Question

《康德的法律与司法 》中的一段话，那位大哥大姐帮翻一下！！小弟感激涕！不要翻译软件翻译的！

Kant presents private right through an analysis of the categories of Property, Contract, and Status, which form the backbone of all Western legal systems. He introduces them as corresponding to the Categories of Substance, Causality, and Mutual Determination from the Critique of Pure Reason. They provide an exhaustive specification of the possible types of interaction consistent with freedom. Property concerns rights to things; contract rights against persons, and status contains rights to persons "akin to" rights to things.13 Kant remarks that the person/thing dichotomy makes room for only these possibilities. The intuitive idea is that free persons can only interact in three basic ways. They can interact independently, each pursuing his or her separate purposes. This is the structure of innate right. Property has a corresponding structure, because as a proprietor, what is mine is subject to my purposes and nobody else's. I can be wronged with respect to property in the same two ways that I can be wronged with respect to my person: by having my property used on behalf of another, or by being prevented from using my property on my own behalf. I have both possession and use of my property. If you use my house without my permission, you use it on your behalf, not mine; if you damage it, you prevent me from using it on my own behalf. Contract covers the case in which parties interact interdependently andconsensually. If I invite you into my home, you do not wrong me; if I agree to do something for you, my powers to do so are now at your disposal, and you are entitled to use them as specified in our agreement. If I fail to do what I have agreed to do, I wrong you, by depriving you of means that you were entitled to.
这几句话很难译码？就几句呀，谁能帮我把他翻译完全！！谢谢呀

Answer 1

Kant presents private right through an analysis of the categories of Property, Contract, and Status, which form the backbone of all Western legal systems. He introduces them as corresponding to the Categories of Substance, Causality, and Mutual Determination from the Critique of Pure Reason. They provide an exhaustive specification of the possible types of interaction consistent with freedom. Property concerns rights to things; contract rights against persons, and status contains rights to persons "akin to" rights to things.
通过分析作为西方法律体系支柱的‘所有权’、‘合同’及‘地位’的范畴，康德对私人权利的诠释，提出了他的建议。他指出这些是与‘纯粹理性批判’的‘物体’、‘因果’及‘相互决定’范畴相对应的，它们提供了相互作用的可能类型，与‘自由’一致的的详尽规定。‘所有权’涉及事物的权利，‘合同’权针对人，而‘地位’则包含人的权利‘类似于’对事物的权利。

13 Kant remarks that the person/thing dichotomy makes room for only these possibilities.The intuitive idea is that free persons can only interact in three basic ways. They can interact independently, each pursuing his or her separate purposes. This is the structure of innate right. Property has a corresponding structure, because as a proprietor, what is mine is subject to my purposes and nobody else's. I can be wronged with respect to property in the same two ways that I can be wronged with respect to my person: by having my property used on behalf of another, or by being prevented from using my property on my own behalf. I have both possession and use of my property. If you use my house without my permission, you use it on your behalf, not mine; if you damage it, you prevent me from using it on my own behalf.
康德评论说人或事物的两歧分支导致只有这些可能性的存在。直觉的观念是自由的人只能以三种基本方式交流。他们可以自主互动，每个人追求他个别的目标；这是与生俱来的权利结构。‘所有权’也有个相对应的结构，因为作为所有者，属于我的事物应由我支配而不是他人。另一个人使用我的所有权，或者我被阻止使用我的所有权，这两种方式都侵犯了我的所有权和人权。如果未经允许，你擅自住进我的房子，你是为了自己使用而不是为了我；如果房子受损坏，你阻止了我为自己的使用。

Contract covers the case in which parties interact interdependently and consensually. If I invite you into my home, you do not wrong me; if I agree to do something for you, my powers to do so are now at your disposal, and you are entitled to use them as specified in our agreement. If I fail to do what I have agreed to do, I wrong you, by depriving you of means that you were entitled to.
‘合同’涵盖双方的相互依赖和两愿交感的互动。如果我邀请你来我家，你没有违反我的意愿；如果我同意为你办事， 我的能力便受你支配，你有权根据协议的规定来使用它。如果我没有按协议为你办事，剥夺了你有权使用的工具，那就是我侵犯你的权利。

Answer 2

Kant presents private right through an analysis of the categories of Property, Contract, and Status, which form the backbone of all Western legal systems.
康德通过对所有权，合同，地位的分析阐释了个人权利的定义，这也为西方法律系统奠定了基石。

He introduces them as corresponding to the Categories of Substance, Causality, and Mutual Determination from the Critique of Pure Reason. They provide an exhaustive specification of the possible types of interaction consistent with freedom.
他对照物质、偶然性和相互作用的范畴从纯理性的批判角度来介绍所有权，合同和地位。因为这些和自由一样提供了尽可能多的相互作用的分类。

Property concerns rights to things; contract rights against persons, and status contains rights to persons "akin to" rights to things.
所有权包括对事物的权利，合同包含对人的权利，地位包含和对人对事物权利相似的权利

Kant remarks that the person/thing dichotomy makes room for only these possibilities.The intuitive idea is that free persons can only interact in three basic ways. They can interact independently, each pursuing his or her separate purposes. This is the structure of innate right. Property has a corresponding structure, because as a proprietor, what is mine is subject to my purposes and nobody else's.
康德表明这些人或事物的二分性为这些可能性的发生创造了条件。本能意识即自由人能够以三种基本方式交流，他们表现得独立，每个人都追寻各自的目的。这是本能权利的结构。所有权有一个相对应的结构，因为作为所有者，我的东西就要听从我的安排，而不能听从任何别人的。

中间的没有翻译，抱歉啦。。。

I have both possession and use of my property. If you use my house without my permission, you use it on your behalf, not mine; if you damage it, you prevent me from using it on my own behalf.
我有事物的所有权和使用权，如果你未经我的允许擅自使用我的房子，你只是代表尼在用，而不能表明是我的。如果你毁坏了他，你只是阻止了我使用属于我自己的那部分。