请英语高手帮我翻译成英文,急用
关于这次审核,我想做下解释:工厂收到通知,有一批货要马上发掉,而且工厂的成品仓库已经满了,所以他们把这批货暂时堆放在了成品仓库门口方便装车。公司规定所有的成品要储放在一个...
关于这次审核,我想做下解释:
工厂收到通知,有一批货要马上发掉,而且工厂的成品仓库已经满了,所以他们把这批货暂时堆放在了成品仓库门口方便装车。公司规定所有的成品要储放在一个被管控的区域,很显然仓库门口无法被良好地管控,这样成品就有了被盗窃、被损坏的危险。
工厂以为短时间内堆放在门口没有关系,事实上这样做是不被允许的,我加深对工厂的培训,告知他们这是一个严重的问题,来提高他们保护成品的意识。
2.
来验厂之前,我已经多次告知工厂让他们把原材料放在原材料仓库里,事实上他们已经把大部份原材料放在了仓库里,但是在验厂前两天,他们又进了一批塑料粒子,他们觉得塑料粒子不用担心受潮,并且仓库已经满了,所以工人把它们放在了过道里。
我觉得我对工厂的培训还不够好,物料放在外面,很有可能被盗窃,丢失,即使塑料粒子不会受潮,但多少会影响产品的品质,工厂在这方面的意识显然还不够,他们存在侥幸心理。我会再次对工厂管理员进行培训,来杜绝这种情况再次发生。
我曾经把这份程序文件发给工厂,但是他们忘了把它打印出来,我工作失误的地方是,我没有复查一遍,为此我感到很抱歉。
我会催促工厂把这份文件打印出来,并确保文件盖上了【受控文件】图章。
:之前在检查这份文件时,我发现这份文件规定的存档期有问题,所以我让工厂重新修改,但是他们的文员为了省力只是手动涂改了数字,这是不被允许的,程序文件必须打印出来不得手写,所以the auditor认为这份文件时无效的。
我很抱歉,没有对这份文件进行复检,这是一个非常不应该的失误,我会让他们重新修改并打印这份程序文件,并复查一遍确保无误。
有些问题,as weekly quality goals and actual performance,培训计划,检验记录,产前会议等,有一些只是有一部分不符合要求,或缺少了一份培训记录,那么它们涉及的整个环节都会被认为无效的,我觉得这对工厂有点不太公平。
另外,the Auditor告诉我们,上海TCPS收到一个举报,说工厂未经审核在做儿童产品,所以他必须对工厂进行严格审查。
我问过工厂,它们很肯定得答复我,它们以前没有做过儿童产品,将来也不会,而且我在现场也没有看到有做过儿童产品的痕迹。为此,我们丢失了很多分数。 展开
工厂收到通知,有一批货要马上发掉,而且工厂的成品仓库已经满了,所以他们把这批货暂时堆放在了成品仓库门口方便装车。公司规定所有的成品要储放在一个被管控的区域,很显然仓库门口无法被良好地管控,这样成品就有了被盗窃、被损坏的危险。
工厂以为短时间内堆放在门口没有关系,事实上这样做是不被允许的,我加深对工厂的培训,告知他们这是一个严重的问题,来提高他们保护成品的意识。
2.
