雅思作文分析和批改,不专业勿进~
这两张可能要比前面两张清楚点,作文题目是“Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair.(剑6T2大作文) 展开
1. 你是否清晰回答了题目中提出的问题?你给出的题目不全, 但是根据格式, 我猜是D&G类型的, 即要求你讨论双方观点, 并给出你自己的看法。在探讨双方观点的时候注重分析其合理或不合理的方面, 不要做传声筒(即描述和解释原观点), 自己的观点要绝对明确,是一边倒, 还是倾向于一方, 还是两方面都不同意, 还是两方面都只同意一部分。无论怎样, 个人观点一定要明确,D&G类型文章要求有单独的一段明确陈述个人观点,可以结合到结论段, 也可以没有结论段。
2. 每个主体段(分论点段)是否有明确的主题句?即topic sentence来概括本段要探讨的主要观点?
3. 每个主体段内部, 主题句之后, 是否有恰当拓展, 或者论证支持(比如举例论证)?
4.段落之间, 是否有明确的承上启下的连接手段(连接词)?段落内部各个句子之间是否有连接词来加强逻辑关系?
5. 最后一段, 无论是否写明是结论, 都要明确重申个人观点, 不能摸棱两可。
语言方面倒是其次, 就以上方面来看, 个人感觉本篇短文做的相当不够。
其实很简单,认真想想你到底同意哪一方观点, 或者倾向于哪一方, 或者两者都有一定道理。
然后想如何论证, 尤其是举例。
这些没想好就匆忙下笔, 写出来的东西就很难有说服力。
那你觉得能得多少分呢?
task response: covers most parts of the question, but some are not presented clearly or not supported with relevant evidence. 5.5
coherence & cohesion: uses some linking devices, but not often effective and clear. topic sentences are not presented either at the beginning or at the end of the supporting paragraphs, and this makes extra difficulties for understanding. More importantly, there is a lack of clear progression throughout the essay, so the conclusion part is rather ambiguous. 5
vocabulary and grammar: vocabulary is sufficient for expression but tends to be common and few uncommon collocations. Grammar structures are mostly correct, though few complex structures were attempted. 5.5
overall score: 5.5