高分求高手帮我翻译! 一定要精准!(1) 200
尼采曾经说：“我无法接受这个世界上有上帝，因为如果有，我无法接受自己不是上帝。”引了这句话作为开头是因为我想为自己辩解一下。“倘若真有上帝”这个题目似乎是在明明白白地揭示...
尼采曾经说：“我无法接受这个世界上有上帝，因为如果有，我无法接受自己不是上帝。”引了这句话作为开头是因为我想为自己辩解一下。“倘若真有上帝”这个题目似乎是在明明白白地揭示着我是个无神论者，而实际上，我并不确定这一点。那么，看，连骄傲的尼采都无法接受“上帝存在”这一说，所以，本篇的这个题目就更不是表示对佛教徒基督教徒伊斯兰教徒的不屑，而是在提出一个问题——
倘若真有上帝，谁需要他？他又能够在人间做些什么？
先从不可能开始吧。把一切不可能都排除了，最后剩下的即使再不可能，也是真相。
政治家和银行家应该是最不可能需要他的两类人了。政治家不需要上帝，因为他们觉得自己的力量足以拯救这个世界，或者说，是通过自己的野心改变一个国家，然后再改变世界。美国大选中奥巴马在民主党代表大会上的演讲中说了这么一句话：在这个世界上我们有真正的敌人，我们必须找到这些敌人，必须追击并打败他们。是的，美国有敌人。所有反对美国的都是这个崇尚自由民主人类生而平等的国家的敌人。政治家让战争变成理所应当的行为。当被他们的激情演说俘虏的士兵在战场上奋勇杀“敌”时，我确信，绝大部分人并没有想过这一点，那就是他们在刀光剑影中获得的胜利，实际上是“战争”这一金字塔的最高一层。而构建这座塔的底部，是武器，是被践踏的良知，是和他们同属一种生灵的涂炭。光是这一点，政治家的主张和[存在或者不存在的]上帝便可算得上是背道而驰，你让政治家如何需要他？上帝手无寸铁，面对人类运用各种高精尖武器进行的自相残杀，估计也只落得个摇头叹息的份儿，再谈到让他做些什么，不是强人所难了？
麻烦别用翻译器成么。。。 展开
倘若真有上帝，谁需要他？他又能够在人间做些什么？
先从不可能开始吧。把一切不可能都排除了，最后剩下的即使再不可能，也是真相。
政治家和银行家应该是最不可能需要他的两类人了。政治家不需要上帝，因为他们觉得自己的力量足以拯救这个世界，或者说，是通过自己的野心改变一个国家，然后再改变世界。美国大选中奥巴马在民主党代表大会上的演讲中说了这么一句话：在这个世界上我们有真正的敌人，我们必须找到这些敌人，必须追击并打败他们。是的，美国有敌人。所有反对美国的都是这个崇尚自由民主人类生而平等的国家的敌人。政治家让战争变成理所应当的行为。当被他们的激情演说俘虏的士兵在战场上奋勇杀“敌”时，我确信，绝大部分人并没有想过这一点，那就是他们在刀光剑影中获得的胜利，实际上是“战争”这一金字塔的最高一层。而构建这座塔的底部，是武器，是被践踏的良知，是和他们同属一种生灵的涂炭。光是这一点，政治家的主张和[存在或者不存在的]上帝便可算得上是背道而驰，你让政治家如何需要他？上帝手无寸铁，面对人类运用各种高精尖武器进行的自相残杀，估计也只落得个摇头叹息的份儿，再谈到让他做些什么，不是强人所难了？
麻烦别用翻译器成么。。。 展开
7个回答
展开全部
Nietzsche once said: "I can not accept in this world there is God, because if there is, I can not accept that they are not God." Cited as the beginning of this sentence because I want to look for their own defense. "If there is God" in the subject seems to be clearly revealed an atheist I am, in fact, I am not sure. Well, look, and even proud of Nietzsche could not accept "the existence of God," said So, this is not a subject that is even more of a Buddhist Christians Muslims disdain, but a question --
If there is God, who needs him? He can do what on earth?
