5个回答
展开全部
如果the way后面的定语从句缺少the way这样的主语或宾语时,则关系代词可以使用which或that。
如:Do you understand the way which was explained by me just now?
你理解了刚才被我解释的那个方法吗?
which代指先行词the way,在定语从句___ was explained by me just now中明显充当主语,可以使用关系代词which.
另:如果the way后面的定语从句缺少in the way这样的状语时,则关系词可以使用in which 或 that 或 省略不用关系词。
再如:I dislike the way you speak to me.
= I dislike the way in which you speak to me.
= I dislike the way that you speak to me.
定语从句为:you speak to me (in the way) 你以这种方式和我说话
如果对你有所帮助,请点击我回答下面的“选为满意回答”按钮,谢谢!
如:Do you understand the way which was explained by me just now?
你理解了刚才被我解释的那个方法吗?
which代指先行词the way,在定语从句___ was explained by me just now中明显充当主语,可以使用关系代词which.
另:如果the way后面的定语从句缺少in the way这样的状语时,则关系词可以使用in which 或 that 或 省略不用关系词。
再如:I dislike the way you speak to me.
= I dislike the way in which you speak to me.
= I dislike the way that you speak to me.
定语从句为:you speak to me (in the way) 你以这种方式和我说话
如果对你有所帮助,请点击我回答下面的“选为满意回答”按钮,谢谢!
展开全部
定语从句,一般情况下 the way作先行词 that/which/不填 都是可以的。。但是,当the way作主语时不能用“不填”。。。比如,the way that/which/不填 you choose is quite different.这里the way 是choose的宾语。。。 the way which /that is very unique to me.这里the way是主语。。。你以后还会看到the way in which/that/不填。。这是状语从句。比如The way that/which/不填 he explained to us was quite simple.
the way that/in which/不填 he explained the sentence to us was not difficult to understand.两句中,第一句是定语从句,the way 作explain的宾语。而第二句是状语,因为the sentence作了explain的宾语,该句是完整的句子,而that/in which/不填 he explained the sentence to us 是状语从句,用来修饰the way。
the way that/in which/不填 he explained the sentence to us was not difficult to understand.两句中,第一句是定语从句,the way 作explain的宾语。而第二句是状语,因为the sentence作了explain的宾语,该句是完整的句子,而that/in which/不填 he explained the sentence to us 是状语从句,用来修饰the way。
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
当way表示方式的时候,(词组通常是in the way...)
举例: Do you know the way in which we make a paperplane?
(你知道做纸飞机的方法么?)
举例: Do you know the way in which we make a paperplane?
(你知道做纸飞机的方法么?)
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
没有带which用的, the way that+句子
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
展开全部
怎么选择题没选项?只好根据自己的理解给你解答一下:做定语从句的思路就是,把先行词放入后面的定语从句中看是否完整,1.如完整则只需考虑人或事物;2.若不完整则考虑加介词或's;介词+which有时可转换为when、where,for
which=why,
介词+whom不能转化;'s的用whose。
1.where
先行词为London;
some
time
later
,
he
became
a
famous
actor
in
London;in
London=in
which=where;此句先行词被in
1996隔开,且1996不会是先行词,因从句中已有时间some
time
later
。
2.
whose
先行词为the
man,
the
thief
had
stolen
the
TV
set
from
the
man's
room,
the
man's=
whose;from
the
man's
room=
from
whose
room
3.
此句看不懂??是不是打错了?如果一定要做的话,只能填which,which指代前面整个句子,但这里又不肯能是定语从句,因前面是if引导的条件状语从句,后面如果还是从句,那主句呢?因此要么此句打错,要么只能用it/that,这样语法上才通,但没什么意义。“如果一本书是用英语写的,这对你就意味着缓慢的进步。”???
4.
where
Those
successful
deaf
dancers
think
that
dancing
is
an
activity
__
sight
matters
more
than
hearing.
先行词an
activity,
sight
matters
more
than
hearing
in
the
activity.
in
the
activity
=in
which=where.
那些聋的舞者认为舞蹈是一项视觉比听觉更重要的活动。
which=why,
介词+whom不能转化;'s的用whose。
1.where
先行词为London;
some
time
later
,
he
became
a
famous
actor
in
London;in
London=in
which=where;此句先行词被in
1996隔开,且1996不会是先行词,因从句中已有时间some
time
later
。
2.
whose
先行词为the
man,
the
thief
had
stolen
the
TV
set
from
the
man's
room,
the
man's=
whose;from
the
man's
room=
from
whose
room
3.
此句看不懂??是不是打错了?如果一定要做的话,只能填which,which指代前面整个句子,但这里又不肯能是定语从句,因前面是if引导的条件状语从句,后面如果还是从句,那主句呢?因此要么此句打错,要么只能用it/that,这样语法上才通,但没什么意义。“如果一本书是用英语写的,这对你就意味着缓慢的进步。”???
4.
where
Those
successful
deaf
dancers
think
that
dancing
is
an
activity
__
sight
matters
more
than
hearing.
先行词an
activity,
sight
matters
more
than
hearing
in
the
activity.
in
the
activity
=in
which=where.
那些聋的舞者认为舞蹈是一项视觉比听觉更重要的活动。
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询