Question

哪位英语高手帮忙翻译一下下面的短文 谢谢~

Analyses
The three-step procedure advocated by Baron and Kenny (1986)
was used to test the assumed mediating roles of anxiety and selfconfidence
in the relation between self-esteem and claimed
self-handicapping. First, each potential mediator (cognitive and
somatic anxieties, self-confidence) was regressed on the independent
variable (self-esteem). Second, the dependent variable
(claimed self-handicap) was regressed on each potential mediator.
Third, the dependent variable was regressed on both the independent
variable and each potential mediator. There is a mediating
effect of a potential mediator if significant links are found at the
first two steps and if the relation between the independent variable
and the dependent variable is no longer significant (perfect mediation)
or is reduced (partial mediation) when the mediator is
introduced into the equation (third step). In addition, the significance
of the mediated effect was calculated using a Sobel test.
Results
To test the direct relationship between self-esteem and claimed
self-handicapping, claimed self-handicapping was regressed on
self-esteem. A significant overall model [F(1, 66) ¼ 9.32, p <.01,
R2 ¼.12] was found and self-esteem was a significant negative
predictor of claimed self-handicapping (b¼.35, p <.01).
To test the relationship between self-esteem and the potential
mediators, each potential mediator was regressed on self-esteem.
Regressing cognitive anxiety on self-esteem yielded a significant
effect [F(1, 66)¼9.32, p <.01, R2 ¼.12]. Self-esteem was a significant
negative predictor of cognitive anxiety (b¼.35, p< .01).
Regressing somatic anxiety on self-esteem did not yield a significant
effect [F(1, 66) ¼ 3.73, p >.05, R2 ¼ .05]. Regressing selfconfidence
on self-esteem yielded a significant effect [F(1, 66) ¼
18.92, p <.001, R2 ¼.22]. Self-esteem was a significant positive
predictor of self-confidence (b ¼ .47, p< .001).
Finally, the relationship between self-esteem and claimed selfhandicapping
was tested again with the influence of each
remaining potential mediator controlled (i.e., cognitive anxiety and
self-confidence). Regressing claimed self-handicapping on both
cognitive anxiety and self-esteem yielded a significant effect [F(2,
65)¼ 4.6, p <.05, R2 ¼.12]. Self-esteem significantly negatively predicted self-handicapping (b¼.34, p< .01) but cognitive
anxiety did not. Regressing claimed self-handicapping on both selfconfidence
and self-esteem yielded a significant effect [F(2, 65) ¼
8.04, p < .001, R2 ¼ .19]. Self-confidence significantly negatively
predicted claimed self-handicapping (b¼.30, p< .05), whereas
self-esteem did not. To summarize, self-confidence, but not
cognitive anxiety, was found to mediate the relationship between
self-esteemand claimed self-handicapping (see Fig.1).

Answer 1

分析
所倡导的三步骤过程男爵和肯尼(1986)
被用来测试假定的调停角色的焦虑和自信吗
在自尊之间的关系,并声称
自我设限。首先,每个潜在的中介(认知和
体细胞焦虑,自信)是独立的回归
变量(自尊)。第二,因变量
(声称self-handicap)是在每个潜在的中介回归。
第三,因变量是在两个独立的回归
变量和每个潜在的调解人。有一种调和的
一个潜在的中介效果,如果发现有联系的
前两个步骤,如果独立变量之间的关系
和相关的变量不再显著(完美的中介)
或者是减少(部分中介)当中介
引入方程(第三步)。此外,意义
中介效果的计算使用Sobel测试。
结果
为了测试有直接关系的自尊和声称
归因,声称是在回归自我设限
自尊。一个显著的整体模型[F(66)¼9.32,p <,
R2¼。12]被发现和自尊是一个重大的负面
预测声称(b¼自我设限。35岁,p <)。
为了测试自尊之间的关系和潜在的
调解人,调停者是倒退了每个潜在的自尊。
对自尊回归认知焦虑产生显著
效应[F(66)¼,p < 9.32。01,R2¼.12点)。自尊是一个巨大的
负面的预测(b¼认知焦虑。35岁,p <)。
对自尊回归躯体焦虑没有产生显著
效应[F(66)¼3.73,p >。05赛季,R2¼. 05)。回归自信
对自尊产生显著效应[F(66)¼
18.92,p <。001年,R2¼口径]。自尊是一个重要的正面
自信的预测(b¼。47岁,p < .)。
最后,自尊之间的关系,并声称的关系
再次测试影响的每个
剩余的潜在中介控制(例如,认知焦虑和
自信)。回归自我设限都声称
认知焦虑和自尊产生显著效应[F(2
65)¼4.6,p <。05赛季,R2¼.12点)。自尊显著负面自我设限(b¼预测。34,p <),但认知
焦虑没有。声称在两个自信回归自我设限
和自尊产生显著效应[F(65)¼
8.04,p <。001年,R2¼.19点)。自信比率呈显著负
预测声称(b¼自我设限。30日,p < . 05),而
自尊没有。总结一下,自信,但不是
认知焦虑,被发现来协调关系
self-esteemand声称(见图1)自我设限。

望采纳~~~或赞同~~~~~谢谢

Answer 2

分析
　　所倡导的三步骤过程男爵和肯尼(1986)
　　被用来测试假定的调停角色的焦虑和自信吗
　　在自尊之间的关系,并声称
　　自我设限。首先,每个潜在的中介(认知和
　　体细胞焦虑,自信)是独立的回归
　　变量(自尊)。第二,因变量
　　(声称self-handicap)是在每个潜在的中介回归。
　　第三,因变量是倒退了两届

Answer 3

除了这些，我们还会交流英语学习经验，用英语谈一谈我们多彩的校园生活。我觉得这次夏令营活动会大大提升我的英文水平同时我也会在那交到很多朋友。我真希望