求助,翻译一下这段英语。谢谢,不要在线的。
Socialistconstitutionsmakeuseofthoseprogressiveelementsofcapitalistdemocracymanifeste...
Socialist constitutions make use of those progressive elements of capitalist democracy manifested in the constitutions, such as equality before the law, people's sovereignty, and universal suffrage, and transform them to serve socialism.
The constitution is inseparable from democracy. It is legalized and institutionalized democracy. Different countries, however, have different democratic systems. The United States Constitution reflects the democratic system of the uprising bourgeoisie after victories over feudal autocracy and colonial rule. The American people all believe their country is a democratic one, but strangely no such word as "democracy" appears in the United States Constitution. It only provides for "a Republican Form of Government."The preamble to the Constitution, however, begins: "We the People of the United States," and states that the people "do ordain and establish this Constitution."
American scholars have different views with respect to the democratic character of the United States Constitution. Using the records of the Treasury Department, the famous historian Charles A. Beard analyzed in detail the economic interests of the fifty-five delegates to the Philadelphia Convention. He concluded that "four groups of personally interests [were] adversely affected under the Articles of Confederation: money, public securities, manufactures, and trade and shipping." According to Beard:
In the ratification of the Constitution, about three-fourths of the adult males failed to vote on the question, having abstained from the elections at which delegates to the state conventions were chosen, either on account of their indifference or their disfranchisement by property qualifications. The Constitution was ratified by a vote of probably not more than one-sixth of the adult males…
Beard thus concluded: "The Constitution was not created by 'the whole people'… but was the work of a consolidated group…"The current Constitution of the People's Republic of China was adopted in 1982. Although labeled a revised constitution, it is actually a newly drafted one. It reflects the new development of socialist democracy. For the first time, the new Constitution provides that the building of a high level of democracy is one of the basic tasks of the state. 展开
The constitution is inseparable from democracy. It is legalized and institutionalized democracy. Different countries, however, have different democratic systems. The United States Constitution reflects the democratic system of the uprising bourgeoisie after victories over feudal autocracy and colonial rule. The American people all believe their country is a democratic one, but strangely no such word as "democracy" appears in the United States Constitution. It only provides for "a Republican Form of Government."The preamble to the Constitution, however, begins: "We the People of the United States," and states that the people "do ordain and establish this Constitution."
