三个英语作文,每篇150-200字,写的好会有加分奖励。复制粘贴的赶紧走远点,我是没时间写了。高手请进。
1.Shouldweencourageprivatecarsinbigcity?2.Companiesshouldnotjudgethejobapplicantsonly...
1. Should we encourage private cars in big city?
2. Companies should not judge the job applicants only by their educational certificates?
3. Is smorking that bad?
很急 ,需今天搞定 展开
2. Companies should not judge the job applicants only by their educational certificates?
3. Is smorking that bad?
很急 ,需今天搞定 展开
展开全部
Nowadays, an increasing number of private cars are being driven in big cities. Whether we encourage such cars in big city hasn’t reached a consensus.
Some people support to encourage private cars for several reasons. First of all, the development of economy determines more and more people have demand for private cars. People can afford to buy a car and thus it is unreasonable to restrict such demand. Essentially, such demand will stimulate economy to develop further. Secondly, most people live far away from their working place so it is necessary to own a car to provide convenience for daily commute and other activities.
On the contrary, a good many people disagree to purchasing private cars in big cities. Their concern is mainly about the deteriorating environmental and serious traffic problem in big cities. The more private cars on the road, the poorer the air and the traffic is. Moreover, these cars consume too much energy, which affects other industry.
I think we shouldn’t encourage private cars especially in big cities. Along with the above mentioned disadvantages caused by cars, I think people’ health will be affected if relying too much on cars.
193个词,支持者认为经济发达了人会对车有需求,这种需求又会刺激经济进一步发展;而且城市里很多人住得远,需要车提供便利。反对者认为私家车越多,环境和交通越差。我认为不应该鼓励,除了以上弊端,过度依赖车会损害健康。
It is arguably that quite a number of companies tend to give priority to applicants whose educational certificates are better.
The supporters believe that it is inevitable to do so. Firstly, it costs too much time to select all the resumes one by one. Maybe there are indeed certain applicants, who graduated from less famous colleges or schools, are qualified for their vacant. But such percentage is too small to worth spending valuable time in identifying them. Besides, it is agreed extensively that people with better educational certificates show greater potential and ability after being hired.
However, the opponents argue that such behavior is unfair and short sight. For one thing, the imperfect educational system which has been proved by many cases shows that educational background doesn’t mean everything. It is personality and morality that determine one’s final achievements. For another, a good company should have the capability to train its workers. Whoever being trained properly can perform excellently. So applicants even without good educational certificates should not be discriminated.
In my opinion, many celebrities don’t have outstanding educational certificates, such as Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, which prove that talent and effort can change everything.
196个词。虽有争议很多企业选人的时候倾向优先选择学历不错的应聘者。支持者认为企业没有那么多时间挨个挑选简历,学历低的可能有优秀的,但比例太小不值得花时间鉴别;其次高学历的人展示出更大的潜力和能力被广泛认同。
反对者认为这样做不公平而且短视。首先许多案例表明不完善的教育体系下高学历不代表一切,性格和道德根本上决定一个人的最终成就。而且好的公司应有培训员工的能力,任何人培训得当,都能干得出色。
我觉得很多名人都没有杰出的教育证书,例如乔布斯和盖茨,这说明努力和天赋能改变很多。
The arguments about disadvantages of smoking have long existed and still it is being concerned.
The medical research and other fields try their best to prove scientifically that smoking causes too much problems. The primary one is that smoking results in all kinds of diseases, among which asthma and lung cancer are two of the most frequently mentioned. Secondly, maybe more importantly, smoking has negative effect not only on smokers, but also on people around the smokers. Many protestors strongly condemn smokers’ influence on women and children. Also, a pregnant smoker may damage her baby’s health. In addition, too much fire is contributed to careless smokers. Heavy losses in human lives and property arouse much attention.
Nonetheless, it is unlikely to prohibit smoking entirely. Smokers protest this is against their basic human rights. And they hold a strong belief that everyone should have the freedom of choice.
I agree that smoking is bad. And I hope correspondent regulations are issued to forbid people smoking publicly.
字数够了,第三篇翻译写不下了,这个最简单,编的我最费劲。前两篇从没写过还觉得写起来有意思。
Some people support to encourage private cars for several reasons. First of all, the development of economy determines more and more people have demand for private cars. People can afford to buy a car and thus it is unreasonable to restrict such demand. Essentially, such demand will stimulate economy to develop further. Secondly, most people live far away from their working place so it is necessary to own a car to provide convenience for daily commute and other activities.
On the contrary, a good many people disagree to purchasing private cars in big cities. Their concern is mainly about the deteriorating environmental and serious traffic problem in big cities. The more private cars on the road, the poorer the air and the traffic is. Moreover, these cars consume too much energy, which affects other industry.
