跪求!!!!!!! 英文高手,翻译!急急急!!! 100

请帮我翻译一下下面这段话!戴尔`卡耐基给青年人的忠告:争论的结果,十之八九会使双方比从前更相信自己绝对正确。你赢不了争论。要是输了,当然你就输了;如果赢了,还是输了。所以... 请帮我翻译一下 下面这段话!
戴尔`卡耐基给青年人的忠告:争论的结果,十之八九会使双方比从前更相信自己绝对正确。你赢不了争论。要是输了,当然你就输了;如果赢了,还是输了。所以,最好的办法是避免争论。
两千年以前,耶稣说过:“尽快同意反对你的人。”
如果要别人同意你,请尊重别人的意见,切勿直接指出对方错了。因为这样会引起争论。
即使在争论中你胜利了,使对方的论点被攻击得千疮百孔,证明他一无是处,那又怎么样?你会觉得洋洋自得。但他呢?你使他自惭。你伤了他的自尊,他会怨恨你的胜利。而且一个人即使口服,但心里并不服。
如果你老是争辩、反驳,也许偶尔能获胜;但那是空洞的胜利,因为你永远得不到对方的好感。
你在争论中可能有理,但要想改变别人的主意,你就错得使你一切都是徒劳的。
不论对方的聪明才智如何,你也不可能靠辩论改变任何人的想法。
争论是要不得的,甚至连最不露痕迹的争论也要不得。如果你老是抬杠、反驳,即使偶尔获得胜利,却永远得不到对方的好感。
真正赢得胜利的方法不是争论,而是不要争论。
翻译软件翻译的 不要
展开
 我来答
gbcl
2008-06-18 · TA获得超过4229个赞
知道大有可为答主
回答量:2788
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:2196万
展开全部
The Dell `card bears the base to young people's advice: Argument's result, will cause both sides to believe the absolutely correct most likely compared to the past. You could not win the argument. If has lost, certainly you lost; If has won, lost. Therefore, the best means are avoid arguing. before two millenniums, Jesus has said: “agreed as soon as possible opposes you the person.” if wants others to agree with you, please respect others the opinion, is sure not to point out directly opposite party was wrong. Because like this will give rise to controversy. even if you have won in the argument, causes opposite party argument to attack tattered and torn, proves him to have no merit to speak, that is also what kind of? You will think self-satisfied. But he? You cause him to feel ashamed. You have injuried his self-respect, he will hate your victory. Moreover a person, even if takes orally, but at heart and refuses to accept. if you always argue, the rebuttal, perhaps occasionally can win; But that is the empty victory, because you forever cannot obtain opposite party favorable impression. you in argument possible rational, but if wants to change others' mind, you on are wrong cause your all are the futile effort. no matter the opposite party intelligence and ability how, you impossible to change anybody's idea depending on the debate. the argument is intolerable, even links the argument which most not shows to be also intolerable. If you always bicker, the rebuttal, even if occasionally achieves the success, actually forever cannot obtain opposite party favorable impression. wins the victory the method is not the argument truly, but do not argue.
氓氓123
2008-06-18 · TA获得超过741个赞
知道小有建树答主
回答量:430
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:133万
展开全部
Please help me translate the following piece of it!
Dell `Carnegie's advice to young people: the results of controversy, most likely will make both sides more than ever believe they absolutely right. You can not win arguments. If lost, of course, you will lose, if won, or lost. Therefore, the best approach is to avoid controversy.
Two thousand years ago, Jesus said: "You agree as soon as possible against the people."
If others agree with you, please respect other people's views, not to direct that the other side wrong. Because it will arouse controversy.
Even in the argument that you won, so that the other side's argument was attacked in the Qianchuangbaikong to prove that he useless, So what » You will find Yangyangzide. But he is » He Zi Can you make. You hurt his self-esteem, he will hate you the victory. But even if a person orally, but the mind and refused to accept.
If Nilao is argued, argued, and perhaps occasionally to win, but that is an empty victory, because you never be each other's goodwill.
You may be justified in the debate, but to change other people's ideas, you are wrong in that you all will be futile.
Regardless of how each other's intelligence and wisdom, you can not rely on the debate to change anyone's mind.
Controversy is undesirable and even the most Buluhenji controversy may not have to. If Nilao is Taigang to refute, even the occasional victory, but never be each other's goodwill.
