Question

急求法律英语达人帮忙翻译一下~!英译中~

拒绝翻译软件...真的很急,谢谢
Counsel must raise evidentiary objections immediately or they will be waived. In addition, in the case of privileged information, the parties to the relationship can waive their right to claim privilege by their conduct. If an objection is sustained, the evidence will be stricken or the jury will be instructed not to take it into account in rendering the verdict. A judge trial often is a little less rigid in adhering strictly to the evidentiary rules because it is assumed that the judge will disregard improper evidence and consider only proper evidence. Thus, there is less need for the lawyers to object as frequently. Similarly, there is less fear that improper evidence will be considered if the court sustains an objection. In the jury setting, there is a serious question whether it is reasonable to expect the jurors to disregard improper evidence that is mentioned in their presence, even if instructed to do so, or whether the jury has been so prejudiced that a mistrial should be called

Answer 1

律师必须提出证据反对立即或他们将被豁免。此外，在案件保密的资料，各方的关系，可以放弃其权利要求享有特权，他们的行为。如果有人提出反对，是持续，证据将受灾或陪审团将指示没有考虑到在绘制判决。一名法官审判，往往是少僵化，在严格遵守证据规则，因为它是假设，法官会不顾不当的证据，并只考虑适当的证据。因此，有少需要律师的对象那样频繁。同样地，有少担心不当的证据，将被视为如果法院维持反对。在陪审团设置，有一个严重的问题，是否是合理的期望陪审员无视不当的证据，这是中提及他们的存在，即使指示这样做，或是否陪审团已使偏见，应称为认为误判

参考