来验厂之前,我已经多次告知工厂让他们把原材料放在原材料仓库里,事实上他们已经把大部份原材料放在了仓库里,但是在验厂前两天,他们又进了一批塑料粒子,他们觉得塑料粒子不用担心受潮,并且仓库已经满了,所以工人把它们放在了过道里。
我觉得我对工厂的培训还不够好,物料放在外面,很有可能被盗窃,丢失,即使塑料粒子不会受潮,但多少会影响产品的品质,工厂在这方面的意识显然还不够,他们存在侥幸心理。我会再次对工厂管理员进行培训,来杜绝这种情况再次发生。
我曾经把这份程序文件发给工厂,但是他们忘了把它打印出来,我工作失误的地方是,我没有复查一遍,为此我感到很抱歉。
我会催促工厂把这份文件打印出来,并确保文件盖上了【受控文件】图章。
:之前在检查这份文件时,我发现这份文件规定的存档期有问题,所以我让工厂重新修改,但是他们的文员为了省力只是手动涂改了数字,这是不被允许的,程序文件必须打印出来不得手写,所以the auditor认为这份文件时无效的。
我很抱歉,没有对这份文件进行复检,这是一个非常不应该的失误,我会让他们重新修改并打印这份程序文件,并复查一遍确保无误。
有些问题,as weekly quality goals and actual performance,培训计划,检验记录,产前会议等,有一些只是有一部分不符合要求,或缺少了一份培训记录,那么它们涉及的整个环节都会被认为无效的,我觉得这对工厂有点不太公平。
另外,the Auditor告诉我们,上海TCPS收到一个举报,说工厂未经审核在做儿童产品,所以他必须对工厂进行严格审查。
我问过工厂,它们很肯定得答复我,它们以前没有做过儿童产品,将来也不会,而且我在现场也没有看到有做过儿童产品的痕迹。为此,我们丢失了很多分数。 展开
7个回答
展开全部
关于这次审核,我想做下解释:
1. 工厂收到通知,有一批货要马上发掉,而且工厂的成品仓库已经满了,所以他们把这批货暂时堆放在了成品仓库门口方便装车。公司规定所有的成品要储放在一个被管控的区域,很显然仓库门口无法被良好地管控,这样成品就有了被盗窃、被损坏的危险。
工厂以为短时间内堆放在门口没有关系,事实上这样做是不被允许的,我加深对工厂的培训,告知他们这是一个严重的问题,来提高他们保护成品的意识。
I want to makesome clarifications regarding this audit:
1. The plant was informed that a batch of goods would be dispatched immediately; as the
finished good warehouse was already full, so they placed this batch of goods at the
entrance of the warehouse for easy loading to the truck. The company specifies that all
finished products must be stored in a controlled area; obviously, the warehouse entrance is
unable to be controlled properly, there is a risk for the finished products to be stolen or
damaged.
2. 来验厂之前,我已经多次告知工厂让他们把原材料放在原材料仓库里,事实上他们已经把大部份原材料放在了仓库里,但是在验厂前两天,他们又进了一批塑料粒子,他们觉得塑料粒子不用担心受潮,并且仓库已经满了,所以工人把它们放在了过道里。
我觉得我对工厂的培训还不够好,物料放在外面,很有可能被盗窃,丢失,即使塑料粒子不会受潮,但多少会影响产品的品质,工厂在这方面的意识显然还不够,他们存在侥幸心理。我会再次对工厂管理员进行培训,来杜绝这种情况再次发生。
我曾经把这份程序文件发给工厂,但是他们忘了把它打印出来,我工作失误的地方是,我没有复查一遍,为此我感到很抱歉。我会催促工厂把这份文件打印出来,并确保文件盖上了【受控文件】图章。
2. Before the plant inspection,I had time and again told the plant to stock the raw materials in raw material warehouse; as a matter of fact, most of the raw materials were in the warehouse. But two days before the inspection, they bought in a batch of plastic granules; they thought
that plastic granules would not be affected by moisture, besides, the warehouse had been full, so they were placed in the aisle.
I concluded that my training is not good enough; materials put in the open can possibly be
stolen or lost, even if the plastic granules could not be spoiled by dampness, somehow the quality would be affected. The awareness in this aspect is apparently not enough and they have wishful thinking. I shall conduct training again for the plant administrators so as to prevent this kind of situation from happening again.
I had sent this procedure document to the plant before, but they forgot to print it out; it was my mistake for not checking over again, I am very sorry for this. I will prompt them to print out the document and ensure that the seal of “controlled file” is stamped.
