1个回答
展开全部
At first glance the film when in fact nothing of interest, the dictatorship of the film also has a lot of reading, is nothing but talk about how the rule of a monarch of how good, how Hengzhengbaolian how, and so on, but did not expect was to see later There continue to urge them are listed, as this film does much more than others in different places.
A young Scottish doctor Gary Kong, because condolences to participate in medical mission arrived in Uganda and are subject to the then military dictator Amin of Uganda's appreciation, he also left behind when the Queen's physician. Self-proclaimed "The Last King of Scotland", Amin, Gary Kong as their favorite son like him ... enjoy high position and great wealth, which makes Gary feel flattered Kong. Gary Young Kong is a result of worship Amin, and even made him all the atrocities, take it for granted. For everywhere, and strong destructive and sophisticated weapons, have turned a blind eye to Gary Kong; even see Amin against the dissidents were horrible massacre, he also ignored. Until one day when he found himself being classified as Amin's henchmen, he was suddenly aware of their abhorrent side.
First, the film's narrative point of view. The film is not the same as with other films, it is not directly reflect the description of a tyrant to his cruel, but to a third party's point of view, a third party in order to experience a contrast to General Amin's vicious. Some people may think that this movie lacks great meaning, politics put unclear, in particular, some understanding of the historical background, the story is too easy way out, placed a tyrant, "General Amin," the astonishing political, not an alarming incident But Nongmochongcai performance to a white man of Africa's political adventure, the two three bizarre extra-marital affairs with the surging passion of the sensational repeatedly rubbing the lens was actually a desecration of the truth of history, of contempt for the people of Africa ... ... the view, Of course, not surprisingly, worthy of respect, but as far as I am concerned, the story of the British way, is about people and nature as the key link, a careless trip to the muddy water of the soul of young people from the ups and downs for clues to the story together, this is The new film is located. The subject matter of course, numerous types of law making, can be very political, very bloody, very calm, very documentary, the very ideology ... but ... the world of mainstream film aesthetic trends, the current is also a matter of fact it is two words: popular. A user-friendly and fully expressed their wish to express my understanding of the film is the most successful.
Second, this film will portray the character of two very profound, regardless of whether the film is true, are very credible, after the actors perform well, is more of a menace. Inside the main character Dr. Gary Young Kong is a very impulsive and very naive young man, after graduating from the various actions, such as after-school presumptuous of water, their eyes closed were the future of the globe to come to a decision, he can be seen The idea is still very impulsive and very bold, and the lack of rational thinking that finally led to his blind worship, and when he met Amin when he was actually kind of nice appearance and the language of gains, and He highlighted the naive character, in the end his fate is a matter of course. As Amin's personality, not to mention, Xiaolicangdao, Ayutthaya is a deep, but when he tells his own childhood, we found that, in fact, he is a poor man who had experienced We have not experienced If we follow his childhood experiences, I think most of us may choose to degenerate it! He stood there and the highest point, despite his brutal rule, but in the end is also a kind of extreme methods of rule, although he did was inhumane, but I still have to admire that he does have such a leadership, when He Gary Kong sanctions, he had tears falling down, we can see that he is not a callous person. He and everyone from the exchange point of view, his Ayutthaya especially profound in his Gary Kong exchange, will soon be able to win public support, so that there is no doubt that Gary Kong's allegiance to his own, although not its own He said then, however, this ability is very admirable.
Of course, a good script coupled with good character of a good film is far from sufficient, in which the main body of the actor's performance I think is the biggest film success. Among the leading man to become a best actor Academy Award winner Forest Intervet Hackett is really well-deserved. "The Last King of Scotland" at the end, the director placed a picture of the reality of Amin, his air of action, after I have read more forest sigh Intervet Hackett's performance has been superb, and his performances so I think he is Amin, Not only because it is the same black, also has a stout body, even his eyes each and every trick, even temperament and are similar. Among the other actors, despite not the best actor Academy Award-winning, but their superb acting is not in doubt is precisely because of these fine actors, only so much to win the support of the film's audience.
