Question

请帮我翻译下这篇文章，万分感谢！

Victim Restitution for Financial and Emotional Suffering from Fraud

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The principle of restitution is an integral part of virtually every formal system of criminal justice. It holds that, whatever else society does to punish its wrongdoers, it should also insure that the criminal is required, if possible, to restorethe victim to his or her prior state of well-being.

The payment of restitution by perpetrators can mark the end of a financial nightmare for fraud victims. It not only serves to right a wrong, it often allows them to return to whatever level of financial security they enjoyed before the crime. The biggest dream for those who have suffered from financial crime is getting some money back, preferably from the people who stole it from them.

However, in reality, very few fraud perpetrators actually pay restitution. Many perpetrators will have spent the money and have no discernible resources with which to repay victims. In other cases, perpetrators will have placed assets in the names of others or hidden money in offshore accounts, so victims usually collect only pennies on the dollar of what they are owed, or get nothing at all.

One telemarketer recently told a prosecutor:

"I'd rather spend a million dollars fighting extradition than paying it back in restitution to the victims".

There have been attempts to deal with this problem by assigning fraud investigators to track the assets of suspected perpetrators before they are indicted.

Most restitution payments begin only after the defendant is released. So even if the court orders full restitution to victims, the collection and distribution of payments is often difficult, especially if perpetrators are sentenced to long periods of incarceration.

Additionally, victims not officially included in formal indictments are ineligible to receive any restitution unless their repayment is part of a plea negotiation.

Some losses may at least be tax-deductible so consult a qualified tax advisor or the taxation department to see if your losses qualify.

Answer 1

受害者归还金融和感情痛苦欺诈

-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------

恢复原状的原则是不可分割的组成部分几乎每个正规刑事司法系统。它认为，任何其他的社会，以惩罚其违法，它也应确保刑事需要，如果可能的话， restorethe受害者他或她的前国家的福祉。

支付赔偿的肇事者可以标志着金融恶梦欺诈的受害者。它不仅有助于正确的错误，但往往让他们返回任何一级的财政保障他们享有前罪行。最大的梦想是谁遭受金融犯罪越来越一些钱回来，最好是从人民谁偷走了它从他们。

然而，在现实生活中，很少有欺诈行为人实际支付赔偿金。许多肇事者将花费的钱并没有明显的资源来偿还受害者。在其他情况下，肇事者将放在资产他人的姓名或隐藏在海外帐户资金，因此受害者通常只收集硬币对美元的他们被拖欠，或者什么也看不到。

一个telemarketer最近告诉检察官：

“我宁愿花100万美元支付力争避免被引渡回比在恢复原状的受害者” 。

有试图解决这一问题指派欺诈调查，追踪资产的嫌疑人，才起诉。

最归还后，才开始支付被告获释。因此，即使法院的命令全部归还给受害人，收集和分配款项往往很难，尤其是当肇事者被判长期监禁。

此外，受害者没有正式列入正式的起诉书，无法获得任何赔偿，除非他们的还款是一个认罪谈判。

有些损失可能至少要减税，以便协商合格的税务顾问或税务部门，看看是否符合您的损失。