请高手帮我翻译一下。。不要工具翻译的!一点都不通顺
InresponsetoourrecommendationthatMSHAandNIOSHdevelopamemorandumofunderstanding,bothag...
In response to our recommendation that MSHA and NIOSH develop a memorandum of understanding, both agencies concurred with the need for a formal agreement and stated that such an agreement will help strengthen their coordination activities. MSHA noted that both agencies started the process of developing a memorandum of understanding in 2002 and stated that it will work with NIOSH to revitalize this effort and complete the process.
MSHA, Labor’s Office of the Solicitor, and the Commission agreed with our recommendation for improving the penalty appeals process. Each of them agreed that there needs to be transparency in penalty determinations and that the specific rationale need to be provided when penalties are reduced from the levels originally proposed. MSHA and the Solicitor agree that transparency is essential to ensure public confidence that the purposes of the Mine Act are fulfilled and that administration of the Mine Act is fair. They commented that they would formally remind CLRs and attorneys to ensure that the rationale for each civil penalty agreement is adequately documented in settlement agreements and case file notes. They also commented that internal audits of the CLR program have emphasized the need for adequate documentation to support settlement agreements.
In respect to our characterization of the Washbash Mine Holding Co. case, the Commission disagreed with GAO’s conclusions. We agree with the Commission that the reasons supporting the reduction are clearly explained. However, we continue to believe that the rationale for the final penalty amount was not well documented. In our analysis, we could not discern the specific reasons why the judge determined that $10,000 was the appropriate fine.
还有一段:In response to our recommendation that MSHA strengthen its monitoring of miner training, MSHA generally agreed and indicated that it will develop and implement standardized procedures for approving new instructors. In addition, it will develop an instructor evaluation plan to use in determining the effectiveness of training provided to miners. Regarding establishing continuing education requirements for approved instructors, MSHA indicated that it has asked NIOSH to review the effectiveness of such requirements. MSHA noted that this action may require regulatory changes. MSHA also explained that there are other avenues that instructors can use to stay current on mining issues, such as attending an annual conference dedicated to training resources for the industry. MSHA also recognized the need to improve the data it maintains on instructors and noted that it has plans to improve its tracking and dissemination of up- to-date information on approved instructors. 展开
MSHA, Labor’s Office of the Solicitor, and the Commission agreed with our recommendation for improving the penalty appeals process. Each of them agreed that there needs to be transparency in penalty determinations and that the specific rationale need to be provided when penalties are reduced from the levels originally proposed. MSHA and the Solicitor agree that transparency is essential to ensure public confidence that the purposes of the Mine Act are fulfilled and that administration of the Mine Act is fair. They commented that they would formally remind CLRs and attorneys to ensure that the rationale for each civil penalty agreement is adequately documented in settlement agreements and case file notes. They also commented that internal audits of the CLR program have emphasized the need for adequate documentation to support settlement agreements.
In respect to our characterization of the Washbash Mine Holding Co. case, the Commission disagreed with GAO’s conclusions. We agree with the Commission that the reasons supporting the reduction are clearly explained. However, we continue to believe that the rationale for the final penalty amount was not well documented. In our analysis, we could not discern the specific reasons why the judge determined that $10,000 was the appropriate fine.
还有一段:In response to our recommendation that MSHA strengthen its monitoring of miner training, MSHA generally agreed and indicated that it will develop and implement standardized procedures for approving new instructors. In addition, it will develop an instructor evaluation plan to use in determining the effectiveness of training provided to miners. Regarding establishing continuing education requirements for approved instructors, MSHA indicated that it has asked NIOSH to review the effectiveness of such requirements. MSHA noted that this action may require regulatory changes. MSHA also explained that there are other avenues that instructors can use to stay current on mining issues, such as attending an annual conference dedicated to training resources for the industry. MSHA also recognized the need to improve the data it maintains on instructors and noted that it has plans to improve its tracking and dissemination of up- to-date information on approved instructors. 展开
2个回答
展开全部
在回应我们的建议,即MSHA和NIOSH制定了一项谅解备忘录,这两个机构同意需要有一个正式协议,并指出,这样的协议将有助于加强他们的协调活动。 MSHA指出,这两个机构开始着手制定了一项谅解备忘录,在2002年,并指出,它会与NIOSH重振这方面的努力和完成这一进程。
MSHA ,工党的办公室律师,委员会同意我们的建议,为改善死刑上诉程序。他们每个人都一致认为,需要有透明度的处罚决定,而具体的理由需要时提供的处罚减少到原来的水平提出的。 MSHA和律师一致认为,透明度是必不可少的,以确保公众信心的目的,矿法的履行,管理排雷法是公平的。他们评论说,他们将正式提醒CLRs和律师,以确保每一个公民的理由罚款协议是足够的证据和解协议和案件档案说明。 They also commented that internal audits of the CLR program have emphasized the need for adequate documentation to support settlement agreements.