:之前在检查这份文件时,我发现这份文件规定的存档期有问题,所以我让工厂重新修改,但是他们的文员为了省力只是手动涂改了数字,这是不被允许的,程序文件必须打印出来不得手写,所以the auditor认为这份文件时无效的。
我很抱歉,没有对这份文件进行复检,这是一个非常不应该的失误,我会让他们重新修改并打印这份程序文件,并复查一遍确保无误。
有些问题,as weekly quality goals and actual performance,培训计划,检验记录,产前会议等,有一些只是有一部分不符合要求,或缺少了一份培训记录,那么它们涉及的整个环节都会被认为无效的,我觉得这对工厂有点不太公平。
另外,the Auditor告诉我们,上海TCPS收到一个举报,说工厂未经审核在做儿童产品,所以他必须对工厂进行严格审查。
我问过工厂,它们很肯定得答复我,它们以前没有做过儿童产品,将来也不会,而且我在现场也没有看到有做过儿童产品的痕迹。为此,我们丢失了很多分数。
When I checked this document, I discovered that there is a problem in the filing date and so I
asked the plant to amend it. But the clerk just manually corrected the number. This is not permitted because procedure document must be printed and not hand-written; so the auditor decided that this document is invalid.
I apologize for not conducting recheck on this document; this is a mistake that should not
happen. I shall ensure they correct and print this document and I will recheck it to ensure no mistake.
There are some issues, such as weekly quality goals and actual performance, training plans,
inspection records, pre-production meetings etc., some of them did not meet the requirement only partially or short of a training record, but they were treated as totally invalid; I feel that it is not fair to the plant.
Moreover, the auditor told us that the Shanghai TCPS had received a tip-off that the plant was
producing children products without being audited, so they must impose strict
examination on the plant. I had asked the plant about this matter, they positively replied that they had never produced children products before and never would in future. Besides, I found
no trace of production in children products on site. However, we had lost many points for this.
【英语牛人团】
1. 工厂收到通知,有一批货要马上发掉,而且工厂的成品仓库已经满了,所以他们把这批货暂时堆放在了成品仓库门口方便装车。公司规定所有的成品要储放在一个被管控的区域,很显然仓库门口无法被良好地管控,这样成品就有了被盗窃、被损坏的危险。
工厂以为短时间内堆放在门口没有关系,事实上这样做是不被允许的,我加深对工厂的培训,告知他们这是一个严重的问题,来提高他们保护成品的意识。
I want to makesome clarifications regarding this audit:
1. The plant was informed that a batch of goods would be dispatched immediately; as the
finished good warehouse was already full, so they placed this batch of goods at the
entrance of the warehouse for easy loading to the truck. The company specifies that all
finished products must be stored in a controlled area; obviously, the warehouse entrance is
unable to be controlled properly, there is a risk for the finished products to be stolen or
damaged.
2. 来验厂之前,我已经多次告知工厂让他们把原材料放在原材料仓库里,事实上他们已经把大部份原材料放在了仓库里,但是在验厂前两天,他们又进了一批塑料粒子,他们觉得塑料粒子不用担心受潮,并且仓库已经满了,所以工人把它们放在了过道里。
我觉得我对工厂的培训还不够好,物料放在外面,很有可能被盗窃,丢失,即使塑料粒子不会受潮,但多少会影响产品的品质,工厂在这方面的意识显然还不够,他们存在侥幸心理。我会再次对工厂管理员进行培训,来杜绝这种情况再次发生。
我曾经把这份程序文件发给工厂,但是他们忘了把它打印出来,我工作失误的地方是,我没有复查一遍,为此我感到很抱歉。我会催促工厂把这份文件打印出来,并确保文件盖上了【受控文件】图章。
2. Before the plant inspection,I had time and again told the plant to stock the raw materials in raw material warehouse; as a matter of fact, most of the raw materials were in the warehouse. But two days before the inspection, they bought in a batch of plastic granules; they thought
that plastic granules would not be affected by moisture, besides, the warehouse had been full, so they were placed in the aisle.
I concluded that my training is not good enough; materials put in the open can possibly be
stolen or lost, even if the plastic granules could not be spoiled by dampness, somehow the quality would be affected. The awareness in this aspect is apparently not enough and they have wishful thinking. I shall conduct training again for the plant administrators so as to prevent this kind of situation from happening again.
I had sent this procedure document to the plant before, but they forgot to print it out; it was my mistake for not checking over again, I am very sorry for this. I will prompt them to print out the document and ensure that the seal of “controlled file” is stamped.
