Question

求翻译一段话，涉及专业词汇，请不要机器翻译，通顺就好，翻译好的话肯定会给追加分，非常非常感谢

A better alternative for practical engineering simulations seems
to be to rely on Large Eddy Simulation (LES) or hybrid RANSLES
methods, such as Detached Eddy Simulation (DES). According
to Shur et al. (2005), these methods are better suited for the
simulation of the flow around bluff bodies because they are less
dissipative than RANS, and so do not damp the development of
3D turbulent structures in the wake. For this reason we decided
to carry out simulations of the 3D flow around a circular cylinder
free to vibrate in the transverse direction using the Spalart-
Allmaras DES model, from Spalart (2000), for a Reynolds number
Re D104.

Answer 1

一个更好的选择是实际工程模拟
是依靠大涡模拟（辅导）或混合ransles
方法，如分离涡模拟（德）。按照
书珥等人。（2005），这些方法更适合
钝体绕流仿真是因为它们不
耗散比并存，而不潮湿的发展
三维湍流结构的醒来。因为这个原因，我们决定
进行模拟的三维圆柱体绕流
自由振动的横向方向使用spalart—
加热模型，从spalart（2000），一个雷诺兹数
我们d104。