Finally, the film's narrative rhythm there is also a degree of relaxation. Foster in "Aspects of the novel", had "rhythm" as a novel to be an important aspect of the study, saying that "the pace handles the issue well on hate most, it will be rigid as a symbol, not to lead us forward, Instead, we will stumble, "The same can be applied to the film and on. The whole rhythm of the film compact, Diedang ups and downs, thrilling. At the end of the film are generally sensational climax, and other films of the same subject matter compared to "The Last King of Scotland" fan in place more to do and more accurate. • director Kevin Macdonald should get this year's best director award.
And the history of film of the same type of comparison, I think this film is more human, more educational significance, gives the impression of a more profound. Is not only cruel but also because the film a few scenes of violence, because the film is more unique narrative perspective, as well as the excellent actor. As a result, I am very satisfied with the film.
初看这部电影的时候其实是没什么兴趣的,对于独裁的片子也看了也不少了,无非就是讲一个君主的统治怎么怎么不好,怎么怎么横征暴敛等等,但看到后来没想到居然有继续看下去的冲动,因为这部片子确有跟别的不同的地方。
一个苏格兰的青年医师盖瑞岗,因为参加医疗慰问团而来到乌干达,不但受到当时乌干达的军事独裁者阿敏的赏识,还被留下来当他的御用医师。自诩为“末代独裁”的阿敏,把盖瑞岗当作是自己儿子般地宠爱,让他享尽荣华富贵…,这使盖瑞岗感到受宠若惊。年轻的盖瑞岗于是非常崇拜阿敏,甚至将他所做的一切暴行,都视之为理所当然。对于随处可见、毁灭性强的先进武器,盖瑞岗都视若无睹;就算看到反对阿敏的异议份子惨遭可怕的屠杀,他也不闻不问。直到有一天,当他发现自己被大家归为阿敏的党羽时,他才猛然觉悟到自己令人憎恶的一面。
首先是这部片子的叙述角度。这部片子跟别的片子不一样,它并不是直接通过描写暴君来体现他的残忍的,而是以一个第三者的角度,以一个第三者的经历来反衬出将军阿敏的狠毒。有些人可能觉得这电影没啥大意思,讲政治讲得不清不楚,尤其了解点儿历史背景的,更是嫌故事避重就轻,放着暴君“阿敏将军”的惊人政治、惊人事件不表,却浓墨重彩地表现一个白人小伙子的非洲政治历险,更把三两段奇形怪状的婚外情用激情澎湃的煽情镜头反复揉搓,简直就是对历史真相的亵渎,对非洲人民的蔑视……这样的观点出现,当然不奇怪,值得尊重,但就我而言,英国人的故事手法,以人为本,以性为纲,以一个不小心趟了浑水的年轻人的灵魂跌宕起伏的起承转合为故事线索,正是这部电影的新意所在。这个题材当然还有无数种拍法,可以非常政治、非常血腥、非常冷静、非常纪实、非常意识形态……但世界电影的主流审美趋向,目前来讲其实还就是那两个字:通俗。一个通俗易懂,并且能完全表达出自己想表达的片子我认识就是最成功的。
其次这部片子将两人的性格刻画的十分深刻,不管这部片子是否确有其事,都是十分可信的,经过演员们的精心表演,更加的是如虎添翼。里面主人公青年医师盖瑞岗是一个十分冲动并且又十分天真的年轻人,从他毕业后的种种举动,比如下课后的放肆戏水,对自己的未来居然闭着眼睛转地球仪来决定,可见他的思想还是很冲动的,很冒失的,缺乏理智的思考,以至于最后导致他的盲目崇拜,而当他遇到阿敏的时候居然又被他那慈祥的外表和和蔼的语言所蒙蔽,又突出了他天真的性格,因此,到最后他的下场也是理所当然的。至于阿敏的性格就更不用说了,笑里藏刀,是一个城府很深的人,但当他讲述自己童年的时候,我们才发现,其实他又是个可怜的人,他所经历的我们并没有经历过的,如果我们跟他一样童年的遭遇的话,我想也许我们大部分人会选择堕落吧!而他确站在最高点,他的统治尽管残酷,但终究也是一种偏激的统治方法,虽然他的做法是很不人道的,但我仍然不得不钦佩他这样一个确实有领导能力的人,当他对盖瑞岗进行制裁的时候,他掉下了眼泪,可见,他也并不是一个麻木不仁的人。从他与每个人的交流上来看,他的城府尤为深刻,在他对盖瑞岗进行交流的时候,很快便能收买人心,让盖瑞岗毫无置疑的去效忠自己,尽管自己并不是他自己说的那么好,不过,这种能力还是很令人佩服的。
当然,一个好的剧本加上好的人物性格对一部好片子是远远不够的,其中的主体,演员的表演我觉得才是影片最大的成功之处。当中的男主角能成为奥斯卡最佳男演员奖的得主福里斯特威克特真的是当之无愧。《末代独裁》的结尾,导演安插了现实的阿敏的画面,他的神态动作,我看过之后更加感叹福里斯特威克特的表演精湛了,他的表演让我觉得他就是阿敏,不仅是因为同是黑人,同样具有肥硕的身躯,就连他的每个眼神,每个小动作,甚至是气质都是及其相似的。其中的其他演员尽管没有获得奥斯卡最佳男演员的殊荣,但他们的精湛演技是毋庸置疑的,正是有了这些优秀的演员,才赢得了这么多支持这部片子的观众。
