Question

请高手帮忙翻译一段话，谢谢啦！！

1803年着名的马伯里诉麦迪逊案之后，美国联邦法院系统拥有了违宪审查权。这意味着联邦各级法院可以审查立法机关通过的法律是否与宪法相抵触，并且可以宣布违反宪法的法律无效。同时，法院还可以审查包括美国总统在内的各级政府颁布的法令的合宪性。但是，法院的这种审查权不能主动行使，只能在某一具体诉讼中被运用。因此，这也被称作“被动的审查权”

Answer 1

after in 1803 renowned Marbury sued the Madison document, the American Federation court structure had the violation of the constitution examination power. This means federal all levels of courts may examine the Legislature through whether the law to conflict with the constitution, and may announce that violates the constitution the law to be invalid. At the same time, the court may also examine including the American president's All levels of the government promulgation law gathers the constitution. But, the court this kind of examination power cannot exercise on own initiative, can only utilize in some concrete lawsuit. Therefore, this is also called as “the passive examination power”

Answer 2

1803 famous Mamoli v. Madison case, the United States federal court system has the right to review the Constitution. This means that the federal courts at all levels can be passed by the legislature to review the law inconsistent with the Constitution, may be declared in violation of the Constitution and the law null and void. At the same time, the court could also be reviewed, including the United States president, at all levels of government promulgated the constitutionality of the Act. However, the Court of the right to such a review can not take the initiative to exercise only in a specific proceedings were used. Therefore, it is also known as "passive right to review"