2个回答
推荐于2017-12-15
展开全部
简爱 英文版读后感
Jane Eyre — A Beautiful Soul
Jane Eyre, is a poor but aspiring, small in body but huge in soul, obscure but self-respecting girl. After we close the covers of the book, after having a long journey of the spirit, Jane Eyre, a marvelous figure, has left us so much to recall and to think:
We remember her goodness: for someone who lost arms and blinded in eyes, for someone who despised her for her ordinariness, and even for someone who had hurt her deeply in the past.
We remember her pursuit of justice. It’s like a companion with the goodness. But still, a virtuous person should promote the goodness on one side and must check the badness on the other side.
We remember her self-respect and the clear situation on equality. In her opinion, everyone is the same at the God’s feet. Though there are differences in status、in property and also in appearance, but all the human being are equal in personality.
We also remember her striving for life, her toughness and her confidence…
When we think of this girl, what she gave us was not a pretty face or a transcendent temperament that make us admire deeply, but a huge charm of her personality.
Actually, she wasn’t pretty, and of course, the ordinary appearance didn’t make others feel good of her, even her own aunt felt disgusted with it. And some others even thought that she was easy to look down on and to tease, so when Miss Ingram met Jane Eyre, she seemed quite contemptuous, for that she was obviously much more prettier than ‘the plain and ugly governess’. But as the little governess had said: ‘Do you think, because I am poor, obscure, plain, and little, I am soulless and heartless? You think wrong!’ This is the idea of equality in Jane Eyre’s mind. God hadn’t given her beauty and wealth, but instead, God gave her a kind mind and a thinking brain. Her idea of equality and self-respect impress us so much and let us feel the power inside her body.
In my mind, though a person’s beauty on the face can make others once feel that one is attractive and charming, if his or her mind isn’t the same beautiful as the appearance, such as beauty cannot last for, when others find that the beauty which had charmed them was only a falsity, it’s not true, they will like the person no more. For a long time, only a person’s GREat virtue, a noble soul, a beautiful heart can be called as AN EVERLASTING BEAUTY, just as Kahill Gibran has said, that ‘Beauty is a heart enflamed and a soul enchanted’. I can feel that how beauty really is, as we are all fleshly men, so we can’t distinguish whether a man is of nobleness or humbleness, but fleshly men, so we can’t distinguish whether a man is of nobleness or humbleness, but as there are great differences in our souls, and from that, we can know that whether a man is noble or ordinary, and even obscure, that is, whether he is beautiful or not.
简爱英文版读后感
简爱-美丽的灵魂
简爱,是一个穷国,但有抱负的,小的机构,但巨大的灵魂,晦涩,而自尊的女孩。之后,我们密切的盖子书后,长途跋涉的精神,简爱,一个了不起的数字,给我们留下如此多的回顾和思考:
我们记住她的善良:有人谁失去了武器和失明的眼睛,有人谁鄙视她平凡,甚至有人谁深深伤害了她在过去的。
我们记得她追求正义。它就像同伴与善良。但是,一个良性的人应该促进善良的一面,必须检查恶的另一边。
我们记住她的自尊和明确的局势平等。她认为,每个人都相同的上帝的脚。尽管有不同的地位,财产,并在外观,但所有的人都是平等的人格。
我们还记得她争取的生活,她的韧性和她的信心...
当我们想到这个姑娘,她给了我们不是一个漂亮脸或超越的气质,使我们深感钦佩,但一个巨大的魅力,她的个性。
其实,她并不漂亮,当然,普通的外观并没有其他感觉良好的她,甚至她自己的姑姑觉得反感它。 ,有的甚至认为,她很容易看不起和取笑,因此当英格拉姆小姐会见了简爱,她似乎相当轻蔑的,因为这显然是她更漂亮比'平原和丑陋的教师' 。但是,正如一些教师说: '你是否认为,因为我是穷人,遮掩,平原,而且很少,我灵魂和良心?你以为错了! '的想法,这是平等的简爱的心灵。上帝没有给她的美貌和财富,而是上帝给了她一个样的思想和大脑思维。她的想法,平等和相互尊重使我们这么多,让我们感受到她的身体内权力。
在我的脑海,但一个人的美丽的脸可以使别人一旦认为是有吸引力和魅力,如果他或她的心是不一样的美丽的外观,如美容不能持续,当别人发现该美容了魅力他们只是一个谎言,这不是真的,他们将像没有更多的人。很长一段时间,只有一个人的伟大美德,高尚的灵魂,一个美丽的心可以被称为永恒的美丽,就像Kahill纪伯伦说,那是一个美丽的心和灵魂敲陶醉。我能感觉到,如何美容真的是,我们都肉欲男人,所以我们无法分辨一个人是高贵或谦逊,但肉体的男人,所以我们无法分辨一个人是高贵或谦逊,但由于有巨大的差别在我们的灵魂,从这一点,我们可以知道,无论一个人是崇高或普通,甚至掩盖,那就是,他是否是美丽的,或没有。
Jane Eyre — A Beautiful Soul
Jane Eyre, is a poor but aspiring, small in body but huge in soul, obscure but self-respecting girl. After we close the covers of the book, after having a long journey of the spirit, Jane Eyre, a marvelous figure, has left us so much to recall and to think:
We remember her goodness: for someone who lost arms and blinded in eyes, for someone who despised her for her ordinariness, and even for someone who had hurt her deeply in the past.
