Question

加急！专业英语翻译，在线等！！

人工灯检与机器灯检比较研究
摘要：目的 按照《中国药典》2010版和GMP的要求，研究人工灯检与机器灯检在实际操作中的可行性。方法 通过两种方法的实际操作情况比较可行性。结果 机器灯检与人工灯检速相比检测速度更高，但容易出现破瓶，误检。结论 人工灯检的可行性比机器灯检更高，机器灯检要求较高，机器灯检不能完全代替人工灯检。
关键词： 人工灯检 机器灯检
摘要：目的 按照《中国药典》2010版和GMP对注射液澄明度的相关要求，研究人工灯检与机器灯检在实际操作中的优越性。方法 通过两种方法的实际操作情况比较两种方法优缺点。结果 机器灯检与人工灯检相比检测速度更快，但容易出现破瓶，误检等问题。结论 人工灯检在实际操作中具有成本低，误检率低等特点。机器灯检效率快，但要求较高，干扰因素也较多，但其灯检后的合格品可以保证没有问题的，但其挑出的不合格品还需要进行人工灯检以保证。

翻译这个，上面的不是

Answer 1

Comparative Study on manul and mechanical lamp inspection.

Abstract:

Purpose

Study on the advantage and disadvantage of manul and mechanical lamp inspection, according to(relating to) the regulation(requirement) in Chinese Pharmacopeia (2010) and GMP on Clarity of Injection

注：写论文的话，书名要斜体，版本卸载括号里即可，最好有个脚注或尾注详细说明此书。第二次引用次数则不再需要脚注或尾注，但版本还是要注明。
另外，根据后文，你是有优势也有劣势，所以我用了advantage and disadvantage，而优越性superiority是单方的，而且不必专门的用这种抽象性的词，用实在的词比较好。

Method

Comparing the merits and defects through actual(experiment) operation result.

Result:

Mechanical lamp inspection is comparativly fast, but there are problems of lamp broken, false positive( false negative), etc.

注：我看了下后文，这里的误检是把好的检查成坏的，所以false negative比较合理。下同

Conclusion:

Manul lamp inspection has the advantage of low cost, and high accuracy(low false postive/ false negative) , etc. Mechanical lamp inspection is more efficient, but it has higher requirement, and more interference factors. The qualified production results is reliable, but negative(false/denied) product results require further manual inspection.

注：有问题请追问。

Answer 2

Purpose
Study the superiority between the artificial lamp inspection and mechanical lamp inspection, according to the requirement of injection clarity in Chinese Pharmacopoeia edition 2010 and demand of GMP.
Method
Compared the advantages and disadvantages by these actual operation.
Result
Inspected rate of mechanical lamp inspection higher than artificial lamp inspection, though more damaged bottle and error detection.
Conclusion
In the actual practice artificial lamp inspection has advantages of low cost and low error detection, while mechanical lamp inspection more effective but more requirements and more interference factors. We can ensure the qualified detection by mechanical lamp inspection are definitely fine, but the unqualified products need artificial light inspection for futher ensure.

希望对你有帮助。

Answer 3

加油，辛苦啊
Abstract: objective in accordance with the " Chinese Pharmacopoeia " 2010 edition and GMP on clarity of injection related requirements, research on artificial lamp inspection lamp inspection and machine in the actual operation of the superiority of. Methods through two methods of actual operating conditions of two kinds of methods to compare the advantages and disadvantages of. The results of machine lamp inspection lamp inspection compared with artificial detection speed, but easily broken bottles, error detection problem. Conclusion artificial light inspection in actual operation has the advantages of low cost, low error rate. Machine light inspection efficiency, but higher, interference factors are more, but the light inspection after the qualified product can ensure that there is no problem, but its singled out the unqualified products also need for artificial light inspection to ensure.