![](https://iknow-base.cdn.bcebos.com/lxb/notice.png)
英文阅读求翻译(高考难度)
求翻译,机器翻的不要。文章长了点,如果嫌麻烦不一定每个词都要译出来,但每句话的意思基本要准确,当然,如果能翻得详细那就更好了,呵呵,翻得好再加分~~在此谢过各位英语达人~...
求翻译,机器翻的不要。文章长了点,如果嫌麻烦不一定每个词都要译出来,但每句话的意思基本要准确,当然,如果能翻得详细那就更好了,呵呵,翻得好再加分~~在此谢过各位英语达人~~谢谢谢谢谢谢~~
In business, there is a speed difference: It's the difference between how important a firm's leaders say speed is to their competitive strategy and how fast the company actually moves. The difference is important regardless of industry and company size. Companies fearful of losing their competitive advantage spend much time and money looking for ways to pick up the speed.
In our study of 343 businesses, the companies that chose to go, go, go to try to gain an edge ended up with lower sales and operating incomes than those that paused at key moments to make sure they were on the right track. What's more, the firms that "slowed down to speed up "improved their top and bottom lines, averaging 40% higher sales and 52% higher operating incomes over a three-year period.
How did they disobey the laws of business , taking more time than competitors yet performing better? They thought differently about what "slower" and "faster" mean. Firms sometimes fail to understand the difference between operational speed (moving quickly) and strategic speed (reducing the time it takes to deliver value). Simply increasing the speed of production, for example, may be one way to try to reduce the speed difference. But that often leads to reduced value over time, in the form of lower-quality products and services.
In our study, higher-performing companies with strategic speed always made changes when necessary. They became more open to ideas and discussion. They encouraged new ways of thinking. And they allowed time to look back and learn. By contrast , performance suffered at firms that moved fast all the time, paid too much attention to improve efficiency, stuck to tested methods, didn't develop team spirit among their employees, and had little time thinking about changes.
Strategic speed serves as a kind of leadership. Teams that regularly take time to get things right, rather than plough ahead full bore, are more successful in meeting their business goals. That kind of strategy must come from the top. 展开
In business, there is a speed difference: It's the difference between how important a firm's leaders say speed is to their competitive strategy and how fast the company actually moves. The difference is important regardless of industry and company size. Companies fearful of losing their competitive advantage spend much time and money looking for ways to pick up the speed.
In our study of 343 businesses, the companies that chose to go, go, go to try to gain an edge ended up with lower sales and operating incomes than those that paused at key moments to make sure they were on the right track. What's more, the firms that "slowed down to speed up "improved their top and bottom lines, averaging 40% higher sales and 52% higher operating incomes over a three-year period.
How did they disobey the laws of business , taking more time than competitors yet performing better? They thought differently about what "slower" and "faster" mean. Firms sometimes fail to understand the difference between operational speed (moving quickly) and strategic speed (reducing the time it takes to deliver value). Simply increasing the speed of production, for example, may be one way to try to reduce the speed difference. But that often leads to reduced value over time, in the form of lower-quality products and services.
In our study, higher-performing companies with strategic speed always made changes when necessary. They became more open to ideas and discussion. They encouraged new ways of thinking. And they allowed time to look back and learn. By contrast , performance suffered at firms that moved fast all the time, paid too much attention to improve efficiency, stuck to tested methods, didn't develop team spirit among their employees, and had little time thinking about changes.
