Question

【国际贸易实务】的一道案例分析题:

Company A signed a sales contract with company B stipulating that the seller should present quality inspection certificates by SGS while the buyer retains the right to reinspect after the goods arriving at the port of destination. A shipped the goods on time and presented all documents. After examination by inspection authority X in the importing country, B found that the quality does not comply with the contract. Therefore, B stated that he would pay less for the whole goods but it was rejected by A. A hold the view that the inspection authority X is not authoritive enough, and didn't accept the inspection result. Q: Did A have the right to refuse the report and refuse to reduce the price? What should be done further to resolve the problem? What kind of lesson can we draw from the case? 请【私信】--百度私信“”我吧!!!

Answer 1

这主要是贸易法的问题。
一般来讲，合同里只有A与B达成的协议，所以只要不是不可抗力造成的，A没有达到要求都是他的错。
A委托X来帮他们做检查，这里不管X做得对与错，造成的后果对B的影响都得由A来承担。而X如果是真的失职或是怎样，那都只是A与X的事，B是不用去管的。
简单地讲，你和张三说好让他帮你买一套设备(出于生意)。张三觉得事情没问题，跑去让李四买回来，然后他送到你手里。结果拿到手上你发觉有问题，你觉得你可能去找李四么?
至于这个案例给人的教训可以总结为几点:
1、要懂法:这话话糙理不糙。既然双方是按合同办事，自然就得以合同法相关条款来处理事情。倘若这里B不懂我上面说的内容，那他就白白损失了，好不划算。
2、这是针对A来说的:当然A也得要懂法，本例中看出A要么是不懂法，要么是故意诡辩。但终究是他犯了错。其次是A要注意第三方介入的事项，你请入的第三方只对你们两家的协议负责，而不需要对其他任何人负责。因此这里把关的事情，还是你自己在做。
介入的第三方的资质、实力、经验等你都要自己去把握，否则造成以上局面，仍然是你自己的失职造成的，怪不了别人。