Question

急求关于高考看法的英语作文

how effective does the colldge entrance examination measure our ability and competence ? does this system select all those who should be failed?

Answer 1

When it comes to the college entrance examination, people usually have a saying, " after all is fair ". I think not, and said, this is truly a doublespeak. College entrance examination has never justice; justice and happiness, never absolute.
From an examination of the identified, could be clearly seen, its purpose is to choose some people, instead of giving all give the so-called fair, objective has already established its injustice, not because it means is disclosed that it is fair, there is no test high school graduates are not eligible for social education resources? For various reasons, failed after suffering the students, their pain is deserved? Besides, originally around the education level is not the same, and the college entrance examination because of each district enrollment allocation number is over, obtain fractional line is not the same, is this fair?
But today we come to see, we can not because of starving when getting a steamed bread of happiness, and thought the steamed bread is always our happiness. Just, fair is always relative, happiness is relative, we should review and revise for many years as a "good thing " behind the defect.
说到高考，人们通常都有一种说法，说“毕竟是公正的”。回头我想想，跟不上说，这实在是一个欺人之谈。高考从来也没有公正过；公正和幸福一样，从来也没有绝对的。
从一个考试的确定，可以清清楚楚地看到，它的目的是为了选择一些人，而不是给所有的全体给予所谓的公正，目的已经确定了它的不公正，不因为它选择所采取的手段是公开的就说它是公正的，难道那些没有考上的高中毕业生就没有资格获得社会的高等教育的资源了吗？因为各种各样的原因，落榜后痛苦的学生们，他们的痛苦是应得的吗？再说，本来各地的教育水平就不一样，而高考因为各地招生人数的人为分配数目不一，各地的考取分数线又不一样，这难道是公平的吗？
但今天我们来看，我们不能因为快饿死的时候获得一个馒头的幸福，而以为这个馒头永远是我们的幸福。公正、公平永远是相对的，幸福也是相对的，我们早应该检讨并且修正持续多年的一件“好事情”背后的缺陷了。