最后,这部片子的叙事节奏也是张弛有度的。 福斯特在《小说面面观》中,曾把“节奏”作为小说的一个重要方面加以考察,认为“节奏处理得不好就最使人讨厌,它会僵化为一种象征,不是带领我们前进,反而会把我们绊倒“,同样的道理也可以应用与电影上。整部片子节奏紧凑,跌荡起伏、扣人心弦。片子结尾一般都是煽情的高潮,和其他同样题材的片子相比较,《末代独裁》煽得更到位,拿捏更准。导演凯文•麦克唐纳才应该得今年的最佳导演奖。
与同类型的历史片相比较,我觉得此片更有了人性,更有了教育的意义,给人的印象更加的深刻。不仅仅是因为片中几处残忍而且暴力的镜头,更多的是因为本片独具特色的叙述视角,以及优秀的演员。因此,我对这部电影十分的满意。
A young Scottish doctor Gary Kong, because condolences to participate in medical mission arrived in Uganda and are subject to the then military dictator Amin of Uganda's appreciation, he also left behind when the Queen's physician. Self-proclaimed "The Last King of Scotland", Amin, Gary Kong as their favorite son like him ... enjoy high position and great wealth, which makes Gary feel flattered Kong. Gary Young Kong is a result of worship Amin, and even made him all the atrocities, take it for granted. For everywhere, and strong destructive and sophisticated weapons, have turned a blind eye to Gary Kong; even see Amin against the dissidents were horrible massacre, he also ignored. Until one day when he found himself being classified as Amin's henchmen, he was suddenly aware of their abhorrent side.
First, the film's narrative point of view. The film is not the same as with other films, it is not directly reflect the description of a tyrant to his cruel, but to a third party's point of view, a third party in order to experience a contrast to General Amin's vicious. Some people may think that this movie lacks great meaning, politics put unclear, in particular, some understanding of the historical background, the story is too easy way out, placed a tyrant, "General Amin," the astonishing political, not an alarming incident But Nongmochongcai performance to a white man of Africa's political adventure, the two three bizarre extra-marital affairs with the surging passion of the sensational repeatedly rubbing the lens was actually a desecration of the truth of history, of contempt for the people of Africa ... ... the view, Of course, not surprisingly, worthy of respect, but as far as I am concerned, the story of the British way, is about people and nature as the key link, a careless trip to the muddy water of the soul of young people from the ups and downs for clues to the story together, this is The new film is located. The subject matter of course, numerous types of law making, can be very political, very bloody, very calm, very documentary, the very ideology ... but ... the world of mainstream film aesthetic trends, the current is also a matter of fact it is two words: popular. A user-friendly and fully expressed their wish to express my understanding of the film is the most successful.
