Question

翻译 要经典一点

As we noted in the preface, our earlier work on subjective mental health (Bryant
&Veroff,1984) led us to conclude that something vital was missing from the
literature,on psychological well-being. In particular, the process of coping with
stress had no positive counterpart. But if people make self-assessments of their
ability to handle negative experiences in their lives, then surely they must also
make self-assessments of their ability to enjoy positive experiences.We contend
that savoring is this missing process--the positive counterpart of coping.
This hook and the conceptual analysis and empirical research presented in it
are meant to fill this gap in literature. we posit that people have capacities
to attend to, appreciate, and enhance the positive experiences in their lives.This is
the basic conceptual definition of savoring we use throughout this book.we call
those capacities ,capacities to savor, and the processes underlying those capacities, savoring.
From research on coping (see Compas, Connor, Osowiecki,&Welch, 1997;
Lazarus&Folkman, 1984), we know that people use a range of different types
of coping strategies to handle stress. For example, people may use active prob-
lem solving, social support, prayer, cognitive reappraisal, formal help seeking,
wishful thinking, escape-avoidance, denial, or substance abuse to help them
cope with their problems. Some of these approaches to coping may even involve
active attention to the good things in one`s life，what seems like savoring, but
such-mechanisms were seen in the coping literature as "breathers" or "sustain-
ers,"or as ways to avoid stress, not as ways to heighten positive experiences for
their own sake (Lazarus,Kanner,&Folkman1980). Within the mental health
literature, theorists and researchers have been careful to distinguish the pro-
cess of coping, that is, the thoughts and behaviors that people use to modify
stressful circumstances and to minimize potential threat, from its outcome, that
is, the consequences of coping.This is important distinction has guided theory
and research on stress management and adjustment, and it has been valuable
in helping us better understand the processesinvolved in dealing with anxiety,
depression, misfortune, and illness.

Answer 1

正如我们在序言中指出，我们的主观心理健康的早期工作（科比
Veroff，1984年）使我们得出结笑袭论，一些重要的是缺少
文学，心理福祉。特别是，应对的过程
压力没有积极对应。但是，如果人们使他们的自我评估
有能力处理他们生活中的负面经验，那么可以肯定，他们还必须
使他们能够享受积极experiences.We的自我评估抗衡
，品尝这是丢失的过程 - 积极应对对口。
   这个钩子和它的概念分析和实证研究
是为了填补这一差距在文学。我碰裂兄们断定，人有能力
顾不上欣赏，并加强在他们lives.This的积极经验是
品尝我们用整个book.we呼叫的基本概念的定义
这些能力，细细品味的能力，以及潜在的这些能力，品尝的过程。
   从应对（见COMPAS，康纳，Osowiecki，韦尔奇，1997年的研究;
拉撒路福克曼，1984年），我们知道，人们使用一系列不同类型的
处理压力的应对策略。例如，人们可以使用活跃的概率
LEM解决，社会支持，祈祷，认知重评，正式求助，
一厢情愿，逃避避税，拒绝，或滥用药物，以帮助他们
配合他们的问题。其中的某些方法来应对，甚至可能涉及
积极关注在一个生命的好东西，什么似乎想品尝，但
这样的机制被视为“呼吸”或“维持在应对文学
雇员再培训计划“，或方法，以避免不作为的方式，以提高积极经验的强调，
自己着想（拉撒路，Kanner，Folkman1980）。在精神健康
文学理论家和研究者已经仔细辨别亲
应对塞斯，也就是说，人们使用的思想和行为修改
压力的情况下，尽量减少潜在的威胁，其结果，
coping.This的后果是重要的区别指导理论
研究压力管理和调整，并源让已宝贵的
在帮助我们更好地理解在处理与焦虑processesinvolved，
抑郁症，不幸和疾病。