You can not start from the beginning. Can not have all ruled out, even if the last remaining can not, the truth is.
Politicians and bankers should be the least likely to need his two types of people. Politicians do not need God because they feel their own strength enough to save the world, or, by its own ambitions to change a country, and then to change the world. Obama in the U.S. presidential election in the Democratic Congress of the speech so that the sentence: In this world we have real enemies, we must find the enemy and must be pursued and defeated them. Yes, there is an enemy of the United States. All are opposed to the United States as a place that champions democracy and human beings are born free and equal enemies of the country. Let politicians into the war deserved. When they speak of passion captured soldiers courageously on the battlefield to kill "the enemy", I am convinced that the vast majority of people do not have thought about this, it is that they continued to battle each other to gain the victory, is actually a "war" A top layer of the pyramid. Construction of the tower and the bottom is a weapon is being trampled upon the conscience, and they are the same kind of people being trampled. This alone, politicians and advocates of [the existence or non-existent] God can be regarded as a run, you need to let politicians how he? God defenseless in the face of human use of a variety of sophisticated weapons to fight against each other, it is estimated that only end up shaking his head and sigh in envy, and then he talked about what to do, rather than coercing others to do it?
你可以找网上的在线翻译
If there is God, who needs him? He can do what on earth?
You can not start from the beginning. Can not have all ruled out, even if the last remaining can not, the truth is.
Politicians and bankers should be the least likely to need his two types of people. Politicians do not need God because they feel their own strength enough to save the world, or, by its own ambitions to change a country, and then to change the world. Obama in the U.S. presidential election in the Democratic Congress of the speech so that the sentence: In this world we have real enemies, we must find the enemy and must be pursued and defeated them. Yes, there is an enemy of the United States. All are opposed to the United States as a place that champions democracy and human beings are born free and equal enemies of the country. Let politicians into the war deserved. When they speak of passion captured soldiers courageously on the battlefield to kill "the enemy", I am convinced that the vast majority of people do not have thought about this, it is that they continued to battle each other to gain the victory, is actually a "war" A top layer of the pyramid. Construction of the tower and the bottom is a weapon is being trampled upon the conscience, and they are the same kind of people being trampled. This alone, politicians and advocates of [the existence or non-existent] God can be regarded as a run, you need to let politicians how he? God defenseless in the face of human use of a variety of sophisticated weapons to fight against each other, it is estimated that only end up shaking his head and sigh in envy, and then he talked about what to do, rather than coercing others to do it?
你可以找网上的在线翻译
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
展开全部
高分求高手帮我翻译! 一定要精准!(1)
悬赏分：200 - 离问题结束还有 19 天 20 小时
尼采曾经说：“我无法接受这个世界上有上帝，因为如果有，我无法接受自己不是上帝。”引了这句话作为开头是因为我想为自己辩解一下。“倘若真有上帝”这个题目似乎是在明明白白地揭示着我是个无神论者，而实际上，我并不确定这一点。那么，看，连骄傲的尼采都无法接受“上帝存在”这一说，所以，本篇的这个题目就更不是表示对佛教徒基督教徒伊斯兰教徒的不屑，而是在提出一个问题——