:之前在检查这份文件时,我发现这份文件规定的存档期有问题,所以我让工厂重新修改,但是他们的文员为了省力只是手动涂改了数字,这是不被允许的,程序文件必须打印出来不得手写,所以the auditor认为这份文件时无效的。
我很抱歉,没有对这份文件进行复检,这是一个非常不应该的失误,我会让他们重新修改并打印这份程序文件,并复查一遍确保无误。
有些问题,as weekly quality goals and actual performance,培训计划,检验记录,产前会议等,有一些只是有一部分不符合要求,或缺少了一份培训记录,那么它们涉及的整个环节都会被认为无效的,我觉得这对工厂有点不太公平。
另外,the Auditor告诉我们,上海TCPS收到一个举报,说工厂未经审核在做儿童产品,所以他必须对工厂进行严格审查。
我问过工厂,它们很肯定得答复我,它们以前没有做过儿童产品,将来也不会,而且我在现场也没有看到有做过儿童产品的痕迹。为此,我们丢失了很多分数。
When I checked this document, I discovered that there is a problem in the filing date and so I
asked the plant to amend it. But the clerk just manually corrected the number. This is not permitted because procedure document must be printed and not hand-written; so the auditor decided that this document is invalid.
I apologize for not conducting recheck on this document; this is a mistake that should not
happen. I shall ensure they correct and print this document and I will recheck it to ensure no mistake.
There are some issues, such as weekly quality goals and actual performance, training plans,
inspection records, pre-production meetings etc., some of them did not meet the requirement only partially or short of a training record, but they were treated as totally invalid; I feel that it is not fair to the plant.
Moreover, the auditor told us that the Shanghai TCPS had received a tip-off that the plant was
producing children products without being audited, so they must impose strict
examination on the plant. I had asked the plant about this matter, they positively replied that they had never produced children products before and never would in future. Besides, I found
no trace of production in children products on site. However, we had lost many points for this.
【英语牛人团】
展开全部
On the review, I want to explain:
Factory received the notice, a batch of goods to send out, but the factory warehouse is full, so they put the goods temporarily stacked in the warehouse door convenient loading. The company provides all the finished product should be stored in a controlled area, apparently warehouse door cannot be well controlled, such products have been stolen, the danger of being damaged.
The factory that short time stacked in front of it doesn't matter, in fact this is not allowed, I to deepen the training of factory, let them know it is a serious problem, to improve their awareness of protecting the finished product.
2
Prior to inspection of the plant, I have repeatedly told factories let them put materials in raw material warehouse, in fact they have most of the raw material is placed in the warehouse, but in the factory before two days, they go back to a number of plastic particles, they feel plastic particles do not have to worry about damp, and warehouse has full, so the workers put them in the aisle.
I think I on the training of factory is not good enough, the material is put on the outside, is likely to be stolen, lost, even if the plastic particles will not be affected with damp, but how many will affect the quality of products, factories in this consciousness is clearly not enough, they have the lucky psychology. I will once again to the factory manager training, to prevent this from happening again.
I have to have this program files to the factory, but they forget to print it out, I errors in the work place is, I didn't review it again, so I'm sorry.
I would urge the factory to the document is printed out, and make sure the file cover [ ] a controlled document.
Before: check this file, I found the document archive period in question, so I let the factory to modify, but their clerk to save only manual correction of digital, this is not allowed, program files must not hand print out, the the auditor think this file invalid.
I'm sorry, not on the document review, this is a very should not mistake, I will make them to modify and print the program files, and review it again to ensure that the correct.
Some of the problems, as weekly quality goals and actual performance, training plan, inspection records, prenatal meetings, some just have a portion that does not meet the requirements, or the lack of a training record, so they relate to the link will be considered invalid, I think it is not fair to the factory.
In addition, the Auditor told us, Shanghai TCPS received a report, said the factory without examination in children's products, so he must plant strictly review.
I asked the factory, they are sure to reply to me, they have not done children's products, will not be, and I at the scene also did not see doing children's products. To this end, we lost a lot of points.
又不会的,再问哦!
\(^o^)/~
Factory received the notice, a batch of goods to send out, but the factory warehouse is full, so they put the goods temporarily stacked in the warehouse door convenient loading. The company provides all the finished product should be stored in a controlled area, apparently warehouse door cannot be well controlled, such products have been stolen, the danger of being damaged.
