帮忙英语翻译~~急急急
按照你的图纸,现在销轴是不锈钢,套筒是碳钢。套筒是有问题的,两端的壁厚太薄了,只有1.23MM,而渗碳层深度是0.7~~0.9,很容易裂的套筒虽然是可以做的,但是它设计的...
按照你的图纸,现在销轴是不锈钢,套筒是碳钢。
套筒是有问题的,两端的壁厚太薄了,
只有1.23MM,而渗碳层深度是0.7~~0.9,很容易裂的
套筒虽然是可以做的,但是它设计的尺寸不合理,
肯定会开裂.会给你们在生产上带来麻烦
我想问图纸是否被修改过?
我不要用翻译器翻译的, 展开
套筒是有问题的,两端的壁厚太薄了,
只有1.23MM,而渗碳层深度是0.7~~0.9,很容易裂的
套筒虽然是可以做的,但是它设计的尺寸不合理,
肯定会开裂.会给你们在生产上带来麻烦
我想问图纸是否被修改过?
我不要用翻译器翻译的, 展开
9个回答
展开全部
按照你的图纸,现在销轴是不锈钢,套筒是碳钢。
套筒是有问题的,两端的壁厚太薄了,
只有1.23MM,而渗碳层深度是0.7~~0.9,很容易裂的
According to the drawing you gave us, at present, the pin axle is made of stainless steel and the sleeve is made of carbon steel. But there‘s a problem on the sleeve, the walls at both ends are too thin; with the depth of the carburized layer between 0.7~~0.9, a thickness of 1.23 mm for the sleeve walls can crack easily.
套筒虽然是可以做的,但是它设计的尺寸不合理,
肯定会开裂.会给你们在生产上带来麻烦
我想问图纸是否被修改过?
There‘s no problem for us to make the sleeve, but I think the design measurements are not logical, it will definitely crack and bring problems to your production process.
Can you tell me whether the drawing had been modified before?
【英语牛人团】
套筒是有问题的,两端的壁厚太薄了,
只有1.23MM,而渗碳层深度是0.7~~0.9,很容易裂的
According to the drawing you gave us, at present, the pin axle is made of stainless steel and the sleeve is made of carbon steel. But there‘s a problem on the sleeve, the walls at both ends are too thin; with the depth of the carburized layer between 0.7~~0.9, a thickness of 1.23 mm for the sleeve walls can crack easily.
套筒虽然是可以做的,但是它设计的尺寸不合理,
肯定会开裂.会给你们在生产上带来麻烦
我想问图纸是否被修改过?
There‘s no problem for us to make the sleeve, but I think the design measurements are not logical, it will definitely crack and bring problems to your production process.
Can you tell me whether the drawing had been modified before?
【英语牛人团】
展开全部
According to your drawings, now pin shaft is stainless steel, carbon steel sleeve is.
Sleeve is in question, both ends of the wall thickness is too thin,
Only 1.23 MM, and carburizing layer depth is 0.7 ~ 0.9, it is easy to crack
Sleeve is can do though, but it's not the size of the reasonable design,
Will craze. Will give you trouble in the production
I want to ask whether drawing has been modified?
Sleeve is in question, both ends of the wall thickness is too thin,
Only 1.23 MM, and carburizing layer depth is 0.7 ~ 0.9, it is easy to crack
Sleeve is can do though, but it's not the size of the reasonable design,
Will craze. Will give you trouble in the production
I want to ask whether drawing has been modified?
本回答被网友采纳
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
According to your drawings now pins are stainless steel, carbon steel sleeve
is.
Sleeves have a problem, at both ends of the wall thickness is too
thin,
Only 1.23MM, and carburizing layer depth is 0.7~~0.9, it is easy to
crack
Sleeves can be done, but its design size is unreasonable,
Will
definitely crack. on production will also give you trouble
I would like to
ask whether the drawings have been modified?
纯人工翻译的,希望能帮到你,
is.
Sleeves have a problem, at both ends of the wall thickness is too
thin,
Only 1.23MM, and carburizing layer depth is 0.7~~0.9, it is easy to
crack
Sleeves can be done, but its design size is unreasonable,
Will
definitely crack. on production will also give you trouble
I would like to
ask whether the drawings have been modified?
纯人工翻译的,希望能帮到你,
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
The pin (axes) is made from stainless steel and the sleeve is made from carbon steel as indicated in the drawing. Sleeve wall is too thin (1.23mm) to take 0.7~0.9 mm carburized layer that may induce crack on it. Sure it can be made, but crack will happen due to dimension is not resonably designed to have trouble in the proudction. What I want to know if the drawing was modifed or not?
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
According to your drawings, now pin shaft sleeve is stainless steel, carbon steel.The sleeve is a problem, the ends of the wall is too thin,Only 1.23MM, and carburized layer depth is 0.7~~0.9, very easy to crack.The sleeve is can do, but it is not the size of the reasonable design,Will crack. Will give you trouble in productionI want to ask the drawings are being modified?
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
According to yours blueprint, sells the axis now is the stainless steel, the sleeve is the carbon steel.
The sleeve has the question, both sides wall thickness too has been thin,
only then 1.23MM, but the cementation zone depth is 0.7~~0.9, although the very easy crack
sleeve is may do, but it designs the size is unreasonable,
definitely can crack. Can give you to bring in the production troubles
me to want to ask whether the blueprint has been revised?
The sleeve has the question, both sides wall thickness too has been thin,
only then 1.23MM, but the cementation zone depth is 0.7~~0.9, although the very easy crack
sleeve is may do, but it designs the size is unreasonable,
definitely can crack. Can give you to bring in the production troubles
me to want to ask whether the blueprint has been revised?
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
According to your drawings, now pin shaft is stainless steel, carbon steel sleeve is. Sleeve is in question, both ends of the wall thickness is too thin, only 1.23 MM, and carburizing layer depth is 0.7 ~ 0.9, it is easy to crack socket although is can do, but it's not the size of the reasonable design, will certainly craze. Will give you trouble in the production, I want to ask drawings is......
对了要给我分哦~~~
对了要给我分哦~~~
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询