I think we shouldn’t encourage private cars especially in big cities. Along with the above mentioned disadvantages caused by cars, I think people’ health will be affected if relying too much on cars.
193个词,支持者认为经济发达了人会对车有需求,这种需求又会刺激经济进一步发展;而且城市里很多人住得远,需要车提供便利。反对者认为私家车越多,环境和交通越差。我认为不应该鼓励,除了以上弊端,过度依赖车会损害健康。
It is arguably that quite a number of companies tend to give priority to applicants whose educational certificates are better.
The supporters believe that it is inevitable to do so. Firstly, it costs too much time to select all the resumes one by one. Maybe there are indeed certain applicants, who graduated from less famous colleges or schools, are qualified for their vacant. But such percentage is too small to worth spending valuable time in identifying them. Besides, it is agreed extensively that people with better educational certificates show greater potential and ability after being hired.
However, the opponents argue that such behavior is unfair and short sight. For one thing, the imperfect educational system which has been proved by many cases shows that educational background doesn’t mean everything. It is personality and morality that determine one’s final achievements. For another, a good company should have the capability to train its workers. Whoever being trained properly can perform excellently. So applicants even without good educational certificates should not be discriminated.
In my opinion, many celebrities don’t have outstanding educational certificates, such as Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, which prove that talent and effort can change everything.
196个词。虽有争议很多企业选人的时候倾向优先选择学历不错的应聘者。支持者认为企业没有那么多时间挨个挑选简历,学历低的可能有优秀的,但比例太小不值得花时间鉴别;其次高学历的人展示出更大的潜力和能力被广泛认同。
反对者认为这样做不公平而且短视。首先许多案例表明不完善的教育体系下高学历不代表一切,性格和道德根本上决定一个人的最终成就。而且好的公司应有培训员工的能力,任何人培训得当,都能干得出色。
我觉得很多名人都没有杰出的教育证书,例如乔布斯和盖茨,这说明努力和天赋能改变很多。
The arguments about disadvantages of smoking have long existed and still it is being concerned.
The medical research and other fields try their best to prove scientifically that smoking causes too much problems. The primary one is that smoking results in all kinds of diseases, among which asthma and lung cancer are two of the most frequently mentioned. Secondly, maybe more importantly, smoking has negative effect not only on smokers, but also on people around the smokers. Many protestors strongly condemn smokers’ influence on women and children. Also, a pregnant smoker may damage her baby’s health. In addition, too much fire is contributed to careless smokers. Heavy losses in human lives and property arouse much attention.
Nonetheless, it is unlikely to prohibit smoking entirely. Smokers protest this is against their basic human rights. And they hold a strong belief that everyone should have the freedom of choice.
I agree that smoking is bad. And I hope correspondent regulations are issued to forbid people smoking publicly.
字数够了,第三篇翻译写不下了,这个最简单,编的我最费劲。前两篇从没写过还觉得写起来有意思。
展开全部
第一篇已经写了 现在我就给你补充后面两个 写得不好的地方见谅啊
Companies should not judge the job applicants only by their educational certificates?
As it's known to us all,nowadays many companies only keep an eye on educational certificates when choosing their employees .That is to say ,they sufficiently believe that applicants' abilities only revevant to their diplomas,which caused widely confusion.
First of all,wo should not deny that good universities can bring up qualified employees,because they have more opportunities to get access to some top equipments that allows them to do the practise
which may not be possible in the general colleges.This's just a comparision between top university and normal ones,not to metion the gap betwween educated ones and the drop-outs.
But when taking people's experience into account,wo can see the drawback of this way.A lot of student with only poor college diplomas or even lower do things more skilled .The same case may also happend when it comes ti communication.
It's hard to say whether judging the job applicants only by their educational certificates is good or not.But ,in my oppinion,to take in more talents ,companies must diversify their way.
Is smorking that bad?
In recent years ,many people turned their face on cigarettes,which is totally a threat to health in their eyes.But smokers do still exist in many courntries.So it's necessary to pay some attetion to the question:is smoking that bad?
Many people hate it when some one else smoking near them,they can not bear the smog.It;s true that the smog is harmful to our bodies.what's more ,long time smoking does great harm to people's lungs,the damege can be clearly seen from the smokers' teeth.In these occasions,smoking is bad .
But why people smoke ?When they are troubled by their headaches,they need a cigarette to bring them relief.Some contents in the cigarette,can make one more clear-headed which dose great help when we are dimmed.
Each coin has two sides,cigarettes canbring both harm and benifits.My suggustion is smoking when there's no other choice.