The factory that short time stacked in front of it doesn't matter, in fact this is not allowed, I to deepen the training of factory, let them know it is a serious problem, to improve their awareness of protecting the finished product.
2
Prior to inspection of the plant, I have repeatedly told factories let them put materials in raw material warehouse, in fact they have most of the raw material is placed in the warehouse, but in the factory before two days, they go back to a number of plastic particles, they feel plastic particles do not have to worry about damp, and warehouse has full, so the workers put them in the aisle.
I think I on the training of factory is not good enough, the material is put on the outside, is likely to be stolen, lost, even if the plastic particles will not be affected with damp, but how many will affect the quality of products, factories in this consciousness is clearly not enough, they have the lucky psychology. I will once again to the factory manager training, to prevent this from happening again.
I have to have this program files to the factory, but they forget to print it out, I errors in the work place is, I didn't review it again, so I'm sorry.
I would urge the factory to the document is printed out, and make sure the file cover [ ] a controlled document.
Before: check this file, I found the document archive period in question, so I let the factory to modify, but their clerk to save only manual correction of digital, this is not allowed, program files must not hand print out, the the auditor think this file invalid.
I'm sorry, not on the document review, this is a very should not mistake, I will make them to modify and print the program files, and review it again to ensure that the correct.
Some of the problems, as weekly quality goals and actual performance, training plan, inspection records, prenatal meetings, some just have a portion that does not meet the requirements, or the lack of a training record, so they relate to the link will be considered invalid, I think it is not fair to the factory.
In addition, the Auditor told us, Shanghai TCPS received a report, said the factory without examination in children's products, so he must plant strictly review.
I asked the factory, they are sure to reply to me, they have not done children's products, will not be, and I at the scene also did not see doing children's products. To this end, we lost a lot of points.
又不会的,再问哦!
\(^o^)/~
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
太困难了,但不建议采用的一楼!要看到,这台机器翻译,这篇文章是如何的感觉是外国人写的,真的,百度,看看吧!
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
On the audit, I want to explain:
Factory received the notice, a batch of goods to send out, but the factory warehouse is full, so they put the goods temporarily stacked in the warehouse door convenient loading. The company provides all the finished product should be stored in a controlled area, apparently warehouse door cannot be well controlled, such products have been stolen, the danger of being damaged.
The factory that short time stacked in front of it doesn't matter, in fact this is not allowed, I to deepen the training of factory, let them know it is a serious problem, to improve their awareness of protecting the finished product.
Prior to the factory inspection, I have repeatedly told the factory to let them put materials in raw material warehouse, in fact they have most of the raw material in the warehouse, but in the factory for two days before, they scored a number of plastic particles plastic particles don't worry, they feel damp, and warehouse has full, so the workers put them in the aisles. I feel I am the factory training is not good enough, the material on the outside, is likely to be stolen, lost, even if the plastic particles will not be affected with damp, but how many will affect the quality of the products, factories in this consciousness is clearly not enough, they have the lucky psychology. I will plant managers training again, to prevent this from happening again. I have to get this program files to the factory, but they forget to print it out, my mistakes in the work place, I didn't review again, and I feel very sorry. would urge the factory to the document is printed out, and make sure the file cover [ ] a controlled document. Before: check this file, I found the document archive period in question, so I let the factory to modify, but their clerk to save only manual correction of digital, this is not allowed, program files must not hand print out, the the auditor think this file invalid. I'm sorry, not on the document review, this is a very should not mistake, I will make them to modify and print the program files, and review it again to ensure that the correct. Some of the problems, as weekly quality goals and actual performance, training plan, inspection records, prenatal meetings, some just have a portion that does not meet the requirements, or the lack of a training record, so they relate to the link will be considered invalid, I think it is not fair to the factory. In addition, the Auditor told us, Shanghai TCPS received a report, said the factory without examination in children's products, so he must plant strictly review. have asked the factory, they are sure to reply to me, they have not done before the children's products, and will not, and I at the scene also did not see do children's products traces. Therefore, we lost a lot of points.