倘若真有上帝，谁需要他？他又能够在人间做些什么？
先从不可能开始吧。把一切不可能都排除了，最后剩下的即使再不可能，也是真相。
政治家和银行家应该是最不可能需要他的两类人了。政治家不需要上帝，因为他们觉得自己的力量足以拯救这个世界，或者说，是通过自己的野心改变一个国家，然后再改变世界。美国大选中奥巴马在民主党代表大会上的演讲中说了这么一句话：在这个世界上我们有真正的敌人，我们必须找到这些敌人，必须追击并打败他们。是的，美国有敌人。所有反对美国的都是这个崇尚自由民主人类生而平等的国家的敌人。政治家让战争变成理所应当的行为。当被他们的激情演说俘虏的士兵在战场上奋勇杀“敌”时，我确信，绝大部分人并没有想过这一点，那就是他们在刀光剑影中获得的胜利，实际上是“战争”这一金字塔的最高一层。而构建这座塔的底部，是武器，是被践踏的良知，是和他们同属一种生灵的涂炭。光是这一点，政治家的主张和[存在或者不存在的]上帝便可算得上是背道而驰，你让政治家如何需要他？上帝手无寸铁，面对人类运用各种高精尖武器进行的自相残杀，估计也只落得个摇头叹息的份儿，再谈到让他做些什么，不是强人所难了？
悬赏分：200 - 离问题结束还有 19 天 20 小时
尼采曾经说：“我无法接受这个世界上有上帝，因为如果有，我无法接受自己不是上帝。”引了这句话作为开头是因为我想为自己辩解一下。“倘若真有上帝”这个题目似乎是在明明白白地揭示着我是个无神论者，而实际上，我并不确定这一点。那么，看，连骄傲的尼采都无法接受“上帝存在”这一说，所以，本篇的这个题目就更不是表示对佛教徒基督教徒伊斯兰教徒的不屑，而是在提出一个问题——
倘若真有上帝，谁需要他？他又能够在人间做些什么？
先从不可能开始吧。把一切不可能都排除了，最后剩下的即使再不可能，也是真相。
政治家和银行家应该是最不可能需要他的两类人了。政治家不需要上帝，因为他们觉得自己的力量足以拯救这个世界，或者说，是通过自己的野心改变一个国家，然后再改变世界。美国大选中奥巴马在民主党代表大会上的演讲中说了这么一句话：在这个世界上我们有真正的敌人，我们必须找到这些敌人，必须追击并打败他们。是的，美国有敌人。所有反对美国的都是这个崇尚自由民主人类生而平等的国家的敌人。政治家让战争变成理所应当的行为。当被他们的激情演说俘虏的士兵在战场上奋勇杀“敌”时，我确信，绝大部分人并没有想过这一点，那就是他们在刀光剑影中获得的胜利，实际上是“战争”这一金字塔的最高一层。而构建这座塔的底部，是武器，是被践踏的良知，是和他们同属一种生灵的涂炭。光是这一点，政治家的主张和[存在或者不存在的]上帝便可算得上是背道而驰，你让政治家如何需要他？上帝手无寸铁，面对人类运用各种高精尖武器进行的自相残杀，估计也只落得个摇头叹息的份儿，再谈到让他做些什么，不是强人所难了？
本回答被网友采纳
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
展开全部
Nietzsche once said: "I can not accept in this world there is God, because if there is, I can not accept that they are not God." Cited as the beginning of this sentence because I want to look for their own defense. "If there is God" in the subject seems to be clearly revealed an atheist I am, in fact, I am not sure. Well, look, and even proud of Nietzsche could not accept "the existence of God," said So, this is not a subject that is even more of a Buddhist Christians Muslims disdain, but a question --
If there is God, who needs him? He can do what on earth?
You can not start from the beginning. Can not have all ruled out, even if the last remaining can not, the truth is.
Politicians and bankers should be the least likely to need his two types of people. Politicians do not need God because they feel their own strength enough to save the world, or, by its own ambitions to change a country, and then to change the world. Obama in the U.S. presidential election in the Democratic Congress of the speech so that the sentence: In this world we have real enemies, we must find the enemy and must be pursued and defeated them. Yes, there is an enemy of the United States. All are opposed to the United States as a place that champions democracy and human beings are born free and equal enemies of the country. Let politicians into the war deserved. When they speak of passion captured soldiers courageously on the battlefield to kill "the enemy", I am convinced that the vast majority of people do not have thought about this, it is that they continued to battle each other to gain the victory, is actually a "war" A top layer of the pyramid. Construction of the tower and the bottom is a weapon is being trampled upon the conscience, and they are the same kind of people being trampled. This alone, politicians and advocates of [the existence or non-existent] God can be regarded as a run, you need to let politicians how he? God defenseless in the face of human use of a variety of sophisticated weapons to fight against each other, it is estimated that only end up shaking his head and sigh in envy, and then he talked about what to do, rather than coercing others to do it?