We remember her pursuit of justice. It’s like a companion with the goodness. But still, a virtuous person should promote the goodness on one side and must check the badness on the other side.
We remember her self-respect and the clear situation on equality. In her opinion, everyone is the same at the God’s feet. Though there are differences in status、in property and also in appearance, but all the human being are equal in personality.
We also remember her striving for life, her toughness and her confidence…
When we think of this girl, what she gave us was not a pretty face or a transcendent temperament that make us admire deeply, but a huge charm of her personality.
Actually, she wasn’t pretty, and of course, the ordinary appearance didn’t make others feel good of her, even her own aunt felt disgusted with it. And some others even thought that she was easy to look down on and to tease, so when Miss Ingram met Jane Eyre, she seemed quite contemptuous, for that she was obviously much more prettier than ‘the plain and ugly governess’. But as the little governess had said: ‘Do you think, because I am poor, obscure, plain, and little, I am soulless and heartless? You think wrong!’ This is the idea of equality in Jane Eyre’s mind. God hadn’t given her beauty and wealth, but instead, God gave her a kind mind and a thinking brain. Her idea of equality and self-respect impress us so much and let us feel the power inside her body.
In my mind, though a person’s beauty on the face can make others once feel that one is attractive and charming, if his or her mind isn’t the same beautiful as the appearance, such as beauty cannot last for, when others find that the beauty which had charmed them was only a falsity, it’s not true, they will like the person no more. For a long time, only a person’s GREat virtue, a noble soul, a beautiful heart can be called as AN EVERLASTING BEAUTY, just as Kahill Gibran has said, that ‘Beauty is a heart enflamed and a soul enchanted’. I can feel that how beauty really is, as we are all fleshly men, so we can’t distinguish whether a man is of nobleness or humbleness, but fleshly men, so we can’t distinguish whether a man is of nobleness or humbleness, but as there are great differences in our souls, and from that, we can know that whether a man is noble or ordinary, and even obscure, that is, whether he is beautiful or not.
简爱英文版读后感
简爱-美丽的灵魂
简爱,是一个穷国,但有抱负的,小的机构,但巨大的灵魂,晦涩,而自尊的女孩。之后,我们密切的盖子书后,长途跋涉的精神,简爱,一个了不起的数字,给我们留下如此多的回顾和思考:
我们记住她的善良:有人谁失去了武器和失明的眼睛,有人谁鄙视她平凡,甚至有人谁深深伤害了她在过去的。
我们记得她追求正义。它就像同伴与善良。但是,一个良性的人应该促进善良的一面,必须检查恶的另一边。
我们记住她的自尊和明确的局势平等。她认为,每个人都相同的上帝的脚。尽管有不同的地位,财产,并在外观,但所有的人都是平等的人格。
我们还记得她争取的生活,她的韧性和她的信心...
当我们想到这个姑娘,她给了我们不是一个漂亮脸或超越的气质,使我们深感钦佩,但一个巨大的魅力,她的个性。
其实,她并不漂亮,当然,普通的外观并没有其他感觉良好的她,甚至她自己的姑姑觉得反感它。 ,有的甚至认为,她很容易看不起和取笑,因此当英格拉姆小姐会见了简爱,她似乎相当轻蔑的,因为这显然是她更漂亮比'平原和丑陋的教师' 。但是,正如一些教师说: '你是否认为,因为我是穷人,遮掩,平原,而且很少,我灵魂和良心?你以为错了! '的想法,这是平等的简爱的心灵。上帝没有给她的美貌和财富,而是上帝给了她一个样的思想和大脑思维。她的想法,平等和相互尊重使我们这么多,让我们感受到她的身体内权力。
在我的脑海,但一个人的美丽的脸可以使别人一旦认为是有吸引力和魅力,如果他或她的心是不一样的美丽的外观,如美容不能持续,当别人发现该美容了魅力他们只是一个谎言,这不是真的,他们将像没有更多的人。很长一段时间,只有一个人的伟大美德,高尚的灵魂,一个美丽的心可以被称为永恒的美丽,就像Kahill纪伯伦说,那是一个美丽的心和灵魂敲陶醉。我能感觉到,如何美容真的是,我们都肉欲男人,所以我们无法分辨一个人是高贵或谦逊,但肉体的男人,所以我们无法分辨一个人是高贵或谦逊,但由于有巨大的差别在我们的灵魂,从这一点,我们可以知道,无论一个人是崇高或普通,甚至掩盖,那就是,他是否是美丽的,或没有。
2013-03-29
展开全部
MOVIE: Mission Impossible III
While Summer isn't officially here, it is here in terms of movies. Mission Impossible 3 kicks off the summer movie season with a bang with an interesting and entertaining installment in the money-making franchise. Tom Cruise reprises his Ethan Hunt role and J.J. Abrams takes the director's chair. What makes the Mission Impossible franchise so interesting is the constant change of directors. If you look at other franchises like Lethal Weapon, Pink Panther, Indiana Jones, etc, the directors usually stay on board for the sequels. Even with the James Bond franchise you have directors usually doing several Bond films in a row. Mission Impossible was helmed by Brian De Palma and was all espionage with light action. Action maestro John Woo took the second one and made an explosive and entertaining action sequel even if it was a little over cooked. J.J. Abrams makes his feature film directorial debut with Mission Impossible 3, which is a little bit of espionage and a little bit of action. For those who don't know Abrams, he started