Factory received the notice, a batch of goods to send out, but the factory warehouse is full, so they put the goods temporarily stacked in the warehouse door convenient loading. The company provides all the finished product should be stored in a controlled area, apparently warehouse door cannot be well controlled, such products have been stolen, the danger of being damaged.
The factory that short time stacked in front of it doesn't matter, in fact this is not allowed, I to deepen the training of factory, let them know it is a serious problem, to improve their awareness of protecting the finished product.
Prior to the factory inspection, I have repeatedly told the factory to let them put materials in raw material warehouse, in fact they have most of the raw material in the warehouse, but in the factory for two days before, they scored a number of plastic particles plastic particles don't worry, they feel damp, and warehouse has full, so the workers put them in the aisles. I feel I am the factory training is not good enough, the material on the outside, is likely to be stolen, lost, even if the plastic particles will not be affected with damp, but how many will affect the quality of the products, factories in this consciousness is clearly not enough, they have the lucky psychology. I will plant managers training again, to prevent this from happening again. I have to get this program files to the factory, but they forget to print it out, my mistakes in the work place, I didn't review again, and I feel very sorry. would urge the factory to the document is printed out, and make sure the file cover [ ] a controlled document. Before: check this file, I found the document archive period in question, so I let the factory to modify, but their clerk to save only manual correction of digital, this is not allowed, program files must not hand print out, the the auditor think this file invalid. I'm sorry, not on the document review, this is a very should not mistake, I will make them to modify and print the program files, and review it again to ensure that the correct. Some of the problems, as weekly quality goals and actual performance, training plan, inspection records, prenatal meetings, some just have a portion that does not meet the requirements, or the lack of a training record, so they relate to the link will be considered invalid, I think it is not fair to the factory. In addition, the Auditor told us, Shanghai TCPS received a report, said the factory without examination in children's products, so he must plant strictly review. have asked the factory, they are sure to reply to me, they have not done before the children's products, and will not, and I at the scene also did not see do children's products traces. Therefore, we lost a lot of points.
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
简单,百度,在线翻译。
On the review, I want to explain:
Factory received the notice, a batch of goods to send out, but the factory warehouse is full, so they put the goods temporarily stacked in the warehouse door convenient loading. The company provides all the finished product should be stored in a controlled area, apparently warehouse door cannot be well controlled, such products have been stolen, the danger of being damaged.
The factory that short time stacked in front of it doesn't matter, in fact this is not allowed, I to deepen the training of factory, let them know it is a serious problem, to improve their awareness of protecting the finished product.
2
Prior to inspection of the plant, I have repeatedly told factories let them put materials in raw material warehouse, in fact they have most of the raw material is placed in the warehouse, but in the factory before two days, they go back to a number of plastic particles, they feel plastic particles do not have to worry about damp, and warehouse has full, so the workers put them in the aisle.
I think I on the training of factory is not good enough, the material is put on the outside, is likely to be stolen, lost, even if the plastic particles will not be affected with damp, but how many will affect the quality of products, factories in this consciousness is clearly not enough, they have the lucky psychology. I will once again to the factory manager training, to prevent this from happening again.
I have to have this program files to the factory, but they forget to print it out, I errors in the work place is, I didn't review it again, so I'm sorry.
I would urge the factory to the document is printed out, and make sure the file cover [ ] a controlled document.
Before: check this file, I found the document archive period in question, so I let the factory to modify, but their clerk to save only manual correction of digital, this is not allowed, program files must not hand print out, the the auditor think this file invalid.
I'm sorry, not on the document review, this is a very should not mistake, I will make them to modify and print the program files, and review it again to ensure that the correct.
Some of the problems, as weekly quality goals and actual performance, training plan, inspection records, prenatal meetings, some just have a portion that does not meet the requirements, or the lack of a training record, so they relate to the link will be considered invalid, I think it is not fair to the factory.
In addition, the Auditor told us, Shanghai TCPS received a report, said the factory without examination in children's products, so he must plant strictly review.
I asked the factory, they are sure to reply to me, they have not done children's products, will not be, and I at the scene also did not see doing children's products. To this end, we lost a lot of points.
