Question

求助：毕业论文摘要翻译，十万火急（不要google之类翻译软件翻译的）

摘要：随着“整容风”的兴起，很多人凭后天整容变成所谓的“明星脸”，频繁地在各种广告、商业演出，引起了法学理论界和司法实践部门的争论。核心问题是:整容变“明星”是否构成侵权?单纯的整容变成自己喜爱的明星不可能构成侵权，但超出法律规则规范和社会公共利益约束、有不正当目的的则构成对表演者的表演者权、肖像权的侵犯。是否以营利为目的.并不是构成民事侵权的标准，认定侵害肖像权的民事侵权行为应从主观动机和实现营利的方式和手段去判定。

Answer 1

Abstract: With the "plastic wind" the rise of the day after surgery with a lot of people into the so-called "star face", often in a variety of advertising, business performance, caused by the legal theory and judicial practice, the debate department. The core question is: cosmetic change "star" is an infringement? Purely cosmetic into their favorite star can not be an infringement, but beyond the rule of law and social norms in the public interest constraint, and constitutes an improper purpose of a performer's performance From the right, violations of the right image. Whether for the purpose of profit. Does not constitute a tort standard, that the right against the tort portraits from the subjective realization of profit motive and the manner and means to determine.

Answer 2

Abstract: along with the rise of wind ", "cosetic surgery, a lot of people in the so-called" star become face ", frequently in various advertising, business performance, caused by jurists and judicial practice, the department of debate. The core problem is: cosmetic become "star" whether constitute infringement? Purely cosmetic into their favorite stars may not constitute an infringement, but beyond legal standard and the social public interest, improper purpose constraints on the constitute, portrait rights of performers performers. Whether the for-profit. Not constitute civil tort, the standard that the civil tort publicity from subjective motive and realize the profit of the way and the method to judge.

Answer 3

还要用英语的 没听说过