的障碍的欲望。尽管所有这些都是自私的,无耻的,他们的行为都是不免费邪恶。如果俄罗斯运动好象没有这样情有可原的动机。他看上去只是喜欢死亡,黑暗到光明,中间需要的生活。他似乎把别的事,只将较满意的说:“一些想住是死的。因为我可以把恐怖和痛苦,我保证我有力量。因为我有那么多的生命力,也许少意识和欢乐的宇宙。我的精神。当一个人否认大肆破坏一个人的作品,我们叫他做“Vandal。”当他大肆破坏一个神的作品,我们叫他做“运动员。”

hunter-for-food可能是邪恶的,有时是素食者误导说的,但他不杀为了杀戮。农场主和农民的消灭所有活的东西不能立即有利可图有时可能会在他们自身最大利益的能力;但是,不论是否他们是对或错,他们希望达到某种应该有了杀人,如果要行恶,我不指望增益,但对恶的缘故,涉及到最深的有罪的人可以弄脏了,然后杀死杀死的缘故是一个可怕的现象和强烈的证据,照我们能有“恶”的现实与当代神学再担心。

Answer 3

才十分啊~~~~