On the review, I want to explain:
Factory received the notice, a batch of goods to send out, but the factory warehouse is full, so they put the goods temporarily stacked in the warehouse door convenient loading. The company provides all the finished product should be stored in a controlled area, apparently warehouse door cannot be well controlled, such products have been stolen, the danger of being damaged.
The factory that short time stacked in front of it doesn't matter, in fact this is not allowed, I to deepen the training of factory, let them know it is a serious problem, to improve their awareness of protecting the finished product.
2
Prior to inspection of the plant, I have repeatedly told factories let them put materials in raw material warehouse, in fact they have most of the raw material is placed in the warehouse, but in the factory before two days, they go back to a number of plastic particles, they feel plastic particles do not have to worry about damp, and warehouse has full, so the workers put them in the aisle.
I think I on the training of factory is not good enough, the material is put on the outside, is likely to be stolen, lost, even if the plastic particles will not be affected with damp, but how many will affect the quality of products, factories in this consciousness is clearly not enough, they have the lucky psychology. I will once again to the factory manager training, to prevent this from happening again.
I have to have this program files to the factory, but they forget to print it out, I errors in the work place is, I didn't review it again, so I'm sorry.
I would urge the factory to the document is printed out, and make sure the file cover [ ] a controlled document.
Before: check this file, I found the document archive period in question, so I let the factory to modify, but their clerk to save only manual correction of digital, this is not allowed, program files must not hand print out, the the auditor think this file invalid.
I'm sorry, not on the document review, this is a very should not mistake, I will make them to modify and print the program files, and review it again to ensure that the correct.
Some of the problems, as weekly quality goals and actual performance, training plan, inspection records, prenatal meetings, some just have a portion that does not meet the requirements, or the lack of a training record, so they relate to the link will be considered invalid, I think it is not fair to the factory.
In addition, the Auditor told us, Shanghai TCPS received a report, said the factory without examination in children's products, so he must plant strictly review.
I asked the factory, they are sure to reply to me, they have not done children's products, will not be, and I at the scene also did not see doing children's products. To this end, we lost a lot of points.
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
On the review, I want to explain : the factory received the notice, a batch of goods to send out, but the factory warehouse is full, so they put the goods temporarily stacked in the warehouse door convenient loading. The company provides all the finished product should be stored in a controlled area, apparently warehouse door cannot be well controlled, such products have been stolen, the danger of being damaged. The factory that short time stacked in front of it doesn't matter, in fact this is not allowed, I to deepen the training of factory, let them know it is a serious problem, to improve their awareness of protecting the finished product. 2 to factory inspection before, I have been told many times factory let them put materials in raw material warehouse, in fact they have most of the raw material is placed in the warehouse, but in the factory before two days, they go back to a number of plastic particles plastic particles, they feel without worry of damp, and the warehouse is full, so the workers put them in the aisle. I think I on the training of factory is not good enough, the material is put on the outside, is likely to be stolen, lost, even if the plastic particles will not be affected with damp, but how many will affect the quality of products, factories in this consciousness is clearly not enough, they have the lucky psychology. I will once again to the factory manager training, to prevent this from happening again. I have to have this program files to the factory, but they forget to print it out, I errors in the work place is, I didn't review it again, so I'm sorry. I would urge the factory to the document is printed out, and make sure the file cover [ ] a controlled document. Before: check this file, I found the document archive period in question, so I let the factory to modify, but their clerk to save only manual correction of digital, this is not allowed, program files must not hand print out, the the auditor think this file invalid. I'm sorry, not on the document review, this is a very should not mistake, I will make them to modify and print the program files, and review it again to ensure that the correct. Some of the problems, as weekly quality goals and actual performance, training plan, inspection records, prenatal meetings, some just have a portion that does not meet the requirements, or the lack of a training record, so they relate to the link will be considered invalid, I think it is not fair to the factory. In addition, the Auditor told us, Shanghai TCPS received a report, said the factory without examination in children's products, so he must plant strictly review. I asked the factory, they are sure to reply to me, they have not done children's products, will not be, and I at the scene also did not see doing children's products. To this end, we lost a lot of points.
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询