求大神翻译成英语,水平为四级左右就行 首先,对于美国禁枪一事原因,毫无疑问是由于到目前在美国时常发
求大神翻译成英语,水平为四级左右就行首先,对于美国禁枪一事原因,毫无疑问是由于到目前在美国时常发生枪杀案件,因此人们认识到这时候有必要禁枪来遏止这类事情的发生。那么,不得...
求大神翻译成英语,水平为四级左右就行
首先,对于美国禁枪一事原因,毫无疑问是由于到目前在美国时常发生枪杀案件,因此人们认识到这时候有必要禁枪来遏止这类事情的发生。那么,不得不提一个问题,猎人的疯狂捕猎造成了某一物种的灭绝是枪的错?显然不是。枪做什么关键取决于扣动扳机的人,所以禁枪只是一个治标不治本的方法。
诚然与中国相比,中国在几十年前就已经完全禁止了枪,造就了现在相对良好的治安状况。但是,这并不是要让美国违背宪法学习中国完全禁枪的理由。就好比中国共产党不会让其他政党当权,每个国家有自己本国的国情。
我记得奥巴马很早就提到过禁枪,可是到现在美国还是没有禁枪,还会在电视上看到美国又发生校园枪击案。其实这就关系到不同人群的不同利益,并不是全美国人都同意禁枪,肯定有一部人因为利益关系不同意,不然禁枪早就实现了。打一个不恰当的例子,盗版在中国应该是很普遍的。现在开始打击盗版全面支持正版,这意味着我们用office要付版权费,或者我们听一首歌也要付版权费才能听,我想说大家同意吗?我们已经习惯了盗版,习惯了免费,因此现在完全禁止盗版我想在做大部分人不会同意。这就是近年说打击盗版但却一直未见成效的原因,其中关系到不同人群的利益关系。
使用枪支是美国宪法白纸黑字的写的,这是美国的国情,我想一味的禁枪不是根本的方法,或者美国应该重视的是如何教育人们使用枪支,如何完善有关枪支使用的法律。 展开
首先,对于美国禁枪一事原因,毫无疑问是由于到目前在美国时常发生枪杀案件,因此人们认识到这时候有必要禁枪来遏止这类事情的发生。那么,不得不提一个问题,猎人的疯狂捕猎造成了某一物种的灭绝是枪的错?显然不是。枪做什么关键取决于扣动扳机的人,所以禁枪只是一个治标不治本的方法。
诚然与中国相比,中国在几十年前就已经完全禁止了枪,造就了现在相对良好的治安状况。但是,这并不是要让美国违背宪法学习中国完全禁枪的理由。就好比中国共产党不会让其他政党当权,每个国家有自己本国的国情。
我记得奥巴马很早就提到过禁枪,可是到现在美国还是没有禁枪,还会在电视上看到美国又发生校园枪击案。其实这就关系到不同人群的不同利益,并不是全美国人都同意禁枪,肯定有一部人因为利益关系不同意,不然禁枪早就实现了。打一个不恰当的例子,盗版在中国应该是很普遍的。现在开始打击盗版全面支持正版,这意味着我们用office要付版权费,或者我们听一首歌也要付版权费才能听,我想说大家同意吗?我们已经习惯了盗版,习惯了免费,因此现在完全禁止盗版我想在做大部分人不会同意。这就是近年说打击盗版但却一直未见成效的原因,其中关系到不同人群的利益关系。
使用枪支是美国宪法白纸黑字的写的,这是美国的国情,我想一味的禁枪不是根本的方法,或者美国应该重视的是如何教育人们使用枪支,如何完善有关枪支使用的法律。 展开
2016-03-05
展开全部
First, there is no question about the reason for the ban on guns in the United States, because it is often the case in the United States, so it is recognized that there is a need to ban guns to curb the occurrence of such things. So, had to ask a question, the hunter's wild hunting caused the extinction of a certain species is the gun's fault? Obviously not. What do the key depends on the gun trigger, so the gun is only a temporary solution.
It is true that China has completely banned the gun from a few decades ago, and has made relatively good public order. However, this is not to let the United States violate the constitution China completely ban guns for learning. Like the Chinese Communist Party will not let the other party in power, each country has its own national conditions.
