Question

谁能帮我翻译下这段英文啊

exhibit 3.1 shows that there was a statistical discrepancy of $51.9 billion in 2004，representing omitted and misrecorded transactions. recordings of payments and receipts arising from international transactions are done at different times and places, possibly using different methods. As a result, these recordings, upon which the balance-of-payments statistics are constructed. are bound to be imperfect. while merchandise trade can be recorded with a certain degree of accuracy at the customs houses, provisions of invisible services like consulting can escape detection. Cross-border financial transactions, a bulk of which might have been conducted electronically, are far more difficult to keep track of. For this reason, the balance of payments always presents a “balancing” debit or credit as a statistical discrepancy. It is interesting to note that the sum of the balance on capital account and the statistical discrepancy is very close to the balance of current account in magnitude, -$665.9 billion, this suggests that financial transactions may be mainly responsible for the discrepancy. When we compute the cumulative balance of payments including he current account, and the statistical discrepancies, we obtain the so-called overall balance or official settlement balance. All the transactions comprising the overall balance take place autonomously for their own sake. The overall balance is significant because it indicates a country’s international payment gap that must be accommodated with the government’s official reserve transactions.
It is also indicative of the pressure that a country’s currency faces for depreciation or appreciation. If, for example, a country continuously realizes deficits on the overall balance, the country will eventually run out of reserve holdings and its currency may have to depreciate against foreign currencies. In 2004, the united states had a $2.8 billion deficit on the overall balance. This means that the U.S. had to make a net payment equal to that amount to the rest of the worls. If the United States had realized a surplus on the overall balance, the U.S. would have received a net payment from the rest of the world.

Answer 1

一楼是机器翻译的，我来人工翻译吧。
3月1日的展览显示：2004年有$51.9 百万美元的统计差异，声称是忽略及记录错误事件。付款和收款所产生的国际交易都是在不同的时间和地点，可能采用不同的记录方法。因此导致的结果是，由这些记录基础上制成的国际收支统计也必然是不完善的。虽然商品交易可以准确记录发生在顾客房屋内的商品交易，但是向咨询服务这样的无形交易却很难被发现。跨境金融交易，大量可能进行了电子交易，远远更加难以追查。出于这个原因，国际收支始终扮演了一个“平衡”借记方或者或贷款方的统计差异。有趣的是注意到的总和平衡资本账户和统计差异是非常接近的平衡经常帐户的规模， -六千六百五十九万点〇万美元，这表明，金融交易应该为这些差别负责。

（没空了。以后再翻译）

Answer 2

3.1展览显示，有统计差异五百十九点零零亿美元在2004年，相当于省略和misrecorded交易。录制的付款和收款所产生的国际交易都是在不同的时间和地点，可能采用不同的方法。因此，这些录音，在此基础上的国际收支统计的建造。必然是不完善的。商品贸易的同时可以记录了某种程度的准确性在海关规定，无形的服务，如咨询能够逃脱检测。跨境金融交易，大量的可能进行了电子，远远更加难以掌握。出于这个原因，国际收支始终提出了一个“平衡”借记卡或信用卡的统计差异。有趣的是注意到的总和平衡资本账户和统计差异是非常接近的平衡经常帐户的规模， -六千六百五十九万点〇万美元，这表明，金融交易可能是主要负责差别。当我们计算的累计收支，包括他目前的帐户，并统计差异，我们得到所谓的整体平衡或官方解决的平衡。所有交易组成的整体平衡进行自主为自己的利益。总体平衡很重要，因为它表明一个国家的国际收支的差距，必须照顾到与政府的官方储备交易。
它也表明了压力，一个国家的货币面临贬值或升值。举例来说，如果一个国家财政赤字不断认识上的总体平衡，国家最终将耗尽外汇储备和货币可能贬值对外国货币。 2004年，美国有一项28亿美元赤字的总体平衡。这意味着，美国不得不作出的净支付相当于该数额的其他worls 。如果美国实现了盈余的总体平衡，美国将已收到的净支付由世界其他地方的