Second, this film will portray the character of two very profound, regardless of whether the film is true, are very credible, after the actors perform well, is more of a menace. Inside the main character Dr. Gary Young Kong is a very impulsive and very naive young man, after graduating from the various actions, such as after-school presumptuous of water, their eyes closed were the future of the globe to come to a decision, he can be seen The idea is still very impulsive and very bold, and the lack of rational thinking that finally led to his blind worship, and when he met Amin when he was actually kind of nice appearance and the language of gains, and He highlighted the naive character, in the end his fate is a matter of course. As Amin's personality, not to mention, Xiaolicangdao, Ayutthaya is a deep, but when he tells his own childhood, we found that, in fact, he is a poor man who had experienced We have not experienced If we follow his childhood experiences, I think most of us may choose to degenerate it! He stood there and the highest point, despite his brutal rule, but in the end is also a kind of extreme methods of rule, although he did was inhumane, but I still have to admire that he does have such a leadership, when He Gary Kong sanctions, he had tears falling down, we can see that he is not a callous person. He and everyone from the exchange point of view, his Ayutthaya especially profound in his Gary Kong exchange, will soon be able to win public support, so that there is no doubt that Gary Kong's allegiance to his own, although not its own He said then, however, this ability is very admirable.
Of course, a good script coupled with good character of a good film is far from sufficient, in which the main body of the actor's performance I think is the biggest film success. Among the leading man to become a best actor Academy Award winner Forest Intervet Hackett is really well-deserved. "The Last King of Scotland" at the end, the director placed a picture of the reality of Amin, his air of action, after I have read more forest sigh Intervet Hackett's performance has been superb, and his performances so I think he is Amin, Not only because it is the same black, also has a stout body, even his eyes each and every trick, even temperament and are similar. Among the other actors, despite not the best actor Academy Award-winning, but their superb acting is not in doubt is precisely because of these fine actors, only so much to win the support of the film's audience.
