Question

跪求英语高手翻译 英译汉

The Secretary was to repeat this theme many times in the next year．A policy of allowing tax rates to decline even though the budget would not be in balance was justified by the short—term economic conditions--if a decline of expenditures could be foreseen which would subsequently bring the budget into balance at the lower tax rates．This was not a sign of preparation to take active measures in the budget to counter a recession--which was still a small cloud on the horizon--but it was a sign of willingness to interpret the budget—balancing rule in an elastic way．
Concern about a possible recession became active within the administration in the summer of 1953，and a number of defensive measures，including fiscal measures，were considered and some preparations were made．Studies of the expansibility of public works were initiated, and agencies were instructed to develop plans for an increase of public construction if that should become desirable. But no positive anti—recession fiscal measures were taken in 1953．The unemployment rate in August，1953，was the lowest of the entire postwar period and up to the present date．According to the figures then available the rate was only 1.9 percent in August and had risen only to 3 percent in December． A large tax cut was coming automatically on January 1,1954.The administration was preparing a major tax revision bill，incorporating some tax reduction and—it believed--substantial incentives for business investment，to be enacted in the spring of 1954．Moreover，the Federal Reserve was pursuing all expansive monetary policy．The administration saw no emergency requiring it to give up Its long—range goal of expenditure reduction．Its basic strategy was to push ahead toward that goal，unless conditions turned unexpectedly bad，while counting on tax reductions and monetary ease to keep the readjustment small and brief.
While the administration would not take positive action that would increase the budget deficit as long as the recession was mild，it wished to assure the country that it would act vigorously if the prospect deteriorated seriously，and it would not be deterred by fear of the deficit．A picture of his flexible attitude Oll balancing the budget was given by Eisenhower at a news conference On October 8，1953：
Balancing the budget will always remain。goal of any administration that believes as much as we do that the soundness of money must be assured，and that the unbalanced budget has a very bad effect on it．
That does not mean to say that you Can pick any specific date and say，“Here，all things must give way before a balanced budget．”It is a question of where the importance of a balanced budget comes in：but it must be the aim of any sound money program．

Answer 1

秘书长是重复这一主题多次在未来一年.A政策允许的税率下降，即使预算将无法平衡是有道理的，短期的经济条件-如果减少支出可以预见这将随后达致收支平衡的较低税率.这没有迹象准备采取积极措施在预算来对付衰退-这仍然是一个小云在地平线上-但它是一个迹象愿意解释预算平衡规则的弹性方式。
担心经济衰退可能成为活跃在政府内部在1953年夏天，一些防御性措施，包括财政措施，被认为和一些准备.可扩展性的公共工程已经开始，和机构的指示制定计划，增加了公共建筑如果要成为可取的。但是，没有积极的反衰退财政采取了措施，在1953.The失业率在8月， 1953年，是最低的整个战后时期，到现在da根据数字然后可用率仅在8月份百分之1.9并仅上升百分之三12 。大量减税即将于1月自动1,1954 。布什政府正在准备一项重大税修订条例草案，其中包括一些减税，它认为-大量鼓励商业投资，以颁布的春天1954.Moreover ，美联储正在采取扩张性货币政策的所有政府认为没有紧急要求它放弃其远景目标的支出.它的基本战略是推动实现这一目标，除非条件变成意外坏，而指望减税和货币便于随时调整小和简短。
虽然政府不会采取积极行动，增加预算赤字，只要是轻微的衰退，它希望向国家，它将采取有力如果前景严重恶化，而且不会在恐惧的赤字。图片，他灵活的态度油平衡预算是由艾森豪威尔在新闻发布会上10月8,1953 ：
平衡预算将永远。目标，任何政府当局，认为正如我们这样做的合理的资金必须得到保证，而且不平衡的预算有一个非常糟糕的影响。
这并不意味着说，你可以挑选任何具体日期和说， “在这里，所有的东西必须让位于前实现预算平衡。 ”这是一个问题的重要性，在平衡预算有：但必须的目的是任何健全货币计划。

Answer 2

厉害，这么多！？