Question

谁能帮我翻译一下英语啊？？？英语翻译(急)

一）CBH3110-A/N

1.图面尺寸7.9±0.3mm 尺寸波动比较大，无法做到此规格，可否协商为参考尺寸？

2.之前有向贵司反馈，此款弹簧我司做了扭力偏大. 现收到贵司样品及贵司提供的一对一扭力数据，我们对其中8PCS用我们的测力机台进行测量，与贵司的数据进行对比，如下所示：

客供样品CBH3110-A/N 扭力测量对比（单位：N）
编号 扭力1（迈进测量） 扭力1（联科测量） 　 扭力2（迈进测量） 扭力2（联科测量）
1 0.520 0.606 0.887 1.030
2 0.484 0.570 0.888 0.965
3 0.500 0.568 0.900 0.966
4 0.471 0.591 0.889 0.958
5 0.517 0.581 0.917 0.965
6 0.497 0.583 0.921 0.991
7 0.514 0.605 0.941 0.996
8 0.498 0.587 0.866 0.973
　 　 　 　 　
平均值 0.500 0.586 0.901 0.981
最大值 0.520 0.606 0.941 1.030
最小值 0.471 0.568 0.866 0.958

上面数据所示，同一个弹簧，按我司的测量结果，两段扭力都比贵司测量的大0.08 N 左右.

分析原因可能由于测力机台的精度及测量上的误差所致，但为进一步找出问题所在，请贵司也帮忙确认以下几点疑问：

A.因为按照图面上的参数，理想状态下，我们计算弹簧的两段扭力值分别为：0.53 N ；0.96 N ，这个数据与上面我们测量的数据都不一致！

所以，我们在猜想，图面上的两段扭力值0.4903 N 及0.8929 N 是否根据弹簧实测力值写上去的？？ 还是根据计算结果而定？

如果是根据实测值写上去的，因为每家弹簧厂测量数据都有出入，对于我们来说，无法做到与图面要求一致！！

B.按照做弹簧的经验，一般情况下，由于实测结果与理论计算有出入，导致扭簧的自由角与扭力不能同时满足，我们只能保证其中之一，即保证力值，自由角作参考，或者保证自由角，力值实测为准.

而对于此款弹簧，本身自由角公差93o±5o也不是很大，还需要管控两段力值，这样在制作上是有困难的，考虑到以上的各种原因，我司希望这款弹簧的扭力值可以作为参考，保证93o±5o为主..请贵司评估能否接受！！