Companies should not judge the job applicants only by their educational certificates?
As it's known to us all,nowadays many companies only keep an eye on educational certificates when choosing their employees .That is to say ,they sufficiently believe that applicants' abilities only revevant to their diplomas,which caused widely confusion.
First of all,wo should not deny that good universities can bring up qualified employees,because they have more opportunities to get access to some top equipments that allows them to do the practise
which may not be possible in the general colleges.This's just a comparision between top university and normal ones,not to metion the gap betwween educated ones and the drop-outs.
But when taking people's experience into account,wo can see the drawback of this way.A lot of student with only poor college diplomas or even lower do things more skilled .The same case may also happend when it comes ti communication.
It's hard to say whether judging the job applicants only by their educational certificates is good or not.But ,in my oppinion,to take in more talents ,companies must diversify their way.
Is smorking that bad?
In recent years ,many people turned their face on cigarettes,which is totally a threat to health in their eyes.But smokers do still exist in many courntries.So it's necessary to pay some attetion to the question:is smoking that bad?
Many people hate it when some one else smoking near them,they can not bear the smog.It;s true that the smog is harmful to our bodies.what's more ,long time smoking does great harm to people's lungs,the damege can be clearly seen from the smokers' teeth.In these occasions,smoking is bad .
But why people smoke ?When they are troubled by their headaches,they need a cigarette to bring them relief.Some contents in the cigarette,can make one more clear-headed which dose great help when we are dimmed.
Each coin has two sides,cigarettes canbring both harm and benifits.My suggustion is smoking when there's no other choice.
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
Should we encourage private cars in big city?
There's no doubt that a private car can sometime offer much convenience for a person living a big city. With a car, one can escape from the crowded public transportation such as bus and MRT.
However, I don't think it is a good idea to encourage private cars in big city for the following reasons. Firstly, the big city often with dense population, will be terribly crowded if the number of private car keeps rising, which probably leads to less efficiency of city transportation. More cars, less speed. Secondly, the pollution problem caused by the vehicle exhaust will continue to annoy the citizens. We still have a long way to go to achieve low-carbon life. Last but not least, considering from the living standard of the citizens, we should encourage people to use the green vehicle such as bicycle more often. Only with the joint efforts, can we achieve the goal of green city and health lifestyle.
There's no doubt that a private car can sometime offer much convenience for a person living a big city. With a car, one can escape from the crowded public transportation such as bus and MRT.
However, I don't think it is a good idea to encourage private cars in big city for the following reasons. Firstly, the big city often with dense population, will be terribly crowded if the number of private car keeps rising, which probably leads to less efficiency of city transportation. More cars, less speed. Secondly, the pollution problem caused by the vehicle exhaust will continue to annoy the citizens. We still have a long way to go to achieve low-carbon life. Last but not least, considering from the living standard of the citizens, we should encourage people to use the green vehicle such as bicycle more often. Only with the joint efforts, can we achieve the goal of green city and health lifestyle.
追问
仁兄写的非常好,请问能否将剩下两个题目也写下 ,谢谢。会有更多分数的
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
Should we encourage private cars in big city?
There's no doubt that a private car can sometime offer much convenience for a person living a big city. With a car, one can escape from the crowded public transportation such as bus and MRT.
However, I don't think it is a good idea to encourage private cars in big city for the following reasons. Firstly, the big city often with dense population, will be terribly crowded if the number of private car keeps rising, which probably leads to less efficiency of city transportation. More cars, less speed. Secondly, the pollution problem caused by the vehicle exhaust will continue to annoy the citizens. We still have a long way to go to achieve low-carbon life. Last but not least, considering from the living standard of the citizens, we should encourage people to use the green vehicle such as bicycle more often. Only with the joint efforts, can we achieve the goal of green city and health lifestyle. 追问仁兄写的非常好,请问能否将剩下两个题目也写下 ,谢谢。会有更多分数的
There's no doubt that a private car can sometime offer much convenience for a person living a big city. With a car, one can escape from the crowded public transportation such as bus and MRT.
However, I don't think it is a good idea to encourage private cars in big city for the following reasons. Firstly, the big city often with dense population, will be terribly crowded if the number of private car keeps rising, which probably leads to less efficiency of city transportation. More cars, less speed. Secondly, the pollution problem caused by the vehicle exhaust will continue to annoy the citizens. We still have a long way to go to achieve low-carbon life. Last but not least, considering from the living standard of the citizens, we should encourage people to use the green vehicle such as bicycle more often. Only with the joint efforts, can we achieve the goal of green city and health lifestyle. 追问仁兄写的非常好,请问能否将剩下两个题目也写下 ,谢谢。会有更多分数的
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询