Finally, the film's narrative rhythm there is also a degree of relaxation. Foster in "Aspects of the novel", had "rhythm" as a novel to be an important aspect of the study, saying that "the pace handles the issue well on hate most, it will be rigid as a symbol, not to lead us forward, Instead, we will stumble, "The same can be applied to the film and on. The whole rhythm of the film compact, Diedang ups and downs, thrilling. At the end of the film are generally sensational climax, and other films of the same subject matter compared to "The Last King of Scotland" fan in place more to do and more accurate. • director Kevin Macdonald should get this year's best director award.
And the history of film of the same type of comparison, I think this film is more human, more educational significance, gives the impression of a more profound. Is not only cruel but also because the film a few scenes of violence, because the film is more unique narrative perspective, as well as the excellent actor. As a result, I am very satisfied with the film.
初看这部电影的时候其实是没什么兴趣的,对于独裁的片子也看了也不少了,无非就是讲一个君主的统治怎么怎么不好,怎么怎么横征暴敛等等,但看到后来没想到居然有继续看下去的冲动,因为这部片子确有跟别的不同的地方。
一个苏格兰的青年医师盖瑞岗,因为参加医疗慰问团而来到乌干达,不但受到当时乌干达的军事独裁者阿敏的赏识,还被留下来当他的御用医师。自诩为“末代独裁”的阿敏,把盖瑞岗当作是自己儿子般地宠爱,让他享尽荣华富贵…,这使盖瑞岗感到受宠若惊。年轻的盖瑞岗于是非常崇拜阿敏,甚至将他所做的一切暴行,都视之为理所当然。对于随处可见、毁灭性强的先进武器,盖瑞岗都视若无睹;就算看到反对阿敏的异议份子惨遭可怕的屠杀,他也不闻不问。直到有一天,当他发现自己被大家归为阿敏的党羽时,他才猛然觉悟到自己令人憎恶的一面。
首先是这部片子的叙述角度。这部片子跟别的片子不一样,它并不是直接通过描写暴君来体现他的残忍的,而是以一个第三者的角度,以一个第三者的经历来反衬出将军阿敏的狠毒。有些人可能觉得这电影没啥大意思,讲政治讲得不清不楚,尤其了解点儿历史背景的,更是嫌故事避重就轻,放着暴君“阿敏将军”的惊人政治、惊人事件不表,却浓墨重彩地表现一个白人小伙子的非洲政治历险,更把三两段奇形怪状的婚外情用激情澎湃的煽情镜头反复揉搓,简直就是对历史真相的亵渎,对非洲人民的蔑视……这样的观点出现,当然不奇怪,值得尊重,但就我而言,英国人的故事手法,以人为本,以性为纲,以一个不小心趟了浑水的年轻人的灵魂跌宕起伏的起承转合为故事线索,正是这部电影的新意所在。这个题材当然还有无数种拍法,可以非常政治、非常血腥、非常冷静、非常纪实、非常意识形态……但世界电影的主流审美趋向,目前来讲其实还就是那两个字:通俗。一个通俗易懂,并且能完全表达出自己想表达的片子我认识就是最成功的。
其次这部片子将两人的性格刻画的十分深刻,不管这部片子是否确有其事,都是十分可信的,经过演员们的精心表演,更加的是如虎添翼。里面主人公青年医师盖瑞岗是一个十分冲动并且又十分天真的年轻人,从他毕业后的种种举动,比如下课后的放肆戏水,对自己的未来居然闭着眼睛转地球仪来决定,可见他的思想还是很冲动的,很冒失的,缺乏理智的思考,以至于最后导致他的盲目崇拜,而当他遇到阿敏的时候居然又被他那慈祥的外表和和蔼的语言所蒙蔽,又突出了他天真的性格,因此,到最后他的下场也是理所当然的。至于阿敏的性格就更不用说了,笑里藏刀,是一个城府很深的人,但当他讲述自己童年的时候,我们才发现,其实他又是个可怜的人,他所经历的我们并没有经历过的,如果我们跟他一样童年的遭遇的话,我想也许我们大部分人会选择堕落吧!而他确站在最高点,他的统治尽管残酷,但终究也是一种偏激的统治方法,虽然他的做法是很不人道的,但我仍然不得不钦佩他这样一个确实有领导能力的人,当他对盖瑞岗进行制裁的时候,他掉下了眼泪,可见,他也并不是一个麻木不仁的人。从他与每个人的交流上来看,他的城府尤为深刻,在他对盖瑞岗进行交流的时候,很快便能收买人心,让盖瑞岗毫无置疑的去效忠自己,尽管自己并不是他自己说的那么好,不过,这种能力还是很令人佩服的。
当然,一个好的剧本加上好的人物性格对一部好片子是远远不够的,其中的主体,演员的表演我觉得才是影片最大的成功之处。当中的男主角能成为奥斯卡最佳男演员奖的得主福里斯特威克特真的是当之无愧。《末代独裁》的结尾,导演安插了现实的阿敏的画面,他的神态动作,我看过之后更加感叹福里斯特威克特的表演精湛了,他的表演让我觉得他就是阿敏,不仅是因为同是黑人,同样具有肥硕的身躯,就连他的每个眼神,每个小动作,甚至是气质都是及其相似的。其中的其他演员尽管没有获得奥斯卡最佳男演员的殊荣,但他们的精湛演技是毋庸置疑的,正是有了这些优秀的演员,才赢得了这么多支持这部片子的观众。
最后,这部片子的叙事节奏也是张弛有度的。 福斯特在《小说面面观》中,曾把“节奏”作为小说的一个重要方面加以考察,认为“节奏处理得不好就最使人讨厌,它会僵化为一种象征,不是带领我们前进,反而会把我们绊倒“,同样的道理也可以应用与电影上。整部片子节奏紧凑,跌荡起伏、扣人心弦。片子结尾一般都是煽情的高潮,和其他同样题材的片子相比较,《末代独裁》煽得更到位,拿捏更准。导演凯文•麦克唐纳才应该得今年的最佳导演奖。
与同类型的历史片相比较,我觉得此片更有了人性,更有了教育的意义,给人的印象更加的深刻。不仅仅是因为片中几处残忍而且暴力的镜头,更多的是因为本片独具特色的叙述视角,以及优秀的演员。因此,我对这部电影十分的满意。
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询