Question

翻译！！！！！！！！

刚辩方队友无论从一辩还是四辩都在试图证明男人应该休产假，难道男人不休产假就不算是负责人吗？显然不是。
我方则认为男女有其自然分工，男主外挣钱女主内，现状已然很合理，强调男人要休产假，这样做给各方带来的实际损害。主要理由有三点：第一，企业利益受制。现在是男权社会，男人是社会的主要劳动力，让男人休产假可能导致公司或企业的员工稳定性受到影响，人才流失，进而降低其生产力与效率；第二，不利于男性的职业生涯的持续稳定升级，尤其当其为家中财政收入的重要来源，甚至支柱来源时，现在工作和生活压力都很大，休假与不休假对于夫妻来说都很犹豫，他们内心都很渴望享受这个待遇，但这会更能带来失业危机，有谁甘愿冒这个险呢？这个看似人性化的假期，会造成不小的经济损失，甚至还有可能成为事业上的绊脚石，得不偿失。

Answer 1

Just a debate whether from the defense teammates or four debate trying to prove a man should be maternity leave, can't a guy endlessly maternity leave is not charge? Apparently not. We are think that men and women have the natural division of labor, male master into the money inside, the current situation is very reasonable, emphasize the man to maternity leave, do it to bring the parties of the actual damage. The main reason to have three points: first, the enterprise through interests. Now is the patriarchal society, man is the social main labor, let a man take maternity leave may lead to company or enterprise employees affected the stability, the brain drain, which reduces its productivity and efficiency; Second, go against the men of career steady upgrade, especially when the home for an important source of revenue, and even pillar source, now work and life pressure are large, vacation and don't leave for couples are very hesitant, at heart, they are very eager to enjoy the treatment, but it will more can bring unemployment crisis, who is willing to take the risk?

Answer 2

Just the teammates either from a debate or four debates are trying to prove that a man should take maternity leave, the man is on maternity leave is not responsible for people? Obviously not.

I think women and men have the natural division, male advocate outside money women inside, situation is very reasonable, emphasize that the man to take maternity leave, do so to bring the actual damage. Main reason has three points: first, the interests of enterprises subject. It is a patriarchal society, men are the main labor force, let a man take maternity leave may lead to the company or the enterprise staff stability is affected, the loss of talented people, which reduces productivity and efficiency; second, is not conducive to a male occupation career continuously upgrade, especially when it is home of the important source of fiscal income, or even sources of support, living and working pressure is very great, leave and don't leave for couples are very hesitant, their hearts are very eager to enjoy this treatment, but it can bring more unemployment crisis, who are willing to risk it? This seemingly humane vacation, will result in no small economic loss, and may even have become a cause of a stumbling block, the loss outweighs the gain.

Answer 3

Or four defence and defence team-mate from a debate in trying to prove that a man should be on maternity leave, man over maternity leave will not be in charge of it? Apparently not.
We think it has a natural Division of labour between women and men, men outside the home earning money at home, the status quo is very reasonable, stressed the men to take paternity leave, it brings to parties for actual damages. There are three main reasons: first, the business interests hostage. Now is men right social, men is social of main labor, let men Hugh maternity leave may led to company or enterprise of staff stability was effect, talent loss, turn reduced its productivity and efficiency; second, does not conducive to male of professional career of continued stability upgrade, especially Dang its for home in the revenue of important sources, even pillar sources Shi, now work and life pressure are is large, vacation and does not vacation for couples, are is hesitated, they inside are is desire enjoy this treatment, but this will more can brings unemployment crisis, So who is willing to take that risk? This seemingly friendly holiday, can cause big economic losses, even on what could be the cause of a stumbling block, is worth.

Answer 4