Question

考研英语问题 谢谢啦!

so the researchers concentrated on those “surprise” disappearances by directors under the age of 70. They fount that after a surprise departure， the probability that the company will subsequently have to restate earnings increased by nearly 20%. The likelihood of being named in a federal class-action lawsuit also increases， and the stock is likely to perform worse. The effect tended to be larger for larger firms. Although a correlation between them leaving and subsequent bad performance at the firm is suggestive， it does not mean that such directors are always jumping off a sinking ship. Often they “trade up.” Leaving riskier， smaller firms for larger and more stable firms.
问题一、the company will subsequently have to restate earnings increased by nearly 20% have to restate earnings 不是说have to do sth 吗？ 可是have to后面是名词我不理解啊。 所以这句话我翻译不出来。
问题二、The likelihood of being named in a federal class-action lawsuit also increases 是说他会被上诉的几率增大吗？
问题三、the stock is likely to perform worse 不是说他的股票很差吗？怎么答案选D
　23. According to the researchers from Ohio University after an outside director‘s surprise departure， the firm is likely to .
　　[A]become more stable
　　[B]report increased earnings
　　[C]do less well in the stock market
　　[D]perform worse in lawsuits
这一题选D

Answer 1

问题已桥老、have to restate earnings 是一而再再而三提及公司收入
问题二。 是说公司被联邦集体起诉的几率增大。不是上诉。。。
问题三。因为a surprise departure使得敏喊升the company have to restate earnings by nearly 20%。一旦被发现不渗备实，就会being named in a federal class-action lawsuit also increases，继而and the stock is likely to perform worse，自然对大公司来说，结果更为糟糕。 而这之间的联系又将导致公司bad performance is suggestive。自然，公司胜诉不大。A 与原文意思不符。B increased earnings 并非真正增长。C。文中只讲了the stock is likely to perform worse，并不代表公司在股市表现不佳。 (个人意见，仅供参考)

Answer 2

答案是C啊，怎么会选D看错了吧

Answer 3

答案就是c呀

Answer 4

答案D

Answer 5

档案D