求改雅思作文！！
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
答案：
Life is a one-way train and everyone has its own orientation. Some people enjoy their trip going to only one direction, while others believe that change to another direction when a station comes is a kind of good experience. Personally, I think that whether to change or not depends on different people.
Firstly, in my view, the main reason of those who do not want a change is that they need a stable life, which their families and children can benefit from it. A team of Australian researchers have calmed that those children whose parents always change their works or living environment actually did not enjoy their childhood. Also, most of them complained that they cannot keep a long-term relationship with their friends or classmates. So, stable life environment is really necessary for those people having kids.
However, people who agree with the idea that change is always a good thing can be thought as having the coverage of facing an unpredictable adventures. A report from Beijing University shows that about 60% of students who study in universities feel boring about their peaceful life with no passion and they really want to change it. Many of the youngs are curious about what the new life would be after changing and they do want to have a try.
All in all, in my opinion, whether someone prefer to change or not may depends more on what the stage its life is staying in. Young people can have a change as they have the passion to face new life. Meanwhile, as people grow older, stable is essential for their lives.
告诉我个大致分数也行或者哪里还需要提高 谢谢啊！！！ 展开
楼主，你好。按照我的看法，你这篇雅思作文可以拿到5.5分。
我觉得还有一些方面需要提高：
语句的连贯性
连接词的使用与选择
文章观点的清晰阐述
我这里有一篇源自百度文库的7分的雅思作文高分范文http://wenku.baidu.com/view/44c3be1543323968011c925c.html，楼主可以参考一下：
Solving environmental problems should be responsibility of one international organization instead of state or national governments. Do you agree or disagree?
Environmental problem has been a wide public concern over the world. Some believe the solution of it should be put onto the duty of an international organization rather than any single government. I am also one of the supporters of this proposal.
One global institution ensures a better coordination of the world resources in tackling the environmental problems. Under the operation of one organization, the resources wasted when every government is making its own effort can be greatly reduced, which maximizes the benefits of the resources. Also, under its coordination among countries, the strengths of each country can be consolidated while the weaknesses can be avoided, enhancing the work efficiency
A specific international organization, from a global perspective, can be more effective in solving the problems of the environment. In this way, there is no need to worry about some countries taking part in while others not, and some countries are positive in performance while others negative, so that the cross influence can be decreased, and then the environmental problems can be solved at the international level. Besides, doing so helps to prevent some countries from shirking their responsibilities or just making their own benefits, and thus leave the problems to be fully dealt with.
Admittedly, it is still necessary for every national government to bear their duties and obligations. After all, this international organization is formed under the support of various governments and in need of their continual support in operation. However, this duty and obligation is undertaken under the coordination of the organization, rather than done by them alone.
To sum up, I do agree with the idea that a representative institution of countries over the world should take over the duty to solve environmental problems. With a clear understanding of this and continual support from every country, the world will turn from good to better.
average:4.5
从句语法错误，从句运用不恰当，有单词单复数问题，有拼写错误，指代不清晰，缺少连词。
有尝试使用复杂句，论点有扩展。