Strategic speed serves as a kind of leadership. Teams that regularly take time to get things right, rather than plough ahead full bore, are more successful in meeting their business goals. That kind of strategy must come from the top. 展开
2个回答
展开全部
企业存在着速度的差异。 企业领导认为速度对他们的竞争策略有多么重要,但该企业实际行动有多快,这两者之间便是速度差。 这种差异是非常重要的,它与行业和公司大小无关。 那些担心失去竞争优势的公司总是花很多时间和金钱来寻找加快速度的方法。
在我们对343家企业的研究中,那些选择不停地去获取优势的企业,其销量和营业收入最终都低于那些在关键时刻停下来以确保他们路线正确的企业。而且,那些“先慢下来再加速”的企业改善了他们的帐本盈亏,平均来讲,在三年期中销量增长40%,营业收入增长52%。
他们如何在没有遵守商业法则、花了比竞争者更多时间的情况下仍取得较好的业绩呢? 他们对“慢”和“快”有不同的认识。 一些公司常常没有理解运营速度(行动快)和战略速度(缩短时间来提升价值)之间的差异。 例如,简单地提升生产速度可能是设法缩小速度差异的一个方法 但是随着时间的推移,这常常导致价值的下降,表现为产品质量和服务的降低。
在我们的研究中,那些战略速度高、业绩好的公司总能在必要的时候作出调整。 他们的想法和讨论更为开放。 他们鼓励新思路, 他们允许对过去进行回顾反思和学习。 相比之下,那些总是快速前进、对于效率的提高不予关注、墨守那些所谓检验过的方法、不在员工中培养团队意识、没有时间去思考变革的公司,他们的业绩则受到重创。
战略速度是一种领导策略, 那些能够经常花时间来理顺事务,而不是全速前进的团队总能更加成功地达到他们的商业目标。这类策略一定是来自于上层。
在我们对343家企业的研究中,那些选择不停地去获取优势的企业,其销量和营业收入最终都低于那些在关键时刻停下来以确保他们路线正确的企业。而且,那些“先慢下来再加速”的企业改善了他们的帐本盈亏,平均来讲,在三年期中销量增长40%,营业收入增长52%。
他们如何在没有遵守商业法则、花了比竞争者更多时间的情况下仍取得较好的业绩呢? 他们对“慢”和“快”有不同的认识。 一些公司常常没有理解运营速度(行动快)和战略速度(缩短时间来提升价值)之间的差异。 例如,简单地提升生产速度可能是设法缩小速度差异的一个方法 但是随着时间的推移,这常常导致价值的下降,表现为产品质量和服务的降低。
在我们的研究中,那些战略速度高、业绩好的公司总能在必要的时候作出调整。 他们的想法和讨论更为开放。 他们鼓励新思路, 他们允许对过去进行回顾反思和学习。 相比之下,那些总是快速前进、对于效率的提高不予关注、墨守那些所谓检验过的方法、不在员工中培养团队意识、没有时间去思考变革的公司,他们的业绩则受到重创。
战略速度是一种领导策略, 那些能够经常花时间来理顺事务,而不是全速前进的团队总能更加成功地达到他们的商业目标。这类策略一定是来自于上层。
本回答被提问者和网友采纳
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
在企业中,有一个速度上的差异,这是多么重要一个公司的领导人说,速度是他们的竞争策略和公司实际移动的速度有多快之间的差异。重要的是,无论行业和公司规模的差异。寻找拿起速度的方法,公司害怕失去自己的竞争优势,花很多时间和金钱。
在我们研究的343家企业,公司选择了走,走,去尝试获得一个较低的销售和营业收入比那些在关键时刻停下来,确保他们在正确的轨道的边缘。更重要的是,“放慢加快”的企业改善其顶部和底部线,平均高出40%的销售和营业收入高出52%,超过三年期。
他们是如何违反法律业务,以更多的时间比竞争对手还表现更好吗?他们认为,关于什么是“慢”和“快”的意思是不同的。公司有时不明白,运行速度(快速移动)和战略的速度减少所花费的时间来创造价值之间的差额。只是增加了生产的速度,例如,可能是一个办法,以尽量减少的速度差异。但是,这往往会导致减少价值随着时间的推移,在低质量的产品和服务的形式。
在我们的研究中,性能更高的公司战略速度的变化,必要时。他们成为更加开放的思想和讨论。他们鼓励新的思维方式。并允许他们回头看和学习时间。相比之下,业绩受到企业快速移动所有的时间,付出了太多的关注,以提高效率,坚持测试方法,没有发展他们的员工之间的团队合作精神,有一点时间的变化,思维。
作为一种领导战略的速度。队,定期花时间把事情做好,而不是提前犁全口径,更成功地满足了他们的业务目标。这种战略必须从上面来。
在我们研究的343家企业,公司选择了走,走,去尝试获得一个较低的销售和营业收入比那些在关键时刻停下来,确保他们在正确的轨道的边缘。更重要的是,“放慢加快”的企业改善其顶部和底部线,平均高出40%的销售和营业收入高出52%,超过三年期。
他们是如何违反法律业务,以更多的时间比竞争对手还表现更好吗?他们认为,关于什么是“慢”和“快”的意思是不同的。公司有时不明白,运行速度(快速移动)和战略的速度减少所花费的时间来创造价值之间的差额。只是增加了生产的速度,例如,可能是一个办法,以尽量减少的速度差异。但是,这往往会导致减少价值随着时间的推移,在低质量的产品和服务的形式。
在我们的研究中,性能更高的公司战略速度的变化,必要时。他们成为更加开放的思想和讨论。他们鼓励新的思维方式。并允许他们回头看和学习时间。相比之下,业绩受到企业快速移动所有的时间,付出了太多的关注,以提高效率,坚持测试方法,没有发展他们的员工之间的团队合作精神,有一点时间的变化,思维。
作为一种领导战略的速度。队,定期花时间把事情做好,而不是提前犁全口径,更成功地满足了他们的业务目标。这种战略必须从上面来。
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询
广告 您可能关注的内容 |