Answer 1

ON划词翻译ON实时翻译
一）CBH3110-A/N
A) CBH3110-A/N
1.图面尺寸7.9±0.3mm 尺寸波动比较大，无法做到此规格，可否协商为参考尺寸？
1 map size 7.9 + 0.3mm size volatility is relatively large, can not do this specification,can consult as the reference dimensions?
2.之前有向贵司反馈，此款弹簧我司做了扭力偏大. 现收到贵司样品及贵司提供的一对一扭力数据，我们对其中8PCS用我们的测力机台进行测量，与贵司的数据进行对比，如下所示：
2 before the feedback to your company, this spring our torque is large. We received your samples and your company offers one to one in which 8PCS torque data, we use our force measuring machine for measurement, compared with your company's data,as shown below:
客供样品CBH3110-A/N 扭力测量樱拍对比（单位：N）
Customers for sample CBH3110-A/N torque measuring contrast (unit: N)
编号 扭力1（迈进测量） 扭力1（联科测量） 扭力2（迈进测量） 扭力2（联科测量）
Number 1 (towards the measurement of torque torsion) 1 (UNOCI measuring torque(2) forward measurement) torsion 2 (UNOCI measurement)
1 0.520 0.606 0.887 1.030
10.520 0.606 0.887 1.030
2 0.484 0.570 0.888 0.965
20.484 0.570 0.888 0.965
3 0.500 0.568 0.900 0.966
30.500 0.568 0.900 0.966
4 0.471 0.591 0.889 0.958
40.471 0.591 0.889 0.958
5 0.517 0.581 0.917 0.965
50.517 0.581 0.917 0.965
6 0.497 0.583 0.921 0.991
60.497 0.583 0.921 0.991
7 0.514 0.605 0.941 0.996
70.514 0.605 0.941 0.996
8 0.498 0.587 0.866 0.973
80.498 0.587 0.866 0.973
平均值 0.500 0.586 0.901 0.981
The average value of 0.500 0.586 0.901 0.981
最大值 0.520 0.606 0.941 1.030
The maximum value of 0.520 0.606 0.941 1.030
最小值 0.471 0.568 0.866 0.958
A minimum of 0.471 0.568 0.866 0.958
上面数据所示，同一个弹簧，按我司的枯颂迅测没此量结果，两段扭力都比贵司测量的大0.08 N 左右.
As shown in the above data, the same spring, according to the measurement results of Division I, two section torque than the expensive department measurement high of about 0.08 N.
分析原因可能由于测力机台的精度及测量上的误差所致，但为进一步找出问题所在，请贵司也帮忙确认以下几点疑问：
Analysis of the reasons may be due to error in precision and measuring force measuring machine table, but to further identify the problem, please the expensive department also help to confirm the following questions:
A.因为按照图面上的参数，理想状态下，我们计算弹簧的两段扭力值分别为：0.53 N ；0.96 N ，这个数据与上面我们测量的数据都不一致！
A. because according to the parameter map surface, under ideal conditions, we calculated the spring two section torque values were: 0.53 N; 0.96 N, this data with the above we measured data are not consistent!
所以，我们在猜想，图面上的两段扭力值0.4903 N 及0.8929 N 是否根据弹簧实测力值写上去的？？ 还是根据计算结果而定？
Therefore, we guess, figure on the surface of the two section torque value of 0.4903 N and 0.8929 N is measured according to the spring force value write up?? Andaccording to the calculation results and decide?
如果是根据实测值写上去的，因为每家弹簧厂测量数据都有出入，对于我们来说，无法做到与图面要求一致！！
If it is according to the measured value to write down, because every spring factorymeasurement data have access, for us, to be consistent with the requirement of drawings!!
B.按照做弹簧的经验，一般情况下，由于实测结果与理论计算有出入，导致扭簧的自由角与扭力不能同时满足，我们只能保证其中之一，即保证力值，自由角作参考，或者保证自由角，力值实测为准.
B. according to do spring experience, in general, as the experimental results and theoretical calculation of discrepancies, lead free angle and torsion spring torque can not satisfy, one of which we can only guarantee, namely guarantee force value, freeangle for reference, or to guarantee free angle, stress value measured as the standard.
而对于此款弹簧，本身自由角公差93o±5o也不是很大，还需要管控两段力值，这样在制作上是有困难的，考虑到以上的各种原因，我司希望这款弹簧的扭力值可以作为参考，保证93o±5o为主..请贵司评估能否接受！！
But for this section of the spring, itself free angle tolerance 93o + 5O is not very big,also need to control two sections of force value, so it is difficult to manufacture,considering a variety of reasons, our hope this spring torsion value can be used as a reference, ensure that the 93o + 5O Based.. please the expensive department to assess whether accept!!
一句话一句话翻译好慢啊
在平时，我早翻译出来了

Answer 2

1 map size 7.9 + 0.3mm size volatility is relatively large, can not do this specification, can consult as the reference dimensions?
2 before the feedback to your company, this spring our torque is large. Wereceived your samples and your company offers one to one in which 8PCStorque data, we use our force measuring machine for measurement, compared with your company's data, as shown below:
Customers for sample CBH3110-A/N torque measuring contrast (unit: N)
Number 1 (towards the measurement of torque torsion) 1 (UNOCI measuringtorque (2) forward measurement) torsion 2 (UNOCI measurement)
10.520 0.606 0.887 1.030
20.484 0.570 0.888 0.965
30.500 0.568 0.900 0.966
40.471 0.591 0.889 0.958
50.517 0.581 0.917 0.965
60.497 0.583 0.921 0.991
70.514 0.605 0.941 0.996
80.498 0.587 0.866 0.973
The average value of 0.500 0.586 0.901 0.981
The maximum value of 0.520 0.606 0.941 1.030
A minimum of 0.471 0.568 0.866 0.958
As shown in the above data, the same spring, according to the measurementresults of Division I, two section torque than the expensive departmentmeasurement high of about 0.08 N.
Analysis of the reasons may be due to error in precision and measuring force measuring machine table, but to further identify the problem, please the expensive department also help to confirm the following questions:
A. because according to the parameter map surface, under ideal conditions, we calculated the spring two section torque values were: 0.53 N; 0.96 N, this data with the above we measured data are not consistent!
Therefore, we guess, figure on the surface of the two section torque value of 0.4903 N and 0.8929 N is measured according to the spring force value write up?? And according to the calculation results and decide?
If it is according to the measured value to write down, because every spring factory measurement data have access, for us, to be consistent with therequirement of drawings!!
B. according to do spring experience, in general, as the experimental results and theoretical calculation of discrepancies, lead free angle and torsion spring torquecan not satisfy, one of which we can only guarantee, namely guarantee force value, free angle for reference, or to guarantee free angle, stress valuemeasured as the standard.
But for this section of the spring, itself free angle tolerance 93o + 5O is not very big, also need to control two sections of force value, so it is difficult tomanufacture, considering a variety of reasons, our hope this spring torsion valuecan be used as a reference, ensure that the 93o + 5O Based.. please the expensive department to assess whether accept!!