I remember Obama had mentioned the gun ban, but now the United States did not ban guns, will see the United States shooting on tv. In fact, this is related to the different interests of different groups, and not all Americans agree to ban guns, must have a person because of interest does not agree, otherwise the gun would have realized. Make an example of inappropriate piracy in Chinese should be very common. Now the fight against piracy fully support genuine, which means that we use office to pay royalties, or we listen to a song to pay royalties to listen to, I want to say you agree? We have been accustomed to piracy, accustomed to free, so now I want to completely ban piracy in the majority of people do not agree. It is said in the fight against piracy but has no effect, which is related to the interests of different groups.
The use of firearms is written by the constitution of the United States in black and white, which is the condition of the United States, I think a taste of the ban on gun is not a fundamental method, or the United States should pay attention to is how to educate people use guns, how to improve the use of firearms related laws.
It is true that China has completely banned the gun from a few decades ago, and has made relatively good public order. However, this is not to let the United States violate the constitution China completely ban guns for learning. Like the Chinese Communist Party will not let the other party in power, each country has its own national conditions.
I remember Obama had mentioned the gun ban, but now the United States did not ban guns, will see the United States shooting on tv. In fact, this is related to the different interests of different groups, and not all Americans agree to ban guns, must have a person because of interest does not agree, otherwise the gun would have realized. Make an example of inappropriate piracy in Chinese should be very common. Now the fight against piracy fully support genuine, which means that we use office to pay royalties, or we listen to a song to pay royalties to listen to, I want to say you agree? We have been accustomed to piracy, accustomed to free, so now I want to completely ban piracy in the majority of people do not agree. It is said in the fight against piracy but has no effect, which is related to the interests of different groups.
The use of firearms is written by the constitution of the United States in black and white, which is the condition of the United States, I think a taste of the ban on gun is not a fundamental method, or the United States should pay attention to is how to educate people use guns, how to improve the use of firearms related laws.
本回答被提问者和网友采纳
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
First, for the reason of US gun-free, there is no doubt that are the cases have been happened in America at present. So people realize that is necessary to carry out the gun-free to prevent. But there is a question, is it the hunter's fault that they hunt continuously and result to the species extinction?Obviously not, gun's usage depends on people who hold the gun. So gun-free is not a revolution to solve the fundamental problem.
Compare to China, China already stop the gun-used dozens years ago. That's why it has a comparatively safe environment. However, This is not the reason of requiring America to learn from China and go against their constitution . Just as Chinese Communist Party won't let other parties hold the rights, every contry has its own national situations.
I remember Obama mentioned to the gun-free long time ago, But until now, it is not carried out. There are still some shooting accidents happen in America's campus. Actually, it concerns the interests of different people, not all Americans agree with the gun-free policy, or this already is put into effect. For an unproper example, piracy can be widely seen in China, But Now legal copy is being supported, this means we have to pay for the copyright when using office software and even listening a song. Will people agree with that?We have already accustomed to pirate copy and free things, if now there is a decision that we have to stop using it, i think most people will oppose. This is the reason why the action to combat piracy have been not sucessful, it concerns the benifits of different people.
Gun can be used is America's constitution,its national situation, i think just forbid people to use gun is not the most suitable way. Maybe America need to focus on how to educate people to use Gun and how to improve the law of using gun.
Compare to China, China already stop the gun-used dozens years ago. That's why it has a comparatively safe environment. However, This is not the reason of requiring America to learn from China and go against their constitution . Just as Chinese Communist Party won't let other parties hold the rights, every contry has its own national situations.
I remember Obama mentioned to the gun-free long time ago, But until now, it is not carried out. There are still some shooting accidents happen in America's campus. Actually, it concerns the interests of different people, not all Americans agree with the gun-free policy, or this already is put into effect. For an unproper example, piracy can be widely seen in China, But Now legal copy is being supported, this means we have to pay for the copyright when using office software and even listening a song. Will people agree with that?We have already accustomed to pirate copy and free things, if now there is a decision that we have to stop using it, i think most people will oppose. This is the reason why the action to combat piracy have been not sucessful, it concerns the benifits of different people.
Gun can be used is America's constitution,its national situation, i think just forbid people to use gun is not the most suitable way. Maybe America need to focus on how to educate people to use Gun and how to improve the law of using gun.
更多追问追答
追问
不好意思,我这里还有一篇,愿意翻译不?
追答
我看看
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询