Question

宾语与补语的区别

在胡壮麟的《语言学教程》中He changed trains at Fengtai.这里的trains为什么不是宾语而是补语,是因为这里的句子不可用被动语态吗？（Trains were changed by him at Fengtai.)The sentence is strange.
补语与宾语的界限在哪里？请举例详细说明，万分感谢！
我从小接触的语法也是这样说的。补语不单是指宾补与主补吧。Modern linguists (eg.Chomsky , Halliday )suggest that object refers to such an item that it can become subject in a passive transformation..
Trains were changed by him at Fengtai.The sentence is strange.
trains here is a comp.

Can you give a powerful explanation?

Answer 1

change train 转车 补语
change the train 这里应该是宾语，是动作的承受者
(个人看法)

Answer 2

He changed trains at Fengtai. 可以肯定trains是宾语，而不是宾语补足语。

追问

我从小接触的语法也是这样说的。补语不单是指宾补与主补吧。Modern linguists (eg.Chomsky , Halliday )suggest that object refers to such an item that it can become subject in a passive transformation..
Trains were changed by him at Fengtai.The sentence is strange.
trains here is a comp.

Can you give a powerful explanation?

追答

你上面这段话是哪里来的？怎么到处是语法错误？是你打字的问题还是原文？