英语阅读中句子翻译理解，为何我总无法串成一句话？
Whenthepublicmoodchanges,therealizationcantaketimetosinkin.Behaviorthatwasonceaccepta...
When the public mood changes, the realization can take time to sink in. Behavior that was once acceptable can overnight come to be seen as outrageous. The board of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), a big pharmaceutical company, has found itself at the sharp end of such a mood change. Its shareholders voted to reject the company's remuneration committee report, which would have paid Jean-Pierre Gamier, its Chief Executive, $35m if he lost his job and treated him and his wife as three years older than they actually are for the purpose of increasing their pensions.
The vote is purely advisory, with no binding force. But it leaves the company in a sort of legal limbo. More importantly, it leaves boardrooms everywhere in a difficult position. The message of shareholder discontent with large executive pay packages and poor corporate performance has never been so clear.
Company bosses have been slow to understand the new mood of outrage among shareholders. Shareholders have for years accepted that 'fat cat' bosses paid themselves more or less whatever they liked. So it is uncomfortable to face criticism. But behind the criticism is a strong feeling that many chief executives are living according to quite a different set of rules from everyone else.
Although the value of most large companies has fallen considerably over the last few years, bosses have continued to pay themselves more.
1.Why is the company now in a difficult position?
2.What annoyed the shareholders most about Garnier’s pay package?
3.Why are badly performing executives sometimes paid large sums?
4.How will a change in public mood affect future chief executives?
5.How have company bosses continued to survive differently from everyone else? 展开
The vote is purely advisory, with no binding force. But it leaves the company in a sort of legal limbo. More importantly, it leaves boardrooms everywhere in a difficult position. The message of shareholder discontent with large executive pay packages and poor corporate performance has never been so clear.
Company bosses have been slow to understand the new mood of outrage among shareholders. Shareholders have for years accepted that 'fat cat' bosses paid themselves more or less whatever they liked. So it is uncomfortable to face criticism. But behind the criticism is a strong feeling that many chief executives are living according to quite a different set of rules from everyone else.
Although the value of most large companies has fallen considerably over the last few years, bosses have continued to pay themselves more.
1.Why is the company now in a difficult position?
2.What annoyed the shareholders most about Garnier’s pay package?
3.Why are badly performing executives sometimes paid large sums?
4.How will a change in public mood affect future chief executives?
5.How have company bosses continued to survive differently from everyone else? 展开
- 你的回答被采纳后将获得：
- 系统奖励15（财富值+成长值）+难题奖励30（财富值+成长值）
2个回答
展开全部
看的是英语，但是翻译成汉语，得按照中国人的思维去组合词语和句子，才能成为中国人能理解的句子
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
展开全部
哪句话你不懂，不会。 请指出。
更多追问追答
追问
Its shareholders voted to reject the company's re …… lost his job and treated him and his wife as three years older than they actually are for the purpose of increasing their pensions.
Its shareholders voted to reject the company's re …… lost his job and treated him and his wife as three years older than they actually are for the purpose of increasing their pensions.
本回答被提问者采纳
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
推荐律师服务：
若未解决您的问题，请您详细描述您的问题，通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询