在尊重我们的表征Washbash矿控股公司情况下,委员会不同意高的结论。我们同意委员会的理由支持减少清楚的解释。但是,我们仍然认为的理由,最后罚款数额没有有案可稽。在我们的分析,我们无法辨别具体原因,法官认定,一点〇 〇 〇万美元是适当的罚款。
在回应我们的建议,即MSHA加强监测矿工培训, MSHA普遍同意,并表示将制定和实施标准化的程序审批新的教员。此外,将制定一个指导教师评价计划在确定使用的有效性提供的培训矿工。关于建立继续教育的要求批准教员, MSHA表示,它已要求NIOSH审查的效力,这样的要求。 MSHA指出,这一行动可能需要监管的变化。 MSHA还解释说,还有其他的途径,教师可以使用它来保持目前的开采问题,如出席一个年度会议专门用于培训资源的行业。MSHA还认识到需要改善数据保持对教员和指出,它已计划以改善其跟踪和传播最新的信息核准教员。
MSHA ,工党的办公室律师,委员会同意我们的建议,为改善死刑上诉程序。他们每个人都一致认为,需要有透明度的处罚决定,而具体的理由需要时提供的处罚减少到原来的水平提出的。 MSHA和律师一致认为,透明度是必不可少的,以确保公众信心的目的,矿法的履行,管理排雷法是公平的。他们评论说,他们将正式提醒CLRs和律师,以确保每一个公民的理由罚款协议是足够的证据和解协议和案件档案说明。 They also commented that internal audits of the CLR program have emphasized the need for adequate documentation to support settlement agreements.
在尊重我们的表征Washbash矿控股公司情况下,委员会不同意高的结论。我们同意委员会的理由支持减少清楚的解释。但是,我们仍然认为的理由,最后罚款数额没有有案可稽。在我们的分析,我们无法辨别具体原因,法官认定,一点〇 〇 〇万美元是适当的罚款。
在回应我们的建议,即MSHA加强监测矿工培训, MSHA普遍同意,并表示将制定和实施标准化的程序审批新的教员。此外,将制定一个指导教师评价计划在确定使用的有效性提供的培训矿工。关于建立继续教育的要求批准教员, MSHA表示,它已要求NIOSH审查的效力,这样的要求。 MSHA指出,这一行动可能需要监管的变化。 MSHA还解释说,还有其他的途径,教师可以使用它来保持目前的开采问题,如出席一个年度会议专门用于培训资源的行业。MSHA还认识到需要改善数据保持对教员和指出,它已计划以改善其跟踪和传播最新的信息核准教员。
展开全部
在回应我们的建议,即MSHA和NIOSH制定了一项谅解备忘录,这两个机构同意需要有一个正式协议,并指出,这样的协议将有助于加强他们的协调活动。 MSHA指出,这两个机构开始着手制定了一项谅解备忘录,在2002年,并指出,它会与NIOSH重振这方面的努力和完成这一进程。
MSHA ,工党的办公室律师,委员会同意我们的建议,为改善死刑上诉程序。他们每个人都一致认为,需要有透明度的处罚决定,而具体的理由需要时提供的处罚减少到原来的水平提出的。 MSHA和律师一致认为,透明度是必不可少的,以确保公众信心的目的,矿法的履行,管理排雷法是公平的。他们评论说,他们将正式提醒CLRs和律师,以确保每一个公民的理由罚款协议是足够的证据和解协议和案件档案说明。他们还评论说,内部审计的CLR计划都强调需要有足够的文件来支持和解协议。
在尊重我们的表征Washbash矿控股公司情况下,委员会不同意高的结论。我们同意委员会的理由支持减少清楚的解释。但是,我们仍然认为的理由,最后罚款数额没有有案可稽。在我们的分析,我们无法辨别具体原因,法官认定,一点○万美元是适当的罚款。
问题补充:还有一段:在回应我们的建议,即MSHA加强监测矿工培训, MSHA普遍同意,并表示将制定和实施标准化的程序审批新的教员。此外,将制定一个指导教师评价计划在确定使用的有效性提供的培训矿工。关于建立继续教育的要求批准教员, MSHA表示,它已要求NIOSH审查的效力,这样的要求。 MSHA指出,这一行动可能需要监管的变化。 MSHA还解释说,还有其他的途径,教师可以使用它来保持目前的开采问题,如出席一个年度会议专门用于培训资源的行业。 MSHA还认识到需要改善数据保持对教员和指出,它已计划以改善其跟踪和传播最新的信息核准教员。
MSHA ,工党的办公室律师,委员会同意我们的建议,为改善死刑上诉程序。他们每个人都一致认为,需要有透明度的处罚决定,而具体的理由需要时提供的处罚减少到原来的水平提出的。 MSHA和律师一致认为,透明度是必不可少的,以确保公众信心的目的,矿法的履行,管理排雷法是公平的。他们评论说,他们将正式提醒CLRs和律师,以确保每一个公民的理由罚款协议是足够的证据和解协议和案件档案说明。他们还评论说,内部审计的CLR计划都强调需要有足够的文件来支持和解协议。
在尊重我们的表征Washbash矿控股公司情况下,委员会不同意高的结论。我们同意委员会的理由支持减少清楚的解释。但是,我们仍然认为的理由,最后罚款数额没有有案可稽。在我们的分析,我们无法辨别具体原因,法官认定,一点○万美元是适当的罚款。
问题补充:还有一段:在回应我们的建议,即MSHA加强监测矿工培训, MSHA普遍同意,并表示将制定和实施标准化的程序审批新的教员。此外,将制定一个指导教师评价计划在确定使用的有效性提供的培训矿工。关于建立继续教育的要求批准教员, MSHA表示,它已要求NIOSH审查的效力,这样的要求。 MSHA指出,这一行动可能需要监管的变化。 MSHA还解释说,还有其他的途径,教师可以使用它来保持目前的开采问题,如出席一个年度会议专门用于培训资源的行业。 MSHA还认识到需要改善数据保持对教员和指出,它已计划以改善其跟踪和传播最新的信息核准教员。
本回答被提问者采纳
已赞过
已踩过<
评论
收起
你对这个回答的评价是?
推荐律师服务:
若未解决您的问题,请您详细描述您的问题,通过百度律临进行免费专业咨询