out writing films like Armageddon and Regarding Henry. He then broke into the television scene with Alias, a pretty popular show. He became very well known recently for his latest show. Abrams is the creator of LOST, one of my favorite shows. So, I was excited to see his first movie. M:I-3 has Ethan Hunt trying to settle down and start a normal life, but he is thrown back into his old job when an arms dealer played by Phillip Seymour Hoffman wants him to track down the Rabbit's Foot. The Rabbit's Foot is some kind of weapon of mass destruction, and if Hunt doesn't retrieve it in 48 hours his fiance will be killed. What follows are explosive action sequences that sing the right tune to satisfy all of our action appetites. The movie is good, but I couldn't help feeling like something was lacking. I tried to pinpoint it, and the only thing that I could come up with was that it lacked style. Sure it had LOST written all over it. The tight close ups, starting the film by showing the ending and then rewinding back to the beginning, getting Michael Giacchino to compose an almost identical score to LOST, even re-creating a scene from LOST at the end, but still the movie didn't feel like it had an overall style. The reason why I liked M:I-2 was that it had John Woo style. The slow motion build up, the doves, and of course Hans Zimmer's amazing music. I'm just saying that Mission Impossible 3 is good, but it's not a definative action movie that stands out from the rest, let's see how Abrams develops his techniques with future projects now that he's broken into the movie scene. 答案补充 中文你就自己翻译一下吧 中个工具 然后自己改改就好了啊
While Summer isn't officially here, it is here in terms of movies. Mission Impossible 3 kicks off the summer movie season with a bang with an interesting and entertaining installment in the money-making franchise. Tom Cruise reprises his Ethan Hunt role and J.J. Abrams takes the director's chair. What makes the Mission Impossible franchise so interesting is the constant change of directors. If you look at other franchises like Lethal Weapon, Pink Panther, Indiana Jones, etc, the directors usually stay on board for the sequels. Even with the James Bond franchise you have directors usually doing several Bond films in a row. Mission Impossible was helmed by Brian De Palma and was all espionage with light action. Action maestro John Woo took the second one and made an explosive and entertaining action sequel even if it was a little over cooked. J.J. Abrams makes his feature film directorial debut with Mission Impossible 3, which is a little bit of espionage and a little bit of action. For those who don't know Abrams, he started out writing films like Armageddon and Regarding Henry. He then broke into the television scene with Alias, a pretty popular show. He became very well known recently for his latest show. Abrams is the creator of LOST, one of my favorite shows. So, I was excited to see his first movie. M:I-3 has Ethan Hunt trying to settle down and start a normal life, but he is thrown back into his old job when an arms dealer played by Phillip Seymour Hoffman wants him to track down the Rabbit's Foot. The Rabbit's Foot is some kind of weapon of mass destruction, and if Hunt doesn't retrieve it in 48 hours his fiance will be killed. What follows are explosive action sequences that sing the right tune to satisfy all of our action appetites. The movie is good, but I couldn't help feeling like something was lacking. I tried to pinpoint it, and the only thing that I could come up with was that it lacked style. Sure it had LOST written all over it. The tight close ups, starting the film by showing the ending and then rewinding back to the beginning, getting Michael Giacchino to compose an almost identical score to LOST, even re-creating a scene from LOST at the end, but still the movie didn't feel like it had an overall style. The reason why I liked M:I-2 was that it had John Woo style. The slow motion build up, the doves, and of course Hans Zimmer's amazing music. I'm just saying that Mission Impossible 3 is good, but it's not a definative action movie that stands out from the rest, let's see how Abrams develops his techniques with future projects now that he's broken into the movie scene. 答案补充 中文你就自己翻译一下吧 中个工具 然后自己改改就好了啊
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询