Question

能不能帮忙翻译一下，谢谢了，非常急，拜托了

State succession : recent developments
State practice has been, however, insufficiently uniform to provide evidence of clear rules of international law. In many cases, particularly in the period following the Second World War during which many former colonial territories attained independence, bilateral arrangements were made governing some or all aspects of the succession which was taking place; but even if they could be regarded as reflecting rules of customary international law applying to the kind of succession with which they were dealing, they were not directly relevant for other circumstances in which state succession might occur. In addition, many states felt that the earlier practice gave undue prominence to the major imperial powers and not enough to those of the newer members of the international community, many of whom had of course become international persons in circumstances involving state succession. It was against this background that the law of state succession was placed on the agenda of the International Law Commission. The Commission decided to deal with the subject in two stages, first covering the law of state succession in relation to treaties, and then moving on to state succession in relation to other matters(this was later made more specific by dealing with succession in relation to property, archives and debts). Successive reports by the special rapporteurs appointed by the International Law Commission led to draft articles on the two aspects being presented by the Commission in 1974 and 1981 respectively. These draft articles formed the basis for consideration at conferences held in Vieena in 1977-78 and 1983, which led to the Vieena Conventions on, respectively, the Succession of States in respect of Treaties, and on Succession of States in respect of State Property, Archives and Debts. Both Conventions require 15 ratifications or accessions before they enter into force. By 1 January 1991 neither Convention had acquired enough ratifications or accessions to do so.

Answer 1

国家继承：最近的事态发展国家实践已经，然而，不够统一提供明确证据的国际法规则。在许多情况下，特别是在后二战期间，许多前殖民地获得独立，双边安排作了某些或所有方面的继承这是发生；但即使他们可能被视为反映习惯国际法规则应用于类的继承与他们打交道，他们不直接相关的其他情况下，可能会发生国家继承。此外，许多国家认为，早期的实践给过分突出的大帝国的权力，没有足够的新的国际社会的成员，他们中的许多人当然成为国际人在涉及国家继承情况。正是在这种背景下，法律的国家继承放在议程的国际法律委员会。委员会决定处理的题目，在第一阶段，涉及国家继承法律关系的条约，并在国家继承有关的其他事项（这是后来作了更具体的处理继承与财产，档案和债务）。连续被任命的特别报告员的报告，国际法委员会领导的条款草案方面正在由委员会在1974和1981分别。这些条款草案的基础上形成的审议会议在vieena在1977 - 78年和1983，这导致vieena公约，分别，这个国家在条约方面的继承，以及关于国家对国家财产，档案和债务。这两项公约需要15个批准或加入才能生效。1一月1991无论公约获得了足够的批准或加入这样做

Answer 2

国家继承:最近的发展
　　国家实践,然而,不够统一明确的规定,提供证据,国际法的。在许多情况下,尤其在期结束后第二次世界大战期间,许多前殖民领土获得独立,双边安排一些或所有管理方面所发生的继承,但即使他们可以被看作是反映通用国际法规则进行了亲切