American scholars have different views with respect to the democratic character of the United States Constitution. Using the records of the Treasury Department, the famous historian Charles A. Beard analyzed in detail the economic interests of the fifty-five delegates to the Philadelphia Convention. He concluded that "four groups of personally interests [were] adversely affected under the Articles of Confederation: money, public securities, manufactures, and trade and shipping." According to Beard:
In the ratification of the Constitution, about three-fourths of the adult males failed to vote on the question, having abstained from the elections at which delegates to the state conventions were chosen, either on account of their indifference or their disfranchisement by property qualifications. The Constitution was ratified by a vote of probably not more than one-sixth of the adult males…
Beard thus concluded: "The Constitution was not created by 'the whole people'… but was the work of a consolidated group…"The current Constitution of the People's Republic of China was adopted in 1982. Although labeled a revised constitution, it is actually a newly drafted one. It reflects the new development of socialist democracy. For the first time, the new Constitution provides that the building of a high level of democracy is one of the basic tasks of the state. 展开
2个回答
展开全部
社会主义宪法利用这些进步因素,资本主义民主体现在宪法,诸如法律面前人人平等,人民主权,和普选权,并将其转变为社会主义服务。
宪法是分不开的民主。它是合法化和制度化的民主。不同的国家,然而,有不同的民主制度。美国宪法体现了民主制度的起义后,资产阶级战胜封建专制主义和殖民统治。美国人民都相信他们的国家是一个民主,但奇怪的是没有这样的词是“民主”出现在美国宪法。它只提供“共和政府。”宪法的序言,然而,开始:“我们合众国人民,“美国人民”制定和确立这一部宪法。”
美国学者有不同的意见与尊重的民主性质的美国宪法。使用记录的财政部,著名历史学家查尔斯胡子详细分析经济利益的五十五名代表费城会议。他认为,“四组个人利益[是]不利的影响下,邦联条款:货币,证券,制造,贸易和航运。”根据胡子:
在宪法的批准,约四分之三的成年男性没有投票权的问题上,有弃权选举代表的国家公约的选择,无论是对他们的冷漠或剥夺公民权的财产资格。宪法被批准通过投票可能不超过六分之一的成年男性…
胡须,由此得出结论:“宪法并没有产生“全民……不过是工作的一个综合组……”目前中华人民共和国宪法,中国通过了1982。虽然标记修改宪法,它实际上是一个新起草的一。它反映了社会主义民主的新发展。为第一时间,新宪法规定,建设高度民主的基本任务之一的状态。
宪法是分不开的民主。它是合法化和制度化的民主。不同的国家,然而,有不同的民主制度。美国宪法体现了民主制度的起义后,资产阶级战胜封建专制主义和殖民统治。美国人民都相信他们的国家是一个民主,但奇怪的是没有这样的词是“民主”出现在美国宪法。它只提供“共和政府。”宪法的序言,然而,开始:“我们合众国人民,“美国人民”制定和确立这一部宪法。”
美国学者有不同的意见与尊重的民主性质的美国宪法。使用记录的财政部,著名历史学家查尔斯胡子详细分析经济利益的五十五名代表费城会议。他认为,“四组个人利益[是]不利的影响下,邦联条款:货币,证券,制造,贸易和航运。”根据胡子:
在宪法的批准,约四分之三的成年男性没有投票权的问题上,有弃权选举代表的国家公约的选择,无论是对他们的冷漠或剥夺公民权的财产资格。宪法被批准通过投票可能不超过六分之一的成年男性…
胡须,由此得出结论:“宪法并没有产生“全民……不过是工作的一个综合组……”目前中华人民共和国宪法,中国通过了1982。虽然标记修改宪法,它实际上是一个新起草的一。它反映了社会主义民主的新发展。为第一时间,新宪法规定,建设高度民主的基本任务之一的状态。
展开全部
社会主义宪法利用这些进步的元素的资本主义民主的宪法,如法律面前人人平等,人民主权,普选权,并转换它们来服务社会主义。
从民主的宪法是分不开的。它是合法的、制度化的民主。不同的国家,然而,有不同的民主制度。美国宪法反映了资产阶级民主制度的起义在封建专制和胜利后殖民统治。美国人都相信他们的国家是一个民主党人,但奇怪的是没有这样的词是“民主”出现在美国宪法。它只提供了“一个共和政体。“宪法序言,然而,开始:“我们合众国的人民,”和州,人们“会下令设立这个宪法。”
美国学者有不同的视图就民主党字符的美国宪法。使用记录的财政部,著名的历史学家查尔斯·a·比尔德详细分析了经济利益五十五代表费城会议。他的结论是,“四组个人利益[是]负面影响在《邦联条例》:金钱、公共证券、生产、贸易和航运。“根据胡子:
在批准的宪法,大约四分之三的成年男性未能投票问题,有投了弃权票。选举代表国家约定被选中,要么因为他们的冷漠或其剥夺公民权的财产资格。宪法批准的投票可能不会超过六分之一的成年男性…
胡子这样总结:“宪法不是由“整个人’…不过是一个合并集团的工作…“现行宪法的中华人民共和国是一个
从民主的宪法是分不开的。它是合法的、制度化的民主。不同的国家,然而,有不同的民主制度。美国宪法反映了资产阶级民主制度的起义在封建专制和胜利后殖民统治。美国人都相信他们的国家是一个民主党人,但奇怪的是没有这样的词是“民主”出现在美国宪法。它只提供了“一个共和政体。“宪法序言,然而,开始:“我们合众国的人民,”和州,人们“会下令设立这个宪法。”
美国学者有不同的视图就民主党字符的美国宪法。使用记录的财政部,著名的历史学家查尔斯·a·比尔德详细分析了经济利益五十五代表费城会议。他的结论是,“四组个人利益[是]负面影响在《邦联条例》:金钱、公共证券、生产、贸易和航运。“根据胡子:
在批准的宪法,大约四分之三的成年男性未能投票问题,有投了弃权票。选举代表国家约定被选中,要么因为他们的冷漠或其剥夺公民权的财产资格。宪法批准的投票可能不会超过六分之一的成年男性…
胡子这样总结:“宪法不是由“整个人’…不过是一个合并集团的工作…“现行宪法的中华人民共和国是一个
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询