The real way to win is not a debate, but not controversial.
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
qb2008will
2008-06-18 · TA获得超过693个赞
知道小有建树答主
回答量:612
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:159万
展开全部
Dell Carnegie's sincere advice that gives to young people: The result disputed, will make both sides believe oneself even more than in the past correctly absolutely in eight or nine cases out of ten. You win and dispute. If fail, certainly you fail; If win, or fail. So, the best method is to avoid being disputed. 2,000 years ago, Jesus said: "Agree to object to the person of you as soon as possible. "If others agree with you, please respect others' opinion, make sure not to point out directly the other side is wrong. Because will be controversial in this way. Even you victory, make argument of the other side attack riddled with gaping wounds in not disputing, prove him a bundle of negatives, so what? You will feel complacent. But he? You make him feel ashamed. You have injured his self-respect, he will hate your victory. And even a person takes orally, but refuse to obey in the heart. If you always argue, refute, perhaps can win once in a while; But that is an empty victory, because you can not get the other side's good opinion forever. You may be reasonable in disputing, but want to change others' idea, everything is futile that you must enable you by mistake. Regardless of intelligence and wisdom of the other side, you can not be by argueing the idea which change anyone either. It is intolerable to dispute, even the dispute betraying nothing in expression and movements most is intolerable. If you always argue, refute, even obtain the victory once in a while, but forever Can't get the other side's good opinion far. The method to really win the victory is not to dispute, but don't dispute.
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
一剑小天下
2008-06-18 · TA获得超过3600个赞
知道小有建树答主
回答量:1752
采纳率:28%
帮助的人:433万
展开全部
Dell Carnegie advise to young people:The controversial results of the two sides will most likely believe in themselves more than ever absolutely right. You can't win the arguement.If lost, of course, you lose;If won, or lost.Therefore, the best approach is to avoid controversy.
Two thousand years ago, Jesus said: "The opposition agreed that as soon as you people."
If others agree with you, please respect other people's views, not to direct that the other side wrong.Because it will arouse controversy.
Even in the argument that you won, so that the other side's argument was attacked in the Qianchuangbaikong to prove that he useless, So what? You will fill very proud.But what about him? You make him ashamed.You hurt his self-esteem, he will hate you the victory.But even if a person orally, but the mind is refused to accept.
If you always argued, disproved, perhaps occasionally can win;But that victory was hollow, because you never be each other's goodwill.
You may be justified in the debate, but to change other people's ideas, you are wrong in that you all will be futile.
Regardless of how each other's intelligence and wisdom, you can not rely on the debate to change anyone's mind.
The controversy is undesirable, even the most covert argument may not be.If you always refute, even the occasional victory, but never be each other's goodwill.
The real way to win is not a debate, but not controversial.
本回答被网友采纳
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
甘草片儿
2008-06-18 · TA获得超过2368个赞
知道小有建树答主
回答量:359
采纳率:0%
帮助的人:336万
展开全部
机译的都往这儿摆,还真敢
已赞过 已踩过<
你对这个回答的评价是?
评论 收起
收起 更多回答(3)
推荐律师服务: 若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询

为你推荐:

下载百度知道APP,抢鲜体验
使用百度知道APP,立即抢鲜体验。你的手机镜头里或许有别人想知道的答案。
扫描二维码下载
×

类别

我们会通过消息、邮箱等方式尽快将举报结果通知您。

说明

0/200

提交
取消

辅 助

模 式