Question

哪位高人帮我分析一下，单词我都明白为什么句子就不懂了呢？？？

2020 Economic Trends and Prediction Possibilities
The price of gold appears to be heading towards a manic buying climax. The short term could see
prices rocket further, and then fall back down when buyers flee. This may especially be true if the US
can strengthen its dollar.
If this happens and the recovery of the oil price with the economy then the consumer confidence would
return slightly, individuals and families may be more apt to taking vacations and traveling and more
individuals would start purchasing more goods.
This possibility always lingers in the shadows. Stock prices trade far above their book value levels and
at massive multipliers to cash and assets. One day, investors could realize that it is only their
perception holding this investment structure up. If they quit believing, it may cease to exist. Although
this is not an economic trend liable to happen any time soon, it is a possibility.
The economy reverts to the barter system. Again, money only has value because the government says
it does and makes any disagreement punishable by law. But what would happen if the average person
no longer wanted to be paid in paper turned out by mints and instead wanted actual produce that was of
immediate value to them? What if people started to question what backs the value of currency other
than a governmental promise?
Consider this:
At some point the Roman soldier wanted to quit being paid in salt.

Answer 1

2020年经济趋势与预测的可能性
黄金的价格似乎正在向一个狂燥的购买的高潮。短期内可以看到
火箭进一步价格,然后落后买主逃跑。这可能特别是真实的,如果美国
能加强它的美元。
如果这一切发生的时候,石油价格的复苏经济然后消费者信心
还小,个人和家庭可能更容易度假、旅顷孙游和更多
个人将开始购买更多的商品。
这种可能性总是徘徊在阴影中。股票价格贸易远远高于账面价值水平毁乎余和
在大量乘数效应较小,现金和资产。有一天,投资者可能会意识到,这仅仅是他们的
感知持有这投资结构。如果他们放弃相信,它可能停止存在。虽然
这不是一个容易发生经济趋势很快,它是有可能的。
经济则归易货系统。再次,钱只有有价值,因为政府说
它的存在使任何分歧可由法律规定。但纤滚会发生什么事如果普通人
不再想要多少薪水在纸的薄荷糖,而转的实际生产需要
即时珍惜他们呢?如果人们开始质疑支持货币的价值
比政府保证吗?
想想这个:
从某种意义上说,罗马士兵想离开是为了补偿盐。

Answer 2

语法问题