
急求法律英语达人帮忙翻译一下~!英译中~
拒绝翻译软件...真的很急,谢谢Therelevanceofspecificevidenceisdeterminedinrelationtothescopeoftheis...
拒绝翻译软件...真的很急,谢谢
The relevance of specific evidence is determined in relation to the scope of the issues in the case at hand. Irrelevant evidence is excluded in order to aid the trier of fact in focusing on what actually is in issue. Privileged matter is excluded to protect the privacy of individuals in certain relationships (e. g, doctor-patient, lawyer-client). Persons in a privileged relationship need not reveal any communications that occurred between them. The law places a greater value on preserving the sanctity of those relationships than on the need to find truth based on all the possible evidence. Hearsay is defined as an out-of-court statement offered to prove the fact or truth of the matter stated. The rules defining hearsay are riddled with exceptions. In general, the prohibition against the use of hearsay evidence exists because hearsay is deemed inherently unreliable because there is no opportunity to cross-examine the actual person who made the statement. The exceptions that are recognized typically involve situations in which other circumstance appear to ensure that the evidence is reliable( such as the exception for the introduction of records created during the day to day operation of a business), or in which there does not appear to be other evidence that could be used to prove the matter at issue(such as statements by a person regarding his motives). 展开
The relevance of specific evidence is determined in relation to the scope of the issues in the case at hand. Irrelevant evidence is excluded in order to aid the trier of fact in focusing on what actually is in issue. Privileged matter is excluded to protect the privacy of individuals in certain relationships (e. g, doctor-patient, lawyer-client). Persons in a privileged relationship need not reveal any communications that occurred between them. The law places a greater value on preserving the sanctity of those relationships than on the need to find truth based on all the possible evidence. Hearsay is defined as an out-of-court statement offered to prove the fact or truth of the matter stated. The rules defining hearsay are riddled with exceptions. In general, the prohibition against the use of hearsay evidence exists because hearsay is deemed inherently unreliable because there is no opportunity to cross-examine the actual person who made the statement. The exceptions that are recognized typically involve situations in which other circumstance appear to ensure that the evidence is reliable( such as the exception for the introduction of records created during the day to day operation of a business), or in which there does not appear to be other evidence that could be used to prove the matter at issue(such as statements by a person regarding his motives). 展开
1个回答
展开全部
相关的具体证据是确定的有关问题的范围,在本案中,一方面。不相干的证据排除在以援助特里尔事实上,在重点是什么,实际上是在问题。享有特权的问题被排除在保护个人隐私,在某些关系(如克,医生和病人,律师-客户端)。人在一个特殊的关系不必透露任何通讯之间发生。法律的地方有更大的价值就维护神圣的这些关系比对需要寻找真理的基础上的所有可能的证据。传闻被界定为一个彻头彻尾的庭外发表声明提供证明的事实或事情的真相。规则界定的传闻是千疮百孔的例外。在一般的,禁止使用传闻证据的存在,是因为传闻被认为是根本不可靠,是因为有没有机会,以两岸研究实际的人谁发表声明。例外情况是公认的通常涉及在何种情况下其他情况下出现,以确保该证据是可靠的(如例外引进的纪录,期间创建的日常运作业务) ,或在其中似乎不存在其他的证据可以用来证明此事的问题(如报表,由一个人关于他的动机) 。
参考
参考
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询