If there is God, who needs him? He can do what on earth?
You can not start from the beginning. Can not have all ruled out, even if the last remaining can not, the truth is.
Politicians and bankers should be the least likely to need his two types of people. Politicians do not need God because they feel their own strength enough to save the world, or, by its own ambitions to change a country, and then to change the world. Obama in the U.S. presidential election in the Democratic Congress of the speech so that the sentence: In this world we have real enemies, we must find the enemy and must be pursued and defeated them. Yes, there is an enemy of the United States. All are opposed to the United States as a place that champions democracy and human beings are born free and equal enemies of the country. Let politicians into the war deserved. When they speak of passion captured soldiers courageously on the battlefield to kill "the enemy", I am convinced that the vast majority of people do not have thought about this, it is that they continued to battle each other to gain the victory, is actually a "war" A top layer of the pyramid. Construction of the tower and the bottom is a weapon is being trampled upon the conscience, and they are the same kind of people being trampled. This alone, politicians and advocates of [the existence or non-existent] God can be regarded as a run, you need to let politicians how he? God defenseless in the face of human use of a variety of sophisticated weapons to fight against each other, it is estimated that only end up shaking his head and sigh in envy, and then he talked about what to do, rather than coercing others to do it?
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
展开全部
Nietzsche once said: "I can not accept in this world there is God, because if there is, I can not accept that they are not God." Cited as the beginning of this sentence because I want to look for their own defense. "If there is God" in the subject seems to be clearly revealed an atheist I am, in fact, I am not sure. Well, look, and even proud of Nietzsche could not accept "the existence of God," said So, this is not a subject that is even more of a Buddhist Christians Muslims disdain, but a question --
If there is God, who needs him? In the world can he do?
You can not start from the beginning. Can not have all ruled out, even if the last remaining can not, the truth is.
Politicians and bankers should be the least likely to need his two types of people. Politicians do not need God because they feel their own strength enough to save the world, or, by its own ambitions to change a country, and then to change the world. Obama in the U.S. presidential election in the Democratic Congress of the speech so that the sentence: In this world we have real enemies, we must find the enemy and must be pursued and defeated them. Yes, there is an enemy of the United States. All are opposed to the United States as a place that champions democracy and human beings are born free and equal enemies of the country. Let politicians into the war deserved. When they speak of passion captured soldiers courageously on the battlefield to kill "the enemy", I am convinced that the vast majority of people do not have thought about this, it is that they continued to battle each other to gain the victory, is actually a "war" A top layer of the pyramid. Construction of the tower and the bottom is a weapon is being trampled upon the conscience, and they are the same kind of people being trampled. This alone, politicians and advocates of [the existence or non-existent] God can be regarded as a run, you need to let politicians how he? God defenseless in the face of human use of a variety of sophisticated weapons to carry out the self - Killing, it is estimated that only end up shaking his head and sigh in envy, and then he talked about what to do, rather than coercing others to do it?
如果不知道可以下载金山词霸
If there is God, who needs him? In the world can he do?
You can not start from the beginning. Can not have all ruled out, even if the last remaining can not, the truth is.
