Question

急求英文翻译！！！

And London Mayor Ken Livingstone has jumped into the fray, saying the reason that London is outstripping New York comes down to two words: "Sarbanes and Oxley," the federal legislation passed to clean up after the corporate fraud scandals. All this has got New York asking consultants from McKinsey to study whether U.S. regulations are indeed driving away companies from U.S. markets.
But when it comes to investor security--that is, which market should investors feel safer investing in--research should give Londoners pause.
Parse through the nationalist clamor and rhetorical gases of the London study, and you'll find that it buried the fact that trading costs are lower on the New York Stock Exchange than in London and elsewhere. Also, the London Stock Exchange won an exemption from the stiffer U.S. regulations, to which officials worldwide have attributed safer, more liquid and transparent American markets.
The New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq are still powering ahead. Moreover, an extensive joint study of internal controls at 667 companies by the University of Wisconsin-Madison, the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Iowa and the MIT-Sloan School of Management found that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act helped lower the cost of equity capital by 50 to 150 basis points.
On top of all this, a new study reveals some surprising attitudes about compliance and e-mail monitoring from financial executives on Wall Street and in London. E-mails were found to be the downfall of executives at Arthur Andersen, Enron, WorldCom and Boeing (nyse: BA - news - people ). The survey simultaneously questioned 300 people working on Wall Street and in London's financial district by Orchestria, a business services company that offers companies advice on compliance with the regulations that govern electronic communications. It revealed that Wall Streeters are more aware than Londoners of compliance breaches and broadly support a company's right to monitor its communications. The research discovered that:
More than 60% of Wall Streeters thought that it was right that their bosses should snoop into their e-mail. By contrast, in London less than half (38%) supported their company's right to monitor e-mail;
Wall Streeters face the heaviest scrutiny. In New York almost three-quarters of respondents who worked in the finance sector thought their e-mail was already monitored (74%), versus 62% of London finance workers.
Bo Manning, chief executive of Orchestria, notes that its survey also "shows there is broad support among employees for regulatory controls in New York." He adds that New Yorkers "recognize that regulations act in the interests of companies, their employees, investors and the markets in which they operate, while reducing the risks of doing business. Moving abroad is not a solution; it does not address the risks that regulation has been introduced to control.
急需上面的翻译，请各位英语好的人帮帮忙！

Answer 1

伦敦市长利文斯通已经跃升成为被卷入旋涡说，正因如此，伦敦是超乎纽约归结为两个词： "萨班斯和奥克斯利法案" ，联邦立法，通过清理后的公司诈骗丑闻。所有这一切，已经有了新的要求，纽约顾问麦肯锡研究是否美国规定确实驱赶公司从美国市场上销售。
但是当涉及到投资者的安全，那就是-市场，其中投资者应感到更安全的投资-研究应给予伦敦稍停。
占得先机，通过民族主义的鼓噪和修辞气体的伦敦学习，你会发现它埋事实，即交易成本较低的当天，纽约证券交易所，比伦敦和其他地方。此外，伦敦证券交易所赢得免于严厉的美国规定，而世界各地的官员都归功于更安全，更液体和透明的美洲市场。
新的纽约证券交易所和纳斯达克仍然是一往无前。此外，一个广泛的联合研究，对内部控制在667个公司，由美国威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校，德州大学奥斯汀分校，获爱荷华大学和麻省理工学院-斯隆管理学院发现，萨班斯-奥克斯利法案有助降低成本股本，由50至150个基点。
再加上这一切，一项新的研究揭示了一些惊人的态度遵守和电子邮件监控，由财务主管对华尔街和伦敦。电子邮件被认为衰落的高管在安达信，安然，世通和波音公司（纽约证券交易所代码： BA -新闻报道-人） 。调查同时质疑300人的工作对华尔街和伦敦金融区所orchestria ，商务服务公司，为公司提供意见，严格遵守有关规例规管电子通讯。据透露，这堵墙streeters有更深入的认识，比伦敦人的履约违规和广泛支持，该公司的权利，以监察其通讯。研究发现：
百分之六十以上的墙体streeters认为这是正确的，他们的老板应该窥探到自己的电子邮箱。相比之下，在伦敦不到一半（ 38 ％ ） ，表示支持他们的公司有权监视电子邮件;
墙streeters面对沉重的审议。在纽约，几乎四分之三的受访者认为工作，在财政部门认为自己的电子邮箱已监测（ 74 ％ ） ，而62 ％的伦敦金融工作者。
公报曼宁，行政长官的orchestria指出，其调查也" ，说明有广泛的支持，其中雇员为规管在纽约" 。他补充说，新的纽约人"认识到，法规的行为，在利益的公司，其员工，投资者和市场的来信，他们在运作，同时减少风险的经商之道。移居国外，是不是一个解决方法，它不是解决风险调控已实行管制。

Answer 2

方法改革和会更好共和国海关反反复复今天的第一家