Question

英文翻译 谁来帮帮忙？

Potential Solutions:
As previously mentioned, discussions on membership expansion have been happening for a while to no avail. There seems to be consensus that reform is necessary to improve the Council, but there has been no agreement on how to go about it. There are few ideas that have yet to be brought up. The most contested issue is increasing permanent membership, so it might be more productive if delegates pay equal attention to plans for increasing non-permanent seats. Along those lines is the question of the veto. Once again, this has been debated for years with no results. Because no permanent member is going to be willing to renounce their power, too much discussion of it will result in a stalemate in committee. Since ridding the Council of veto power is essentially out of the question, it will be best for delegates to focus on enlarging membership to make the body more representative of places where the effects of the resolutions will be felt. It could be useful to touch on ideas for extending the veto to other nations, which might be the only possible middle ground.
As far as working practices, there is only one way to increase efficiency when it comes to interpreting the Charter -- amending the text. While the power that the Security Council is given by the Charter cannot be changed, it might be possible to discuss edits in which determining appropriate measures for dealing with an issue does not depend on interpretation of chapters but on the judgment of the body. This way, the Council would be able to respond in a much timelier manner. The transparency of the Security Council should also be dealt with because this will allow wider participation, even among non-members of the body, increasing its fairness overall. Delegates are encouraged to discuss how to increase access to information on the proceedings for non-members. Also, the Council’s interactions with nations affected by the topic at hand should be increased to facilitate cooperation. These could include open briefings on discussions held and debates open to all, as well as frequent consultations with parties affected by or involved in the topic. These consultations could include measures such as specifically inviting nations to the meetings, allotting them a specific time during the meeting to voice their opinions or concerns, and allowing them to submit draft resolutions that will then be voted on, even if they themselves are not allowed a vote because of their non-member status. To increase efficiency in urgent situations, delegates should consider revising the rules saying the agenda needs to be set well in advance of a meeting so that problems can be dealt with as they arise rather than well after.
那些在线翻译的，可以一边玩去了...

Answer 1

可能的解决方案：
如前所述，讨论扩大成员已发生了而没有用。似乎有共识，改革是必要的改善，但一直没有协议就如何去做。有几个还没有长大。最有争议的问题是增加常任理事国，因此它可能是更有效如果代表并重计划增加非常任理事国席位。沿着这些线路的问题是否决权。再次，这已辩论多年没有结果。因为没有永久成员会愿意放弃他们的权力，太多的讨论，这将导致在相持中委员会。由于消除了理事会否决权本质上是出了问题，这将是最好的代表着重扩大会员使身体更代表地方的影响的决议将感到。它可能是有用的联系思想扩大否决权，其他国家，这可能是唯一可能的中间地带。
至于工作的做法，这是唯一的办法提高效率在解释宪章——修改文本。同时，安全理事会是由宪章是不能改变的，它可能是可能的讨论修改，确定适当的措施解决问题不在于解释章的判断身体。这样，安理会将能够作出更及时的方式。透明度，安理会还应处理，因为这将允许更广泛地参与，即使在非成员的身体，增加其公平全面。代表们鼓励讨论如何增加获得信息的程序对非成员。此外，安理会的相互作用与影响的国家的主题方面应该增加，促进合作。这些可能包括开放的讨论和辩论的报告，向所有人开放，以及频繁的磋商，各方的影响或参与的课题。这些协商等措施可以包括特别邀请联合国会议，分配一个特定的时间在会议上表达他们的意见或问题，并允许他们提交决议草案，然后将投票，即使他们自己不被允许投票因其非会员状态。提高效率，在紧急情况下，代表应考虑修改的规则说议程需要设定以及提前会使问题是可以处理他们的出现而不是好后

Answer 2

可能的解决方案:
正如前面提到的,讨论扩员已经发生一会儿无济于事。似乎有共识,改革是必要的改善委员会,但没有达成如何着手。有一些想法,还没有被提出来。最有争议的问题是增加常任理事国,因此它可能更富有成效的如果代表并重计划增加非常任理事国席位。类似的问题就是否决。再次,这个问题已经争论了很多年没有结果。因为没有永久的成员将会愿意放弃他们的权力,太多的讨论,它将导致一个僵局委员会。因为除掉了委员会的否决权本质上是不可能的,这将是最好的代表们专注于扩大会员要使身体更有代表性的地方的决议的影响都将感受到。它可能是有用的触摸的构思上扩展到其他国家的否决,这可能是唯一可能的中间立场。
至于工作实践,只有一种方法能提高效率谈到口译宪章——修改文本。而电力,安理会是给定的宪章是不能改变的,它有可能讨论的编辑决定适当的措施来处理一个问题并不取决于解释的章节,但在身体的判断。这样,该委员会将能够在一个更更及时的方式回应。安理会的透明度也应该处理,因为这将允许更广泛的参与,甚至在身体的非成员国,增加其公平整体。代表们被鼓励讨论如何增加获得信息非会员为诉讼。同时,安理会的交互影响的国家应该增加主题,促进合作。这些咨询