Politicians and bankers should be the least likely to need his two types of people. Politicians do not need God because they feel their own strength enough to save the world, or, by its own ambitions to change a country, and then to change the world. Obama in the U.S. presidential election in the Democratic Congress of the speech so that the sentence: In this world we have real enemies, we must find the enemy and must be pursued and defeated them. Yes, there is an enemy of the United States. All are opposed to the United States as a place that champions democracy and human beings are born free and equal enemies of the country. Let politicians into the war deserved. When they speak of passion captured soldiers courageously on the battlefield to kill "the enemy", I am convinced that the vast majority of people do not have thought about this, it is that they continued to battle each other to gain the victory, is actually a "war" A top layer of the pyramid. Construction of the tower and the bottom is a weapon is being trampled upon the conscience, and they are the same kind of people being trampled. This alone, politicians and advocates of [the existence or non-existent] God can be regarded as a run, you need to let politicians how he? God defenseless in the face of human use of a variety of sophisticated weapons to carry out the self - Killing, it is estimated that only end up shaking his head and sigh in envy, and then he talked about what to do, rather than coercing others to do it?
如果不知道可以下载金山词霸
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
展开全部
Nietzsche once said: "I can not accept in this world there is God, because if there is, I can not accept that they are not God." Cited as the beginning of this sentence because I want to look for their own defense. "If there is God" in the subject seems to be clearly revealed an atheist I am, in fact, I am not sure. Well, look, and even proud of Nietzsche could not accept "the existence of God," said So, this is not a subject that is even more of a Buddhist Christians Muslims disdain, but a question --
If there is God, who needs him? He can do what on earth?
You can not start from the beginning. Can not have all ruled out, even if the last remaining can not, the truth is.
Politicians and bankers should be the least likely to need his two types of people. Politicians do not need God because they feel their own strength enough to save the world, or, by its own ambitions to change a country, and then to change the world. Obama in the U.S. presidential election in the Democratic Congress of the speech so that the sentence: In this world we have real enemies, we must find the enemy and must be pursued and defeated them. Yes, there is an enemy of the United States. All are opposed to the United States as a place that champions democracy and human beings are born free and equal enemies of the country. Let politicians into the war deserved. When they speak of passion captured soldiers courageously on the battlefield to kill "the enemy", I am convinced that the vast majority of people do not have thought about this, it is that they continued to battle each other to gain the victory, is actually a "war" A top layer of the pyramid. Construction of the tower and the bottom is a weapon is being trampled upon the conscience, and they are the same kind of people being trampled. This alone, politicians and advocates of [the existence or non-existent] God can be regarded as a run, you need to let politicians how he? God defenseless in the face of human use of a variety of sophisticated weapons to fight against each other, it is estimated that only end up shaking his head and sigh in envy, and then he talked about what to do, rather than coercing others to do it?
中文 > 英语 互换翻译
If there is God, who needs him? He can do what on earth?
You can not start from the beginning. Can not have all ruled out, even if the last remaining can not, the truth is.
Politicians and bankers should be the least likely to need his two types of people. Politicians do not need God because they feel their own strength enough to save the world, or, by its own ambitions to change a country, and then to change the world. Obama in the U.S. presidential election in the Democratic Congress of the speech so that the sentence: In this world we have real enemies, we must find the enemy and must be pursued and defeated them. Yes, there is an enemy of the United States. All are opposed to the United States as a place that champions democracy and human beings are born free and equal enemies of the country. Let politicians into the war deserved. When they speak of passion captured soldiers courageously on the battlefield to kill "the enemy", I am convinced that the vast majority of people do not have thought about this, it is that they continued to battle each other to gain the victory, is actually a "war" A top layer of the pyramid. Construction of the tower and the bottom is a weapon is being trampled upon the conscience, and they are the same kind of people being trampled. This alone, politicians and advocates of [the existence or non-existent] God can be regarded as a run, you need to let politicians how he? God defenseless in the face of human use of a variety of sophisticated weapons to fight against each other, it is estimated that only end up shaking his head and sigh in envy, and then he talked about what to do, rather than coercing others to do it?
中文 > 英语 互换翻译
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是？
更多回答（5）
推荐律师服务：
若未解决您的问题，请您详细描述您的问题，通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询
