Question

谁把下面的英语翻译成中文 太谢谢了 。高手们啊，帮帮忙啊，急用

1 The challenge: abduction
To understand the complex and sometimes puzzling field of design practices we have to realize that they have been developed in response to a particular need. It would be impossible to really understand design or even to find commonality in the incredibly diverse array of design practices without first refering back to the core challenge of design.

To build up a conceptual framework that is fundamental enough to anchor the variety of approaches that designers take, and connect the many descriptions of design thinking that have arisen in design research, it may be strategic to temporarily suspend the generation of ‘rich’ descriptions of design and instead take a ‘sparse’ account as our starting point. Logic provides us with a group of core concepts that describes reasoning in design and other professions. A ‘sparse’ description derived from logic will help us to explore whether design is actually very different from other fields e and should provide us with some insight on the potential value of introducing elements of design practic into other fields. In this paper we will move from these spartan beginnings to ‘richer’ descriptions of design.

To get to the heart of design thinking we build on the way fundamentally different kinds of reasoning are described in formal logic, in particular the way Roozenburg has described the work of Peirce in the context of design (Roozenburg & Eekels, 1995). We will describe the basic reasoning patterns definition to both the problem and the potential solution space within which an answer can be sought.

Answer 1

建立一个概念框架，是基本足够的锚各种办法，设计师，和连接许多描述的设计思想已经出现在设计研究，它可能是战略暂时停止产生丰富的描述，设计需要的稀少的帐户，作为我们的起点。逻辑为我们提供了一组核心概念，介绍了推理的设计和其他行业。一个稀疏的描述来自逻辑将帮助我们探索是否设计实际上是迪ff不同其他fi领域，应为我们提供了一些见解的潜在价值要素的设计实践引入到其他fi领域。本文将从这些斯巴达开始丰富的描述的设计。

去心设计思路，我们建立的方式根本不同类型的推理描述在形式逻辑的方式，特别roozenburg描述了皮尔士的工作范围内的设计（roozenburg与伊科斯，1995）。我们将描述的基本推理模式的fi定义双方的问题和潜在的解决方案的空间内，答案可寻。

Answer 2

挑战：诱拐
为了能够理解复杂并且有时很令人费解的设计实践领域，我们必须意识到为了能够应对特殊需要，他们已经的道理很好的发展。在这个如此变化多端的设计领域，如果没有预先研究设计的核心挑战，想真正理解设计甚至找到共性是几乎不可能的。

Answer 3

这个挑战:绑架
　　理解复杂的,有时候莫名其妙的设计领域练习中,我们必须意识到他们已经发展回应一个特别的需要。它不可能真正理解设计甚至发现他们的共性的令人难以置信的各种各样的设计实践第一指没有回到核心挑战的设计。
　　
　　建立一个概念框架来锚定是基本足够日